- Krob’s departure creates challenges
- Two vacant board seats to be filled
- Date set for hearings on Buc-ee’s annexation
- Red Rock Acres property ruled eligible for annexation
- Audit under way
By James Howald and Jackie Burhans
During three meetings in January, the Palmer Lake Board of Trustees (PLBOT) struggled to manage the turmoil resulting from a motion by Trustee Beth Harris, confirmed by votes from Trustees Atis Jurka and Roger Moseley, forcing Attorney Scot Krob to leave his post before a replacement could be found. The board settled on a process and schedule to fill the board seats vacated by the resignations of Michael Boyett and Tim Caves.
A date was set for the hearings on the Buc-ee’s annexation, also known as the Monument Ridge West annexation, but the board could not decide on how and when the annexation should be put to the voters. The board held a public hearing on the eligibility of the Red Rock Acres property for annexation and heard a presentation from the town’s new audit company.

Krob’s departure creates challenges
On Dec. 11, following a lengthy and contentious discussion with Trustee Roger Moseley regarding Krob’s service to the town, Krob resigned his position as town attorney, offering to continue on an interim basis until a replacement could be found. Details about Krob’s resignation can be found here: https://wp.ocn.me/v26n1plbot/#town-attorney-scott-krob-resigns.
At the Jan. 8 board meeting, Mayor Dennis Stern moved to accept Krob’s resignation and his offer to act as interim attorney. He said finding a different interim attorney was not a wise path, because the town would lose continuity and might not be able to find an interim attorney faster than it could find a permanent one. Krob said as interim attorney, he would only work on maintaining legal issues already underway and would not begin anything new. Town Clerk Erica Romero said a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a permanent attorney had already gone out.
Interim Town Administrator Glen Smith said replacing Krob on an interim basis would lose time, because a new interim attorney would need to come up to speed. Romero pointed out that a new interim attorney would charge by the hour to be familiarized with the town’s legal issues and that it would be a hardship for the town staff to go without legal advice.
Stern’s motion on Jan. 8 passed with Jurka, Trustee Tony Beltran, and Stern voting in favor. Moseley voted no, and Harris was not present to vote.
At the Jan. 22 meeting, Harris reversed direction, moving to terminate the town’s contract with Krob Law the next day, removing him from his role as interim attorney and directing the town staff to find an interim attorney in one week, by Jan. 30. Jurka seconded her motion.
Smith pushed back on Harris’s motion, saying, “You are showing your inexperience. This town will cease to function in a way you have no idea . . . This is bush league. If you sever contact with your attorney, it’s a huge mistake.” Harris answered that the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA), the town’s insurer, would cover the town legally, adding that the risk of keeping Krob in place was higher than using CIRSA. She said Krob lacks the confidence of the public and gave as an example the fact that Krob did not share his concerns about ambiguities in the language of the initiated ordinance regarding annexation elections with the board in a timely manner. Jurka agreed with Harris, saying he did not have confidence in Krob’s ability to give the town the best legal advice.
Romero said the town staff had been working hard to meet the board’s demands but could not continue to meet them if the staff’s resources were “being cut from us left and right.” She said she could not do her job without legal representation.
Beltran pointed out that Smith and Romero were already doing multiple jobs for the town.
Harris’s motion to remove Krob immediately as interim attorney passed, with Harris, Jurka, and Moseley voting in favor. Stern and Beltran voted no.
Following the vote, Jurka moved to authorize Smith to sign an agreement with an attorney recommended by CIRSA to serve on an interim basis; the motion passed with a unanimous vote.
At the Jan. 30 meeting, Smith updated the board on his efforts to find an attorney on an interim and a permanent basis. He said he had contacted 16 attorneys; only two had expressed interest in serving as the town’s attorney on an interim basis. At the board’s request, he contacted CIRSA, which told him it did not provide attorneys but gave him a list of eight attorneys who practice local government law. He contacted every attorney referred to him. He also contacted attorneys recommended by the Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) and the Colorado Municipal League (CML). Smith said he expected to have some candidates for the board to consider by next week. He said he had one inquiry about the request for a permanent attorney.
In response to a question from Harris, Smith said no citizens had referred lawyers to him for consideration.
Smith noted he was looking into the background of lawyers who expressed interest in serving the town and was asking them to draft their own terms of employment, which he would then review with CIRSA and CML. He added that although the board gave him signing authority at the previous meeting, any hiring decision would be made following a legal review and agreement from the board.
Harris asked to have an agenda item added for the Feb. 12 meeting to consider hiring an interim attorney.
Two vacant board seats to be filled
At the Jan. 8 meeting, Stern moved to accept the resignation of Boyett and Caves. The motion passed unanimously, giving the board 60 days to fill the vacant seats by appointment to avoid a special election to fill them. Stern and Jurka recommended accepting applications until Jan. 30, then interviewing applicants at a work session and making appointments at the board meeting on Feb. 12. Moseley said he felt the questions asked of the last round of applicants were not helpful and suggested the board draft better ones. Romero asked the board members to send her questions to be used in the next round of interviews.
At the Jan. 30 meeting, Romero said she had received four applications for the two vacant seats.
The board decided to hold a work session at 4:30 pm on Feb. 12 to interview the candidates and to hold a vote at the board meeting following the work session. There was a consensus to reduce the number of questions that candidates would be asked. Harris asked the staff to track the questions asked and to ensure all candidates were asked the same questions.
Date set for hearings on Buc-ee’s annexation
At the Jan. 30 meeting, the board tried again to decide how the hearings and the election regarding the Buc-ee’s annexation would be handled. Dates for the hearings and when the election would be held were unclear. Stern asked Romero to confirm what dates had been set by the board in previous meetings for the Buc-ee’s annexation hearings and the election that would allow voters to approve or deny the proposed annexation. Romero said she could not confirm those dates without legal counsel, which the town does not have after Krob’s role as interim attorney was terminated.
Moseley said he believed the annexation hearings had been continued to Feb. 5 and the annexation election had been scheduled for Feb. 19. He argued the town’s current code required the election to be held after the hearings were completed. He said the date for the election could not be decided until after the hearings had been held. Stern said he believed the code would need to be changed due to the initiated ordinance that required all annexations to go to a vote, and that was why the board had asked for a declaratory judgment from a court to settle the issue.
Romero said the town had received a letter from Buc-ee’s attorney, which she had passed on to the board. She did not characterize the contents; she asked the board to acknowledge receipt.
Moseley said he interpreted the letter to say if the annexation hearings were set before the election, Buc-ee’s would participate in the hearings “under formal protest.” He moved that the board abide by the code as it was presently written, and the election be the final step in the process. There was not a second to Moseley’s motion.
Romero pointed out that the agenda for the meeting would need to be amended for the board to act on Mosley’s motion, because the hearings and election were on the agenda only as items for discussion.
Resident Mark Waller, who is also a consultant to Buc-ee’s, said the board could not act on any issue without 24 hours’ notice to the public, to avoid having “things passed in the darkness of night.” Two other residents disagreed with Waller’s opinion. Stern said a resolution would be required to settle the issue; it would be added to the agenda for the next meeting, and the board would not vote on it at the current meeting.
Moseley then moved to cancel the election on Feb. 19, which he thought was improperly set. Harris seconded the motion. Romero said no resolution had been drafted to cancel the election. Harris recommended that Moseley’s motion be withdrawn.
Moseley responded by making another motion to direct staff to draft a resolution cancelling the election, to be voted on at the next meeting. Smith said the town staff could not write a resolution without legal advice. There was no second to this motion.
Moseley then moved to continue the Buc-ee’s hearings from Feb. 5 to Feb. 19 and to direct staff to provide notice of the new hearing date. Stern responded, again, that action could not be taken on this issue, since it was listed for discussion only, and any election date needed to have 30 days’ notice. Romero repeated her hesitance to decide without legal representation. After some discussion about the availability of the Town Hall on Feb. 19, Harris seconded Moseley’s motion. The motion passed with Harris, Jurka, and Moseley voting yes and Beltran and Stern voting no.
The board took no action on the question of where the election should fit in the annexation process.
Red Rock Acres property ruled eligible for annexation
At the Jan. 22 meeting, the board held a public hearing to decide the eligibility of the Red Rock Acre property for annexation. Jason Alwine, senior associate of NES Inc., representing GTG Red Rock LLC, said the 39.5-acre property was located east of Highway 105, midway between Monument and Palmer Lake, and is currently in unincorporated El Paso County. In his presentation, he argued that the property met all the requirements for annexation, including contiguity and community of interest.
The board voted that the property is eligible for annexation. Determination of eligibility is the first step of several in the annexation process. The proposed annexation must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and voted on by the board before the annexation is complete.
Audit under way
At previous meetings, Smith reported to the board that the town’s audit was delinquent due to the failure of the auditing company to honor its contract, which led to the replacement of that company with Hinkle & Co.
At the Jan. 22 meeting, Jim Hinkle told the board his firm had been hired in mid-December and was making good progress. He said he expected to finish the audit and file the required information with the state within 30 days. To date, nothing concerning had been found, he said.
**********
The next regular board meetings are scheduled for Feb. 12 and 26. See the town’s website at www.townofpalmerlake.com to confirm times and dates of board meetings and workshops. Meetings are typically held on the second and fourth Thursdays of the month at the Town Hall. Information: 719-481-2953.
James Howald can be reached at jameshowald@ocn.me. Jackie Burhans can be reached at jackieburhans@ocn.me.
Other Palmer Lake Board of Trustees articles
- Palmer Lake Board of Trustees, Jan. 8, 22, and 30 – Attorney Krob forced out without replacement (2/4/2026)
- Palmer Lake Board of Trustees, Dec. 2, 11 – Beltran appointed; Caves, Krob, and Boyett resign (1/1/2026)
- Palmer Lake Board of Trustees, Nov. 13 and 18 – Schedule for annexation elections undecided; board vacancy unfilled (12/4/2025)
- Palmer Lake Board of Trustees, Oct. 2, 9, and 23 – Annexation election set for Feb. 3, trustee resigns, lawsuits dismissed (10/30/2025)
- Palmer Lake Board of Trustees, Sept. 25 – New board members seated; annexation ordinance becomes law (10/2/2025)
- Palmer Lake Board of Trustees, Aug. 6, 14, 28 – Board vacancy filled; land use code updated; annexation decision postponed (9/4/2025)
- Palmer Lake Board of Trustees, June 30, July 10, 24 – Candidates for board interviewed; recall election planned; annexation agreement published (8/1/2025)
- Palmer Lake Board of Trustees, June 12, 19, 23, and 30 – Stern replaces Havenar as mayor; attempt to stop recalls fails (7/3/2025)
- Palmer Lake Board of Trustees, May 5, 8, 22, and 29 – Revised Buc-ee’s annexation eligibility petition approved (6/7/2025)
- Palmer Lake Board of Trustees, April 10 and 24 – Second Buc-ee’s annexation eligibility hearing scheduled (5/3/2025)





























