OCN

Volunteers reporting on community issues in Monument, Palmer Lake, and the surrounding Tri-Lakes area

OCN > monpc

Town of Monument Planning Commission Articles

Monument Planning Commission, May 14 – Commission recommends approval of 30-acre commercial development

By Janet Sellers

At the Monument Planning Commission meeting on May 14, the focus was on two projects that needed recommendations for approval by the commission. Commissioners present were Vice Chair Chad Smith, Ray Egly, Cathy Green, Danny Ours, Corey Peterson, Donna Hatch, Planner 1 Rey Medina, and Planning Director Dan Ungerleider. Chair Martin Trujillo was absent.

Storage at 836 Synthes

The first hearing and meeting item for the Monument Planning Commission included a public hearing for a request for conditional use approval for outdoor storage as part of the development at 836 Synthes Ave.

During the public portion of the hearing, questions were raised about landscaping and lighting for the proposed development.

The applicant, introduced as Mr. Chandler, confirmed that a row of trees would be maintained to ensure privacy and that lighting would be designed to face downward. Inquiries about outdoor storage were addressed, with Chandler explaining that the storage would comply with town regulations and would primarily involve service-related items.

The planning commissioners discussed the anticipated service industry uses which may include landscaping and utility storage. Concerns were raised about height restrictions confirming a 30-foot limit for buildings but not for equipment. The need for conditions on height and lighting were to protect nearby residential areas, and future compliance was suggested with any new lighting ordinances.

Commissioner Green commented for discussion regarding lighting (possible light pollution) even in terms of downward-facing lights that may cause a concern. Green made a motion to make a recommendation to approve the conditional use for outdoor storage at 836 Synthes Ave. as supported by the attached finding of fact with the conditions that the outdoor storage must not exceed 30 feet in height, which is the maximum building height for light industrial zoning. Commissioner Egly seconded the motion, and it passed with a vote 5 to 1.

Legacy at Jackson Landing

The sketch plan for the Legacy at Jackson Landing proposes a 30-acre commercial development which includes a 129,000 square foot “major” retailer, a potential hotel, restaurants, and additional retail space. It is located next to I-25, just north of Baptist Road. The public hearing on the sketch plan was opened and closed with members of the public present. There were no public comments.

A staff presentation was made by Ungerleider, who presented the project to the Planning Commission, and a detailed presentation was made by the representatives of Legacy at Jackson Landing that included speakers from Legacy Development partners, specifically Carl Barton, Chris Hake, and Noel Bremer representing Kimley Horn Engineering and Development Team that includes Legacy Development Partners, the Garrett Companies, RSP Architects, and others.

They stated their focus is on designing “innovative real estate solutions with a focus on high-growth markets across the United States. They specialize in the development and redevelopment of single tenant out parcels, multi-tenant shop buildings, grocery-anchored projects, and mixed-use developments.”

The presentation included information regarding creating a regionally significant destination retail development to bring visitors and dollars to Monument, using a national anchor retailer, quality site amenities and landscaping, convenient and safe parking circulation, optimizing economic impact, and bringing in local and visitor dollars. The development includes intended open space for safe pedestrian circulation.

The commissioners discussed clarification on the project’s design guidelines and the lack of residential elements. It was confirmed that the project would consist of a consolidated preliminary and final planned unit development without residential components. The signalized intersection at Jackson Creek Parkway was discussed as an improvement and planned for Blevins Buckle Trail. A traffic study would determine the need for a signal that is likely to be required for safe traffic flow, and concerns were expressed by the commissioners regarding potential congestion and safety hazards without guaranteed traffic signals.

Developers for this project discussed with the commissioners the importance of multiple access points for the new development, emphasizing the commitment of a major anchor tenant that will drive interest from other businesses. This engaged a discussion of traffic concerns for the Baptist Road at Jackson Creek Parkway intersection which was acknowledged with plans for further analysis. A strong interest for a sit-down restaurant into the development to meet community needs was also expressed by the commission.

In the interest of addressing potential effects on local infrastructure, there was discussion regarding a comprehensive traffic impact study due to the significant development being highlighted for the area. Public outreach was also addressed, and the commission discussed possible public engagement meetings for the community and was encouraged before any final approvals. Concerns were also raised about the town’s revenue situation with implications of an Economic Development Incentive Agreement on local finances.

Until a full-service traffic signal is required, a right-in right-out traffic condition was advocated for the intersection due to the necessity of having the traffic light installed at the beginning of the project rather than waiting for future phases. This conversation of the commission underscored the significance of traffic control measures in terms of the development’s initial phase.

The Planning Commission unanimously approved the Legacy of Jackson Landing sketch plan with incorporation of conditions outlined by the planning director in the draft resolution. Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve the sketch plan for Legacy Jackson Landing as supported by an attached finding of fact. Commissioner Ours seconded and the motion passed unanimously. There was some discussion on getting more community participation for the Planning Commission and on the requirements for living in the local boundaries, and the time frame of living in the town to be involved with the planning issues. As that was the final issue to review for recommendation, the meeting was then adjourned at 8:16pm.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission advises the Town Council on land use and development issues. The commission’s recommendations are based on local and state laws, zoning, and municipal codes. The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting of the Monument Planning Commission was scheduled for June 11 but has been canceled, according to the Planning Commission website. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028. A recording with a transcript of the meeting is also available.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, April 9 – Two recommendations for approval; high school students offered seat at the table

By Janet Sellers

At the Monument Planning Commission meeting on April 9, the focus was on public participation and fair review processes for land use matters in Monument. The commission emphasized the importance of transparency and community involvement.

The meeting covered public hearings for the Terrazzo Baja Commercial Development Final Plat and the Triview administration building. The commissioners discussed project details, traffic studies, and safety measures. A comprehensive traffic study is necessary for the Terrazzo development to ensure it meets local requirements and does not negatively impact traffic flow. This study will include stormwater management considerations.

The proposed final Planned Unit Development for the Triview administration building aims to consolidate utility services and administration into one location effectively. The design is intended to align with existing land use patterns and enhance the surrounding area.

Safety and infrastructure plans are being discussed for the proposed Triview building area, including vehicle maintenance and safety protocols for pedestrian crossings. Community input is important for enhancing these plans effectively because safety is a crucial concern during community interactions, particularly regarding pedestrian traffic and vehicle operations. Commissioner Danny Hours said drivers must be vigilant and slow down when approaching areas with pedestrians to prevent accidents.

Both projects received unanimous approval. Further information for the next stage of the comprehensive plan that includes the surveys for community input and focus groups is expected by the end of May, with discussions and meetings regarding the next steps soon after.

Commissioners Chad Smith, Martin Trujillo, and Donna Hatch attended the National Planning Commission meeting in Denver in late March. The conference highlighted the importance of community engagement in planning discussions, particularly regarding housing and water issues. Participants expressed appreciation for the opportunity to share insights and collaborate on these critical topics.

The commissioners indicated they felt they learned some effective tools and resources such as religious institution lands as a solution for housing in difficult areas around the Front Range, talks about water, and information on the housing crisis in Colorado. Smith indicated he will continue research in those kinds of areas. Upcoming, Monument Director of Planning Dan Ungerleider, offered to share the information and videos from the conference with the commission members for edification and solutions for many current concerns and issues that impact the community.

The Planning Commission still has two alternate commissioner vacancies open and requested participation of the community to fill the vacancies and “help shape the future of Monument.”

The meeting concluded with announcements and a call for high school student involvement in local governance. Local high school students interested in learning more about local government are encouraged to attend the Planning Commission meetings, especially to learn about the comprehensive plan process. Ungerleider indicated he is looking to bring back the student liaison program and is creating a formal program for this purpose.

The student participants will begin in the audience area, and eventually may have a seat with the commissioners, albeit non-voting seats. The comprehensive plan is for the future of the community, and Ungerleider said that “if it’s going to impact anybody, it’s going to impact our students.” Interested parties may contact Ungerleider at the Town of Monument or email him at dungerleider@tomgov.org

The community is invited to share thoughts with the town via the online website, and representatives will be present at events such as the weekly farmers market and the Fourth of July Parade. Residents also can visit the website, www.Monument2040.com.

The meeting adjourned at 6:41 pm.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission advises the Town Council on land use and development issues. The commission’s recommendations are based on local and state laws, zoning, and municipal codes. The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting is scheduled for May 14. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028. A recording with a transcript of the meeting is also available.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, March 12 – Promontory Pointe water tank project recommended for approval

By Janet Sellers

On March 12, the Monument Planning Commission discussed the Promontory Pointe water tank project, which includes a $7 million American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) grant for a new 1.5-million-gallon tank. The project requires rezoning 1.1 acres from the current Planned Unit Development (PUD) to final plat approval, and a major amendment to the Sanctuary Pointe PUD plan. The expanded site will include a concrete containment wall and screen wall. Landscaping and Americans with Disabilities Act plans were also discussed.

The project team, including NES Inc. and the Triview Metropolitan District, emphasized the need for additional water storage to meet growing demand. Public comment for this project was addressed regarding the new tank, which will be the same height as the old tank with only minor visibility changes, if any, for neighboring properties. The Planning Commission voted to approve this project for recommendation to the Town Council.

The meeting also highlighted community engagement efforts and the importance of public input in the planning process for Monument 2040, for which there is a web page and input availability for local residents.

This planning process is referenced on the Town of Monument website: “On January 6, 2025, the Monument Town Council launched the Monument 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update, enlisting the planning and design firm, The Lakota Group, to lead the community through the planning process. The comprehensive plan will serve as a long-term blueprint, guiding the community’s growth over the next 10-15 years and addressing critical areas such as housing, economic development, stormwater management, parks, and a special focus on the downtown area.”

The community is invited to share thoughts with the town via the online website, and representatives will be present at events such as the weekly farmers market and the Fourth of July Parade. Residents also can visit the website, www.Monument2040.com.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission advises the Town Council on land use and development issues. The commission’s recommendations are based on local and state laws, zoning, and municipal codes. The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting is scheduled for April 9. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028. A recording with a transcript of the meeting is also available.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, Feb. 12 – Commission reduces development density for key projects; Dairy Queen and Subway approvals recommended with landscaping condition

By Janet Sellers

On Feb. 12, the Monument Planning Commission rescheduled the review the construction of a retaining wall and storm sewer bypass of the Triview Promontory Point Water Tank Project on Higby Road. The wall, outside the project’s property line, raises concerns about property use and coordination. The board debated its authority to approve the wall, concluding it lacked jurisdiction. It also reviewed roadway standards, noting a 24-foot width for the project compared to 20-22 feet in other developments.

Despite supporting the project’s design, the commission voted to deny the appeal for the retaining wall, citing lack of authority and concerns about erosion control. The planning director will continue working with the developer and town staff to find a path forward on the Higby Road right-of-way improvements. The Planning Commission will have further discussions with the Town Council regarding the road width standards and criteria. This portion of the meeting concluded with a decision to adjourn for 10 minutes and reconvene later that evening.

The Planning Commission reconvened the meeting and addressed several key projects. The Connexus Lot 2 proposal by Meritage Homes was approved for recommendation to the town, reducing density to 6.9 units per acre from 10, with 158 lots and amenities. The Baja Terrazzo commercial development, reducing from 25 to nine lots with individual stormwater ponds for each lot, was also approved for recommendation to the Town Council. The Monument Marketplace North Lot 2 final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Dairy Queen and Subway was approved for recommendation to the Town Council, with conditions for landscaping and traffic impact.

The meeting also focused on approving a new zoning map, which is now accessible online and includes clickable features for detailed property information. Significant changes from 2024 to 2025 include a rezoning of a single-family home to commercial business. The map will be updated throughout the year, and a header indicating changes from the previous year will be added. The Comprehensive Plan update will begin on March 3, with community engagement sessions planned. Additionally, the stormwater management plan and a development impact fee study are underway. The meeting concluded at 8:44 p.m.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission advises the Town Council on land use and development issues. The commission’s recommendations are based on local and state laws, zoning, and municipal codes. The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting is scheduled for March 12. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028. A recording with a transcript of the meeting is also available.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Above: Monument Market Place North Lot 2 vicinity map. Courtesy the Town of Monument

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, Jan. 8 – Commission elects Trehill as chair, hears concerns about traffic and access for Woodmoor Placer Replat B

By Janet Sellers

At the Jan. 8 meeting, the Monument Planning Commission elected Martin Trehill as chair and Chad Smith as vice chair.

At the first public hearing for the Woodmoor Placer Replat B final plat, the project was approved, with concerns about traffic and access addressed. The second hearing approved the final plat for Falcon Commerce Center Park and Signage. The third hearing for Connexus Lot 2 was continued to Feb. 12. The meeting concluded with updates on the Comprehensive Plan and a development impact fee study, emphasizing community and developer outreach. Apologies were made for technical and other errors in the meeting.

The commissioners look to provide a calendar and schedule for the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update process, including opportunities for Planning Commission involvement. The commissioners also expressed frustration about the lack of detail in the minutes regarding split votes and discussed the importance of including detailed findings of fact in the minutes, given that there had been considerable discussion regarding the various significant issues brought forth in the December meeting resulting in a split vote.

As reported in the January issue of OCN, the commission had approved recommendations in a Dec. 11 meeting for the sketch plan for the Woodmoor Placer Replat B, a commercial subdivision along Jackson Creek Parkway. This is awaiting approval from the Monument Town Council. This development, aimed at accommodating growing community needs, includes six lots and will focus on shared access roads, pedestrian pathways, and utility easements. The commissioners emphasized their desire to ensure the architecture of the Woodmoor Placer Replat B development is compatible with the surrounding area during the site plan review process.

**********

The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting is scheduled for Feb. 12. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, Dec. 11 – Planning Commission recommends approval of Panda Express and Falcon Commerce Center

By Janet Sellers

At the Monument Planning Commission meeting on Dec. 11, key land use decisions were made, including approval of the final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a Panda Express restaurant and progress on the Falcon Commerce Center development.

Panda Express

Planned for Lot 5A of Monument Marketplace North, the new Panda Express would feature a drive-thru, landscaping, parking, and pedestrian access. While the commissioners expressed concerns about the building’s design, particularly its blank wall facing Jackson Creek Parkway, no public objections were raised, and the project was recommended for approval pending design refinements.

Falcon Commerce Center

The Falcon Commerce Center development was also reviewed, focusing on its environmental and infrastructure impacts. The development includes industrial warehouses and distribution facilities with substantial investments in water, sewer, and road infrastructure. The commissioners discussed efforts to address concerns from the Air Force Academy about Jackson Creek’s downstream conditions, including the installation of a buried wall to prevent erosion. The project’s shift from less restrictive PID zoning to a more controlled PUD ensures it aligns with the town’s comprehensive plan.

While the development has made significant strides, commissioners raised concerns about truck parking, traffic impacts, and the facility’s visual compatibility with the community. They also sought assurances about hazardous material handling and fire safety. No public comments were submitted during the hearings, and the project is now awaiting Town Council approval.

In addition to these discussions, the commission approved the sketch plan for the Woodmoor Placer Replat B, a commercial subdivision along Jackson Creek Parkway. This development, aimed at accommodating growing community needs, includes six lots and will focus on shared access roads, pedestrian pathways, and utility easements.

The commission’s ongoing dialogue with developers aims to balance growth with sustainability and community needs. As 2024 concluded, the Planning Commission was preparing for a busy January, which will include discussions on impact fees and leadership appointments. The meeting wrapped up with holiday well-wishes and appreciation for the year’s work.

**********

The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. It will revisit the discussion on the Jackson Creek North plat and Panda Express at the next meeting on Jan. 8. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, Nov. 13 – Board discusses Jackson Creek North plat; Panda Express public hearing moved to December

By Janet Sellers

At its Nov. 13 meeting, the Monument Planning Commission reviewed a request for approval of the preliminary and final plat for the Jackson Creek North Planned Multi-use District (PMD) owned by CSI Development. It noted that Higby Road will be widened from 70 to 100 feet for public improvements.

The discussion focused on safety improvements and a subdivision plat that dedicates land for stormwater management and waste control, without requesting development approval.

Note: A “final plat” specifically refers to a detailed, legally approved map of a subdivided land parcel, showing exact property boundaries and lot dimensions, while a “final plan” is a broader term encompassing the complete set of approved design drawings for a project, including architectural, site, and engineering plans, which may include a final plat as one component within the larger set of documents.

The meeting’s extensive plat discussions confirmed that the area does not yet have a development plan in place, which will go through the appropriate processes in the future. The commission approved recommending the plat request, emphasizing the importance of addressing public health and safety for the future plan. A motion was made and approved to recommend the plat to the Town Council, including a detailed study of Jackson Creek Parkway’s roadway construction and traffic impacts.

During public comments, a local parent and a staff member expressed concerns about child safety near Lewis-Palmer High School, emphasizing the need for sidewalks.

There are still unanswered plan questions, which will have to have to be addressed when a future development plan is proposed. At that point, after a plan has gone through the appropriate process, if there are questions, the town will have discussions and sometimes debate with the community. In the case of any disagreements, there is always the opportunity to bring that plan to the Town Council to appeal.

The public hearing for the Panda Express restaurant and drive-thru at Monument Marketplace was continued to the next Monument Planning Commission meeting on Dec.11 due to incomplete transportation studies affected by some technical issues.

**********

The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. It will revisit the discussion on the Jackson Creek North plat and the Panda Express at the next meeting on Dec. 11. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, Oct. 9 – Commission raises concerns about ultimate use for Jackson Creek North

By Janet Sellers

The Oct. 9 Monument Planning Commission meeting began with roll call, with all but commissioner Greg Collins present in person. Collins was present online. Discussions focused on the rezoning of 574 N. Washington St. and the preliminary and final plat for Jackson Creek North. The commission unanimously approved the rezoning of the property on North Washington Street to align with the comprehensive plan for single-family detached housing. However, concerns were raised regarding the adequacy of the right-of-way for future road improvements and the potential impact on downstream water flow for Jackson Creek North.

Insights from the meeting regarding Jackson Creek North included an analysis based on the Review and Approval Criteria established in section 18.02.260.C of the town’s regulations, alongside discussions and concerns raised during the meeting. The proposed Final Plat for the vacant property does not satisfactorily meet the criteria outlined in the town’s section 18.02.260.C, the commissioners said.

Key areas of concern included the lack of established ultimate use, inadequate service capacity provisions, insufficient information on cost-sharing for improvements, and limited consideration of natural hazards and conservation. Future developments will require more comprehensive planning to address these deficiencies and ensure compliance with town regulations.

The commissioners engaged in extensive discussions about the implications of zoning changes, including considerations for mixed-use development. Topics included residential height limits, stormwater management, and the legality of zoning across hundreds of acres in future developments in the area as well. The commission decided to continue the public hearing to seek legal advice, planning to reconvene in a Nov. 13 meeting with the town attorney present.

Amid the discussions, the commissioners said the proposed Final Plat for Jackson Creek North did not establish the ultimate use of the property and did not demonstrate compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan, or other plans adopted by the town. This non-conformance raised concerns regarding the alignment of the proposed development with the town’s long-term goals and vision.

The property is currently vacant and undeveloped, and the proposed Final Plat does not sufficiently address how it will ensure compatibility with adjacent properties, commissioners said. This lack of assessment could lead to future conflicts as development progresses. The proposed Final Plat creates a single lot, lacking insight into future development patterns. Additionally, it does not adequately address the impact on light, air, parks, open spaces, and other public uses, contrary to the expectations set forth in the Review and Approval Criteria.

Due to the absence of development plans, the proposed Final Plat cannot confirm the provision of adequate, safe, and efficient public improvements, utilities, and community facilities, the commissioners said. Ensuring sufficient service capacity is critical, and its absence poses significant concerns for future development.

It also does not provide the necessary development details to establish the property owner’s responsibility for onsite and offsite community improvements and facilities, failing to meet the requirements regarding cost-sharing for infrastructure improvements, the commissioners said.

While the proposed Final Plat addresses some natural hazards by dedicating an easement for wetland drainage and creating two tracts for open space and detention, it does not sufficiently cover protections against other natural hazards, such as fire, flood, or geological risks, the commissioners said. In addition to wetland drainage and open space tracts, the proposed Final Plat provides limited opportunities for the preservation and conservation of significant vegetation stands, which does not align fully with the requirements for natural conservation.

Although the proposed Jackson Creek North Final Plat adheres to technical requirements of form and content, it lacks adequate information to verify compliance with local, county, state, and federal regulations, the commissioners said. This lack of detail raised questions about the viability of development plans.

Future development on this property will necessitate the submission of a Site Plan, which must comply with the underlying zoning designation and development review criteria established in the Land Development Code. Additional modifications to the Final Plat may be required based on the forthcoming development plan and relevant codes and ordinances.

The meeting concluded with discussions on potential updates to the development code.

**********

The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. It will revisit the discussion on the Jackson Creek North plat at the next meeting on Nov. 13, with the town attorney present to address legalities. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission – September meeting canceled

By Janet Sellers

The Monument Planning Commission canceled its regular monthly meeting scheduled for Sept. 11. The Planning Commission’s next regular meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, Oct. 9 at 6 p.m. in the Town Council chambers at 645 Beacon Lite Road, Monument.

The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment. Information 719-884-8028 or www.townofmonument.org.

Janet Sellers can be reached at Janet Sellers@ocn.me

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, Aug. 14 – Proposed Ziggi’s project examined

By Janet Sellers

At the Aug. 14 meeting of the Monument Planning Commission (MPC), the commissioners considered a proposed Ziggi’s Coffee restaurant, discussed land development, and expressed concern about potential impacts of development on nearby homes and businesses. It also discussed a joint meeting with the Town Council concerning the scope of the Comprehensive Plan Update project.

The commissioners expressed concern about the orientation of buildings on Jackson Creek Parkway and suggested guidelines for development to create a welcoming look. Negotiating with developers during the preliminary process to set guidelines could limit frustration with buildings facing the “wrong direction,” starting the conversation earlier in the planning and design process.

The commission discussed the proposed development of Ziggi’s Coffee, a growing, nationwide coffee franchise, at Monument Marketplace North with the development representative and the owner. Concerns about zoning compliance, traffic generation, and pedestrian access were raised, while the developer emphasized a commitment to improving pedestrian access and addressing safety concerns. Design inconsistencies such as the drive-through design not resembling the front door and the building architecture facing Jackson Creek Parkway were physical issues of concern, as well as appropriate sidewalks.

The commissioners also discussed the visibility of new businesses in the area and the orientation of buildings on Jackson Creek Parkway. A commissioner expressed support for the project with regard to the supporting documents, while another commissioner raised concerns about safety in areas that “are not very safe.” Sign concerns were also raised, in the interest of making sure the businesses in that area will be successful.

Commissioner Ray Egley spoke up as it was noticed that the only access to the business is off what is being designated as a private road, which is off Harness Road. The concern was of snow removal and continuing maintenance of that road, not only for the businesses that are there but for the consumers who want to frequent those businesses. Commissioner Angley asked the developer, “… how would they address that, who’s taking care of that?” The developer replied that the entrance to the building is not on Jackson Creek Parkway but faces west. The owner of the business, Greg Flynn, owns five other Ziggi’s in Colorado and shared details of how the business plans to have a welcoming establishment with a fireplace indoors for atmosphere, banners at the high school, some in-house special days, and so on to show that it invests in the community.

The recommendation to approve the edifice of Ziggi’s was based on the final planned unit development for lot 4 of Monument Marketplace North, for a restaurant and drive through, supported by the display of facts on the meeting room screen and described by following documents that were shown for the site plan for the lot, prepared by MAH architectural group. Grading erosion control in site construction plans was prepared by the civil engineering group, with the drainage report for the marketplace filing 1 prepared by the same engineering group, and the traffic generation and analysis for Ziggi’s prepared by SM Roca LLC, the documents of which should include the attached findings of fact in support of the recommendation.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission usually meets the second Wednesday of each month. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. Information: 719-884-8028 or www.townofmonument.org.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, July 10 – Orientation workshop for new members

By Lisa Hatfield

The Monument Planning Commission held a new-member orientation workshop, instead of a formal meeting, on July 10. It was open to the public, but no action items were discussed, deliberated, or acted upon during this session.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission usually meets the second Wednesday of each month. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. Info: 719-884-8028 or at www.townofmonument.org.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Lisa Hatfield can be reached at LisaHatfield@ocn.me.

Monument Planning Commission, June 12 – Monument Planning Commission cancels June 12 meeting

By Janet Sellers

The following notice was posted on June 4 on the agenda page for the Town of Monument Planning Commission:

“The Town of Monument Planning Commission canceled its regular meeting scheduled for June 12, 2024. The Planning Commission’s next regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, July 10, at 6 p.m., in the town’s Council Chambers at 645 Beacon Light Road in Monument. Questions regarding this notice may be directed to the Town of Monument Clinic Department or 645 Beacon Light Road Monument Colorado 80132, or call 719-651-5405.”

**********

The Monument Planning Commission usually meets the second Wednesday of each month. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. Info: 719-884-8028 or at www.townofmonument.org.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, May 8 – Amusement park, more residential development recommended for approval

By Janet Sellers

The May 8 agenda of the Monument Planning Commission included a resolution for a final plat known as Willow Springs Ranch filing No. 2 and an ordinance for a planned unit development (PUD) known as Conexus Lost Island 2. Reports for communication and announcements with the commission and planning staff were also on the agenda. Public comments time was not on the posted agenda.

The commissioners’ main discussions were about the two development projects, Willow Springs Ranch final plat and Conexus Lost Island 2 PUD. Discussions highlighted the location, zoning, and surrounding land use of Willow Springs Ranch near Baptist Road and Forest Lakes Drive and the nearby roundabout, indicating the need for accommodating expected increases in traffic. Later, Ben Thurston presented the resolution for Conexus Lost Island 2 amusement park. The commissioners expressed concerns and supported the proposals, with some emphasizing the need to evaluate traffic studies and major evacuation routes, as well as respecting the small-town atmosphere of Monument.

Also at the meeting, speakers discussed various aspects of traffic management and infrastructure in Monument’s growing community, including the need for a traffic study to address evacuation routes and potential issues with roundabouts. The commissioners reviewed a proposed development plan for Willow Springs Ranch while other commissioners discussed a comprehensive review of mixed-use projects, especially of recent amusement park projects nearby in areas of Colorado Springs. The commissioners discussed proposals for a mixed-use development in a former industrial area and questioned the lack of design guidelines for a mixed-use development in a PUD. The discussion included respecting the need for the Town of Monument to preserve its small-town character feel throughout current growth possibilities.

Concerns arose regarding needed comprehensive traffic studies to be completed and understood before any building would begin, due to the expected increase in the traffic for locals coming and going as well as the traffic and its implied concerns regarding visitors to both the new home areas of the Willow Springs Ranch final plat and the new Conexus Lost Island 2 amusement sites, and for evacuation issues for all traffic, including local and interstate traffic of large trucks that must use the local streets in the case of severe weather complications.

The commissioners made a motion, unanimously approved, to recommend approval of Willow Springs Ranch if the proposed final plat conforms with the review and approval criteria as outlined in the town of Monument’s land development Code Section 8 2.0 2.260 with the condition that at the time of completion, the design of the future District 38 school at that area of Forest Lakes Drive will require conversion to a right in, right out travel ability if such intersection or access improvements are required. Also, the applicant, for the location entering the Willow Springs Metropolitan District, will be responsible for the design and construction of the road conversion. The proposed plat design preserves and conserves natural areas in vegetation. Group discussions for Willow Springs Ranch also included questions about the current validity of a previous traffic study and the potential need for new studies due to subsequent developments, zoning, and open space dedication.

Recreation development and environmental impact

The commission also heard an application sought for approval by the developer of the Conexus property along Beacon Lite Road for an amusement park, Lost Island 2, and development, including office, manufacturing, and commercial space.

The presenter said the proposed development provides for indoor and outdoor recreation activities not already in town. The commissioners said the developer bears the cost of needed public improvements and needed water conservation efforts to be put in place. Regarding land use and development in a residential area, clarification is needed for Santa Fe Trail alignment and prairie dog preservation. The commissioners questioned the PUD changes before the final plat vote and issues regarding the Connexus 14-acre property and zoning PUD issues for an outdoor recreation facility.

Zoning hearing for new development with miniature golf courses

The amusement park presenter detailed the site plan for the project, including shared access drives and parking, while the commissioners directed the applicant to provide safe and reasonable road improvements and that lighting for miniature golf courses and the architecture and design conform to open space and provide ample open space for circulation and recreation. The proposed amusement park could affect changes to the Santa Fe Trail and intersections, the neighboring properties, and privacy features.

Discussions ensued regarding clarity on the impact of new development on the small town of Monument, and the compatibility of a proposed recreation center with the natural surroundings of the area. The discussions examined traffic safety and the highway completion before businesses open, and related concerns about coordination of development and access for the existing community, overall traffic safety on Beacon Lite Road, and reviewed roundabout design factors. This discussion included concerns about the four-way stop at Old Denver Road and Second Street for temporary and long-term improvements.

A motion was made to recommend the Conexus/Lost Island 2 project for development, and it passed 6-0.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission meets next at 6 p.m. Wednesday, June 12, at the Monument Town Hall Board Room, 645 Beacon Lite Rd., Monument, and usually meets the second Wednesday of each month. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit https://townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. Info: 719-884-8028. https://townofmonument.org.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Lost Island amusement park vicinity map and site plan. Maps courtesy of the Town of Monument.
Willow Springs Ranch site plan. Map courtesy of the Town of Monument.

Other Monument articles

Monument Planning Commission, April 10 – Development processes discussed

By Janet Sellers

At the April 10 Monument Planning Commission meeting, the development process was discussed with a focus on providing more information upfront, streamlining the submittal process, clarifying the Planning Commission’s role, advocating for providing detailed information to address concerns, and providing individual submittals each time a new version is received. The group also brought up the issue of litigation and the lawyer’s role, while emphasizing the importance of having a final, unique project to discuss.

Speakers shared their previous experiences with the process, emphasizing the importance of reaching a consensus and expressing concerns about the cost of an attorney, while questioning the consistency of the Town Council in providing information to the public.

Development projects, Planning Commission roles

Speakers addressed concerns about providing too much information and suggested a more streamlined submittal process, while some questions revolved around the Planning Commission’s ability to comment on development projects, specifically regarding compliance with comprehensive plans and zoning regulations. Some explained that the commission can’t undo previous decisions but can provide input on individual projects through the preliminary and final PUD process.

Development process in a town

Speakers express frustration with the development process, feeling disoriented by multiple applications and lack of consolidation and that staff and developers should work together to consolidate projects and allow for a more efficient review process. A suggestion was made that negotiations with developers should be done at town level, not by staff, since staff can make administrative decisions, but big decisions should be made by the town body.

Planning changes and development in a community

The commission advocated for a thorough review of a comprehensive plan before zoning changes, emphasizing the importance of recording comments about roadway concerns for future reference.

The board discussed the importance of record-keeping for public representatives, mentioning the need to protect constituents by keeping a clear record of past decisions and emphasizing the value of open forums for constituents to research and understand past decisions, particularly when controversial items come up in the future. Since the board expressed frustration with inconsistent availability of an attorney during meetings, the town manager approved a request for legal counsel.

**********

Monument Planning Commission meeting are usually held on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting will be held Wednesday, May 8 at 6 pm at Town Hall Board Room, 645 Beacon Lite Rd., Monument. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. For information call 719-884-8028 or visit www.townofmonument.org.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument articles

Monument Planning Commission, Nov. 8 – Maverick station approved

By Leslie Hanks

The first agenda item at the Nov. 8 meeting of the Monument Planning Commission was 3A and 3B, Maverick Junction, Lot 1, Monument Junction West, Filing 1—Preliminary/Final PUD Plan. The property at 1530 Laughing Lab Way is at the intersection of Highway 105 and Jackson Creek Parkway. The proposed final PUD ordinance approving 1.5 acres is for a Maverick, a convenience/fuel store.

Planning staffer Jeff Liljegren found that the proposal is generally consistent with the Monument Comprehensive Plan. Planning staff explained that the proposal was “more likely consistent than less likely consistent” with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM).

Community concerns continue to focus on views, strong small-town community identity, adequate open space, and noise deterrence.

Staff found the proposal is consistent with most of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.

Additionally, staff found two items consistent with Monument land use policies: transportation and economic opportunities.

The associated traffic study found 4,149 weekday trips anticipated. The proposed Maverick convenience store is expected to generate an average of 4,000 trips per weekday. This will be a Level of Service (LOS) of F or better (F is a low score) for peak drive time in afternoons. A traffic signal will be warranted at Jackson Creek and Fat Tire Drive due to the LOS—F rating.

Staff explained that Lot 1 (Maverick convenience store) and Lot 4 (Whataburger) were already approved. According to records, the Final Plat for Monument Junction West, Filing 1—the two lots—was recorded on May 19, 2022.

This hearing was originally scheduled for the September and October meetings, which were cancelled. Proper notice was given for all three Planning Commission hearings.

Applicant Kevin Dice has met all 13 criteria for preliminary PUD review and all nine for final review.

Dice, senior planning manager for Maverick, gave a presentation about Maverick’s history, including a merger with Flying J. In September, Maverick completed a purchase of Kum & Go, making the Maverick holdings a total of 800 stores; 400 Maverick stores and 400 Kum & Go. Dice explained that the store is a 24/7 operation which will carry beer, wine, and tobacco but no spirits. The store will have fresh food prepared daily, and restrooms will be open to the public. Although there is a high flow component to the business, which will accommodate trucks, it is not a truck stop.

Consultant Mark Horton, a civil engineer, gave a brief presentation on Jackson Creek/Highway 105 improvement plans. “We’re on phase 2 with the Colorado Department of Transportation, El Paso County and Monument [three jurisdictions] reviewing transportation needs and we’re hopeful we can get started [in the] next year to 18 months, which should greatly improve the intersection of Highway 105 and Jackson Creek Parkway.”

Commissioner Martin Trujillo called for public comments in attendance and online, and there were none.

Trujillo then asked for commissioners’ comments and questions.

The commissioners discussed the proximity of the new Maverick station to the Kum & Go on Highway105 only 700 feet away. Dice explained that they have many locations where they have stores across the street from each other. Concerns were raised again about truck traffic. The applicant explained that the only 18-wheeler traffic onsite should be for fuel deliveries.

The measure passed on a 6-0 vote. It will now be considered by the Monument Town Council.

ZEAL at Jackson Creek

The next proposal on the agenda was measure 3B “ZEAL at Jackson Creek” Preliminary/Final Plat application. The property is at Higby and Bowstring Roads, off Jackson Creek Parkway. The property is 20.1 acres, zoned PRD10 Residential attached.

Staff reported that the proposal was substantially in compliance with the FLUM. They clarified that it is “more likely than less likely” consistent.

“Triview Metro District’s proposed improvements to Higby Road and adequate turn lanes make this proposal more than 50% in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan,” staff noted. Zoning for this proposal was approved in March 2015. This property is part of Regency Park 6th Amended and rezoned Plan—PRD10 Planned Residential District, Multi-Family land use.

The traffic study indicates this proposal would generate 1,238 trips daily. A roundabout is planned for traffic control through 2048. The project was rated LOS-C or better.

Still in question is the matter of whether the Higby Road right of way (ROW) of 95 feet is enough. Further discussion ensued about whether Higby Road should be a major collector (90 feet) or be a minor arterial (120 feet).

Jim Doby of Doby Development Group presented the ZEAL for Living “From Living to Thriving” proposal. Jim McGrady, district manager for Triview Metro District, also gave input about transportation matters.

Commissioner Trujillo closed the hearing after no public responses were received. He asked for commissioners’ input.

There was quite a bit of discussion about the nature of the proposal being more rental space while the Monument community has made it quite clear that it prefers single-family residential to multi-family attached.

Also, there was much discussion about the transportation concerns over Higby Road and whether there will be enough ROW with this proposal. After much input from Vice Chair Danny Ours and Commissioner Kathy Green, there was consensus for a continuance to further explore the transportation issues and whether the proposal, as presented, would actually be what will be developed in the event the property would be sold after the Preliminary/Final Plat was granted.

Commissioner Ours asked, “Could this 20-acre parcel be combined with other acreage and do a totally different proposal?”

Commissioner Green raised the concern, “Is this whole thing about circumventing code for a narrower ROW?”

After much debate, there was a request for a continuance for more time to study maps, roadways, and ROWs to better understand long-term Higby Road needs.

Commissioner Ours asked staff whether the owner was advised about Monument not wanting more rental properties. A staff member replied, “That isn’t the role of staff to ask those questions or make those comments.”

At this point the applicant stated that he hoped the Planning Commission will be following the Fair Housing Act.

The Commissioners voted 6-1 (Commissioner Ray Egley dissenting) for a continuance and suggested that at future hearings they would appreciate having legal representation available to answer questions for which they might need legal advice.

**********

The Monument Planning usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month at 6 pm at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road.. The next meeting is scheduled for Dec. 13. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Planning Commission. Info: 719-884-8028. www.townofmonument.org.

Leslie Hanks can be reached at lesliehanks@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, Aug. 9 – Variance approved for affordable housing project

By Leslie Hanks

The Aug. 9 Monument Planning Commission meeting was attended by Commissioners Chair Martin Trujillo, Vice Chair Danny Ours, Cathy Green, Sean Zernikow, Ray Egley, Greg Collins, and Chad Smith.

The planning staff started the meeting by explaining that the planning commissioners acting as the Board of Adjustment was appropriate. According to the Home Rule Charter, the Board of Adjustment has five members and the Planning Commission has seven. The staff said this was consistent with the charter which states: “the responsibilities of the BOA are to be absorbed by the Planning Commission, since positions on the adjustment board are difficult to fill.”

The first order of business was a proposed variance for a Final Plat of a proposed affordable housing project at 245 Front St., which had been previously approved but because of a staff error, the required applicant signatures were not submitted in a timely fashion. Without the variance, the applicant would be required to start the process over from the beginning.

This project is intended to provide affordable housing for community members. Several who testified, during public comment, that they were in favor of the variance mentioned Monument firefighters and first responders as those who might benefit the most.

Vice Chair Ours raised a question about language in the variance resolution, which implied that the applicant had somehow been at fault, when in fact it was determined that the planning staff had been in error. There was agreement that the resolution should be slightly reworded to properly reflect what had transpired and to clarify any potential confusion.

Planning Commission attorney Bob Cole had proposed that the applicant be required to sign a liability waiver, but community member Bonnie Hildebrandt asked the commission to support the variance without the liability waiver. Commissioner Green agreed that the variance should proceed without the liability waiver and suggested that the code should be revised so that this situation couldn’t happen again. She also raised concerns about whether the variance was the appropriate remedy for the situation.

Following the discussion about those technical issues, the Planning Commission passed the proposed variance unanimously, 7-0.

The remainder of the meeting was devoted to several other code revisions where language clarifications should make applicant requirements clearer and assist staff in being as specific as possible to avoid confusion.

**********

The next Planning Commission meeting will be held on Sept. 13 at Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The agenda and packet can be found at https://townofmonument.org.

Leslie Hanks can be reached at lesliehanks@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, June 28 – Town Planning Commission recommends approval of Monument Ridge 1 and 2 despite community concerns

By Leslie Hanks

The June 28 Monument Planning Commission hearing on Monument Ridge 1 and 2 was standing room only, with many people forced to stand in the hallway and listen to the hearing over the internet on their phones.

Chairperson Martin Trujillo, Vice Chairperson Danny Ours and Commissioners Nicholson, Greg Collins, Sean Zernickow, and Ray Egley were in attendance. Alternates Joe Kneedler and Chad Smith were sworn in as regular members for the meeting. Commissioner Cathy Green was in attendance online as a non-voting member.

The proposed annexation and zoning proposal had previously been heard and tabled Nov. 22, 2022.

Planning staff reviewed and recommended the annexing and rezoning of Monument Ridge 1, 90.98 acres on the southwest corner of County Line Road and I-25. The assertion was made that the property is contiguous to Monument, as required by state statute. However, it was later discussed that it was a “flagpole zoning,” which involves annexing narrow parcels of land to reach another parcel under annexation consideration. Staff member Sheila Booth explained that the developer was asked to resubmit the proposal so that Monument could have control of the project rather than El Paso County. Apparently, the project would be phased in until the missing 16 acre-feet of water required at the proposed density is acquired.

The staff recommended annexation and Residential Attached (RA) zoning.

There was discussion of boarding house and multifamily use being removed as possible uses.

The staff noted there were no letters of support received but there were letters of opposition.

The staff then presented plans for Monument Ridge 2 at the southeast corner of County Line Road and I-25, which is a 71.01-acre parcel. Annexation was recommended with RA 358 patio homes/condos. They stated the contiguity requirement was met. Woodmoor Water and Sanitation (WWSD) would provide the water and there would be a metro district. Both proposals are within the town’s recently adopted Three Mile Plan.

The developer proposed creating roads, and there was discussion of upgrading Beacon Lite Road and creating a roundabout at Misty Acres and County Line Road.

The staff recommended approval.

The staff stated that public notice was given and that the proposal complies with the 2017 Comprehensive Plan and meets Colorado Revised Statutes.

The developer’s representative, David Whitehead, explained that the Town of Monument invited him to re-apply. He explained that the roundabout was determined by a traffic study that included the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and Douglas County and that the roundabout can’t encroach into Douglas County. CDOT supports the transportation proposal.

There were many public comments, including:

  • “Why did the applicant withdraw and re-apply? What initiated the re-application?”
  • “What is proposed to accommodate the children, which will be part of this huge proposal?”
  • “Why were the citizens of Woodmoor not interacted with on a proposal of this magnitude when they will be most directly impacted?”
  • “A proposal of this magnitude will obviously impact crime. Why isn’t there a transition between Large Lot Residential and Residential Attached proposal?” Isn’t this completely out of character with the current 2-acre lots adjacent?”
  • “What are the children going to do, since the proposal is isolated and there is nothing in the plan to address the need?”
  • “What are the names of those who asked this developer to re-apply?”
  • “What will the impact to the police budget be?”
  • “Is this part of the ‘affordable housing’ push by Governor Polis?”
  • “Never ceases to amaze that developers ignore the Comprehensive Plan and the voice of the citizens. I worked on the 2017 Comp Plan, and this proposal is not in compliance with the 2017 Comprehensive Plan.”
  • “What about the wetlands in the area? How will the developer mitigate?”
  • “We don’t have enough water!”
  • “Do we want Jackson Creek-type densities on Monument Hill?”
  • “Why would we do a radical change from the current country feel?”
  • “The Monument grocery store isn’t adequate for this high-density proposal.”
  • “How can staff recommend going with this plan when it is short 16 acre-feet of water?” Denver, Dawson, and Arapahoe Sands aquifers are nearly dry.”
  • “You came back with basically the same proposal as last November; you can’t be surprised that we care about our community and that’s what you’re seeing.”
  • “The developer is not looking at this from the perspective of the people most affected.”
  • “The Planning Commission should approve annexation but deny the density.”

After the public comment period, Booth was asked to address the questions raised. She noted that Colorado Revised Statutes requires annexation and zoning be voted on simultaneously. She also explained that the school district was notified and was invited to submit comments. Booth stated that WWSD says they have enough water for the project. The question of adequate police coverage brought the reply that there are the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office and local police, “and property tax will cover the costs.”

A question raised about a wetland on the property sparked a discussion about whether it is a “regulatory wetland” and whether there is a requirement from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to address.

The staff noted that public notification was done properly and that the school district can ask for land dedication or “fees in lieu” but that ultimately the district will decide. In response to the question about how property values will be impacted, the staff remarked that that question has no easy answer.

During the staff discussion about water concerns, it was explained that the west side of I-25 proposal will be served by Monument Water and Sanitation and asserted that concern about the water shortage doesn’t take into consideration “Water Wise” programs or low-flow toilets.

In a closing remark, the developer said that from an economic standpoint, any lower density would make it impossible to justify the necessary infrastructure.

Finally, the staff recommended that concerned citizens should be sure to attend the July Town Council meeting to express their concerns.

Votes on the proposals:

Commissioner Ours’ motion to approve annexation on proposal 1, minus boarding houses, manufactured housing, and multifamily, failed 4-3.

Non-voting Commissioner Green (a city planner for 30 years) voiced a concern about giving too much away. “This is the time to require more from the developer.”

Ours responded to the question of “How can staff recommend (the proposal)” with his opinion that staff does an excellent job. He’s “hoping we can work things out here to be able to give Town Council guidance.” He stated, “We’re interested in the community too,” and that “We’re trying to do the right thing.”

Ours also noted that, “The developer spends millions putting a proposal together and if we vote to deny, we might face a lawsuit.”

Green made additional comments about the disparity between the Comprehensive Plan and these proposals and raised concerns about putting this conceptual plan in an annexation agreement and then the developer would be free to do whatever it wants.

More discussion centered on whether Monument can work with the developer to create a proposal the community can live with, or whether the developer might go back to El Paso County to get what it wants and will likely be granted permission for.

Commissioner Egley raised concerns about the economic impact to Monument.

The developer responded with, “You won’t get sales tax or property tax if we go back to the county.” Egley continued, stating that he is uncomfortable that the flag-pole annexation will leave 1,200 people isolated with no connection to the town and no open space or yards for kids.

The Planning Commission voted to annex both parcels and change the density from RA (Residential Attached) to LLR (Large Lot Residential)—9,000-square-foot lots.

The votes all passed 6-1, with Commissioner Egley voting no on all motions.

The project is recommended to the Monument Town Council for approval.

See the Town Council article on page < 1 >.

**********

The next meeting will be at 6 p.m. Aug. 9. See http://townofmonument.org or call 719-481-2954 for more information.

Leslie Hanks can be contacted at lesliehanks@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles