OCN

Volunteers reporting on community issues in Monument, Palmer Lake, and the surrounding Tri-Lakes area

OCN > mon

Town of Monument Articles

Monument Town Council, May 5 and 19 – VanDenHoek sworn in as town manager

By Chris Jeub

After months of consideration, the Monument Town Council finalized the selection of a new town manager on May 19. Madeline VanDenHoek was unanimously appointed as the official Town Manager. VanDenHoek had been serving as interim town manager since June 2024 following the removal of the previous Town Manager Mike Foreman.

Councilmembers emphasized the difficulty of the decision due to the high qualifications of two candidates. King noted that both candidates met qualifications and expressed hope that the candidate not selected (unnamed during the council discussion, but known to be Deputy Town Clerk Sylvia Simpson) would remain involved with the town. Councilmember Laura Kronick highlighted the significance of how candidates described their educational applications during interviews, ultimately recommending VanDenHoek. Abbott acknowledged the challenging nature of the decision-making process but underscored VanDenHoek’s alignment with required skill sets and experience.

Councilmember Kenneth Kimple commended both applicants for their openness and clear vision demonstrated during interviews, affirming VanDenHoek’s alignment with the town’s best interests. Councilmember Marco Fiorito also expressed appreciation for the candidates’ efforts and preparation during the process.

The motion to appoint VanDenHoek passed with a unanimous vote of 6-0 and she was officially sworn in.

Above: Madeline VanDenHoek was sworn in as town manager at the Monument Town Council (MTC) meeting on May 19, nine months after taking over for Mike Foreman on an interim basis. VanDenHoek said she looks forward to “ensuring that we are not only the best place to work, but also the best place to live, have a business and play.” The MTC voted unanimously on May 8 to choose VanDenHoek over the other candidate for the job, Sylvia Simpson, who remains the deputy town clerk. No reason was ever given publicly for why Foreman was let go in August of last year. In the photo from left are VanDenHoek’s son Dane, husband Eric, father Jack Kennedy (in the back), VanDenHoek, and mother Marna Kennedy. Photo by Michael Weinfeld. See video clips at end of article.

Budget concerns

Note: The budget presentation made by Finance Director Jennifer Phillips was not recorded on the town’s YouTube channel due to technical issues. The online video resumed during the council’s discussion following the presentation. The summary of the budget presentation from the slides is as follows:

  • The town maintains various dedicated funds such as the General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, Water Fund, Police Fund, and Community Development Fund.
  • Adjustments were made to correct $1.5 million in duplicate postings due to system changes.
  • General Fund projected revenue increased to $14.6 million, with major sources including sales and property taxes, fees, fines, and investment earnings.
  • Significant amendments include adding a legally obligated sales tax revenue ($2.6 million), transferring back a $400,000 subsidy from 2024, and including a $200,000 grant for a Comprehensive Plan Study.
  • General Fund expenditures increased to $16.4 million, with adjustments including the addition of a sales tax expense to Triview ($2.6 million), reductions in personnel expenses for vacant positions, and removal of certain budgeted expenses.
  • Ending General Fund unrestricted reserve improved to 21% from a previously lower percentage.

After the presentation of the budget notes, Mayor Mitch LaKind expressed gratitude toward Phillips for identifying and addressing financial discrepancies, with Mayor Pro Tem Steve King acknowledging her efforts to rectify past accounting issues.

In response to budget challenges, council members discussed potential reduction strategies. Selling town-owned properties to rebuild financial reserves was proposed, and Mayor LaKind instructed staff to explore additional revenue-generating opportunities. Councilmembers Kenneth Kimple and Sana Abbott emphasized the importance of transparently communicating the town’s financial issues to residents and called for effective community education regarding budgetary concerns.

The council unanimously supported reconsideration of the lodging tax for an upcoming ballot. King underscored the urgency of this measure, noting that the absence of a lodging tax was resulting in significant financial losses for the town, with revenues instead benefiting Colorado Springs.

The council approved Resolution No. 30-2025, appropriating funds for various town activities and services, and Resolution No. 31-2025, which introduced new financial policies aimed at ensuring sustainable town funding. Both resolutions passed with unanimous votes.

Romanello’s seat replacement discussed

The council also addressed the vacancy created by the recent passing of Councilmember Jim Romanello (see May issue of OCN for details). LaKind directed staff to prepare for either an appointment process or a special election to fill the vacant council seat. The council later announced on its Facebook page that it will appoint a replacement for Romanello. It said potential candidates should submit a letter of interest, resume, and notarized affidavit affirming they meet all the qualifications to the town clerk no later than 5 p.m. June 9. The candidates might then be interviewed at the Town Council meeting on June 16.

Terrazzo-Baja commercial development

Resolution No. 28-2025 approved the final plat for the Terrazzo-Baja Commercial Development, subdividing nine individual lots for sale and future development and dedicating public rights of way for Terrazzo Drive extension and Baja Drive addition. This action aligns with the previously approved Santa Fe Park preliminary planned unit development.

Due to the technical difficulties previously mentioned, discussion and final voting results on this resolution were not recorded, a voting result that left King the sole dissenter. He later clarified his dissent during the May 17 regular meeting. King opposed creating larger lots from previously smaller sizes, expressing concern that larger lots could attract warehouse applications, which he argued would not generate sufficient sales tax or property tax revenue. King emphasized the importance of maintaining smaller lot sizes, allowing potential buyers to request combining lots from the council on a case-by-case basis, preserving town control over lot sizes created just a few years prior.

Strategic plan update

A representative of JTrylch Strategy and Consulting LLC gave an update of the new strategic plan of the town. The plan emphasizes simplicity, clear focus, and accountability. It identifies four equally important strategic priorities:

  1. Ensure Long-Term Financial Health and Sustainability: Focused on efficient services, resilient financial planning, and strategic investments.
  2. Strengthen Community Engagement: Aimed at improving communication, collaboration, and partnership within the community and neighboring areas.
  3. Enable Responsible Community Development: Establish clear processes to foster responsible growth and sustainable development.
  4. Reinforce a Positive Work Culture: Sustain a professional environment that attracts talented staff and promotes excellent community services.

Following the presentation, the Town Council unanimously passed Resolution No. 34-2025 in a 5-0 vote.

Town lawyer position discussed

VanDenHoek sought direction from the board regarding the potential hiring of a permanent town lawyer. Councilmember Laura Kronick emphasized that hiring a staff attorney would be fiscally responsible, noting that current town attorney Bob Cole would still handle larger matters. King inquired about typical tasks for the role, and VanDenHoek explained that routine contract reviews and code details could be handled more economically by an in-house attorney. Kimple questioned potential savings, to which VanDenHoek responded that $100,000 to $200,000 annually might be saved. LaKind directed VanDenHoek to draft a job posting and present it for council review at a later date.

**********

The Monument Town Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, June 2 and 16. For more information, call 719-884-8014 or visit www.townofmonument.org. To view upcoming agendas, complete board packets, or download audio recordings of past meetings, visit http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on “Town Council.”

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, May 14 – Commission recommends approval of 30-acre commercial development

By Janet Sellers

At the Monument Planning Commission meeting on May 14, the focus was on two projects that needed recommendations for approval by the commission. Commissioners present were Vice Chair Chad Smith, Ray Egly, Cathy Green, Danny Ours, Corey Peterson, Donna Hatch, Planner 1 Rey Medina, and Planning Director Dan Ungerleider. Chair Martin Trujillo was absent.

Storage at 836 Synthes

The first hearing and meeting item for the Monument Planning Commission included a public hearing for a request for conditional use approval for outdoor storage as part of the development at 836 Synthes Ave.

During the public portion of the hearing, questions were raised about landscaping and lighting for the proposed development.

The applicant, introduced as Mr. Chandler, confirmed that a row of trees would be maintained to ensure privacy and that lighting would be designed to face downward. Inquiries about outdoor storage were addressed, with Chandler explaining that the storage would comply with town regulations and would primarily involve service-related items.

The planning commissioners discussed the anticipated service industry uses which may include landscaping and utility storage. Concerns were raised about height restrictions confirming a 30-foot limit for buildings but not for equipment. The need for conditions on height and lighting were to protect nearby residential areas, and future compliance was suggested with any new lighting ordinances.

Commissioner Green commented for discussion regarding lighting (possible light pollution) even in terms of downward-facing lights that may cause a concern. Green made a motion to make a recommendation to approve the conditional use for outdoor storage at 836 Synthes Ave. as supported by the attached finding of fact with the conditions that the outdoor storage must not exceed 30 feet in height, which is the maximum building height for light industrial zoning. Commissioner Egly seconded the motion, and it passed with a vote 5 to 1.

Legacy at Jackson Landing

The sketch plan for the Legacy at Jackson Landing proposes a 30-acre commercial development which includes a 129,000 square foot “major” retailer, a potential hotel, restaurants, and additional retail space. It is located next to I-25, just north of Baptist Road. The public hearing on the sketch plan was opened and closed with members of the public present. There were no public comments.

A staff presentation was made by Ungerleider, who presented the project to the Planning Commission, and a detailed presentation was made by the representatives of Legacy at Jackson Landing that included speakers from Legacy Development partners, specifically Carl Barton, Chris Hake, and Noel Bremer representing Kimley Horn Engineering and Development Team that includes Legacy Development Partners, the Garrett Companies, RSP Architects, and others.

They stated their focus is on designing “innovative real estate solutions with a focus on high-growth markets across the United States. They specialize in the development and redevelopment of single tenant out parcels, multi-tenant shop buildings, grocery-anchored projects, and mixed-use developments.”

The presentation included information regarding creating a regionally significant destination retail development to bring visitors and dollars to Monument, using a national anchor retailer, quality site amenities and landscaping, convenient and safe parking circulation, optimizing economic impact, and bringing in local and visitor dollars. The development includes intended open space for safe pedestrian circulation.

The commissioners discussed clarification on the project’s design guidelines and the lack of residential elements. It was confirmed that the project would consist of a consolidated preliminary and final planned unit development without residential components. The signalized intersection at Jackson Creek Parkway was discussed as an improvement and planned for Blevins Buckle Trail. A traffic study would determine the need for a signal that is likely to be required for safe traffic flow, and concerns were expressed by the commissioners regarding potential congestion and safety hazards without guaranteed traffic signals.

Developers for this project discussed with the commissioners the importance of multiple access points for the new development, emphasizing the commitment of a major anchor tenant that will drive interest from other businesses. This engaged a discussion of traffic concerns for the Baptist Road at Jackson Creek Parkway intersection which was acknowledged with plans for further analysis. A strong interest for a sit-down restaurant into the development to meet community needs was also expressed by the commission.

In the interest of addressing potential effects on local infrastructure, there was discussion regarding a comprehensive traffic impact study due to the significant development being highlighted for the area. Public outreach was also addressed, and the commission discussed possible public engagement meetings for the community and was encouraged before any final approvals. Concerns were also raised about the town’s revenue situation with implications of an Economic Development Incentive Agreement on local finances.

Until a full-service traffic signal is required, a right-in right-out traffic condition was advocated for the intersection due to the necessity of having the traffic light installed at the beginning of the project rather than waiting for future phases. This conversation of the commission underscored the significance of traffic control measures in terms of the development’s initial phase.

The Planning Commission unanimously approved the Legacy of Jackson Landing sketch plan with incorporation of conditions outlined by the planning director in the draft resolution. Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve the sketch plan for Legacy Jackson Landing as supported by an attached finding of fact. Commissioner Ours seconded and the motion passed unanimously. There was some discussion on getting more community participation for the Planning Commission and on the requirements for living in the local boundaries, and the time frame of living in the town to be involved with the planning issues. As that was the final issue to review for recommendation, the meeting was then adjourned at 8:16pm.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission advises the Town Council on land use and development issues. The commission’s recommendations are based on local and state laws, zoning, and municipal codes. The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting of the Monument Planning Commission was scheduled for June 11 but has been canceled, according to the Planning Commission website. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028. A recording with a transcript of the meeting is also available.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Town Council, April 7 and 21 – Monument Town Council mourns loss of Jim Romanello

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council began its April 21 session by solemnly acknowledging the recent passing of Councilmember Jim Romanello, who had served the community with dedication since his 2018 election. In a moment of reflection, all councilmembers shared memories of Romanello’s commitment to transparent governance and constituent outreach, and held a brief moment of silence in his honor.

Everyone from the dais remembered Romanello warmly. Mayor Mitch LaKind lamented, “I’m missing a leg to kick under the dais tonight,” recalling that after they ran against each other for mayor in 2022 Romanello confided he was glad he hadn’t won, and added, “I’m going to miss him.” Councilmember Laura Kronick, choking back tears, said, “We hugged, bantered, argued, and laughed. Farewell, my friend.”

Marco Fiorito reflected on Romanello’s dedication and spirit of cooperation. Mayor Pro Tem Steve King observed, “We started out on opposite sides of things, but we ended up coming together. Whatever we disagreed on, he would always come back and pat me on the back.” Interim Town Manager Madeline VanDenHoek noted, “He always wanted the best for the town,” and Councilmember Sana Abbott added, “I will miss that raspy laugh of his.”

The council announced plans to place a commemorative bench along the Santa Fe Trail in his honor.

Above: Flags were flown at half-staff for five days in Jim Romanello’s honor. Photo by Michael Weinfeld.

Comprehensive PUD Amendment, Plat and Site Plan for Triview water tank

In a single unified action, the council approved all three steps necessary to expand the Triview Promontory Pointe Water Tank Facility. First, Ordinance 07-2025 amended the Sanctuary Pointe Phase 3 Planned Unit Development (PUD) to reassign 1.1 acres of open space for district use. By rezoning that newly created lot from PUD to public, the town formally consolidated it with the existing 1.37-acre tank site, creating a contiguous 2.47-acre parcel capable of housing a second 1.5-million-gallon tank.

Next, Resolution 22-2025 ratified the Final Plat for Triview Utilities Subdivision, subdividing Sanctuary Pointe Filing 8 into a 1.1-acre Lot 1 and a 24.4-acre remainder, then merging Lot 1 with the existing district property to legally define the expanded site.

Finally, Resolution 23-2025 approved the associated Site Plan, which includes new landscape buffers, fencing upgrades and construction details for the additional tank. The council emphasized the importance of the added screening along adjacent residential areas and unanimously endorsed the technical design elements.

Title 2 Code Repeal and Readoption

By a 6-1 vote, the council enacted Ordinance 08-2025: a wholesale repeal and readoption of Title 2 (Administration & Personnel) to conform local code with the November 2022 Home Rule Charter and to streamline department structures under the town manager. Among the changes, Police Department rules were realigned under manager authority, finance director duties were updated, and antiquated provisions—like obsolete municipal judge bond requirements—were removed. Councilmember Sana Abbott cast the lone dissenting vote, questioning whether some Charter references might complicate future amendments.

Old Denver Road Annexation Proceedings

Resolution 25-2025 initiated annexation of the Old Denver Road area (Annexation Petition 24-2025), finding the petition in substantial compliance with C.R.S. § 31-12-107. The council authorized staff to prepare the formal annexation ordinance and to schedule the required public hearing later this spring. Proponents noted the area’s adjacency to existing town services and its potential to support future residential development.

Loop Water Authority IGA Amendment

Continuing regional cooperation, Resolution 27-2025 amended the intergovernmental agreement establishing the Loop Water Authority. Director of Public Works Thomas Tharnish explained that the revised terms address voting thresholds and cost-sharing formulas among member districts. Though councilmembers rejected the original proposal in the April 7 meeting, their concerns were addressed in the April 21 meeting and unanimously approved the updated Loop Water Authority IGA Amendment.

Review of Draft Financial Policies

In the final discussion of the evening, Finance Director Jennifer Phillips presented proposed updates to the town’s Financial Policies Manual. Key changes include raising the target for general-fund reserves from 16% to 20% of annual operating expenditures; specifying that long-term capital projects be financed with a mix of pay-as-you-go, debt, and grant funding; and tightening investment criteria to prioritize safety and liquidity. The council directed staff to model the reserve increase’s impact on upcoming budgets and to return with a public-hearing draft on May 5.

Designation of finalists for town manager

After a closed executive session, the council unanimously approved moving two candidates forward in the town manager search. Mayor Pro Tem King reported both interviews went “very well,” naming Madeline VanDenhoek and Sylvia Simpson as the finalists. These names will remain public for two weeks before final approval.

**********

The Monument Town Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, May. 5 and 19. For more information, call 719-884-8014 or visit www.townofmonument.org. To view upcoming agendas, complete board packets, or download audio recordings of past meetings, visit https://monumenttownco.documents-on-demand.com and click on “Town Council.”

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, April 9 – Two recommendations for approval; high school students offered seat at the table

By Janet Sellers

At the Monument Planning Commission meeting on April 9, the focus was on public participation and fair review processes for land use matters in Monument. The commission emphasized the importance of transparency and community involvement.

The meeting covered public hearings for the Terrazzo Baja Commercial Development Final Plat and the Triview administration building. The commissioners discussed project details, traffic studies, and safety measures. A comprehensive traffic study is necessary for the Terrazzo development to ensure it meets local requirements and does not negatively impact traffic flow. This study will include stormwater management considerations.

The proposed final Planned Unit Development for the Triview administration building aims to consolidate utility services and administration into one location effectively. The design is intended to align with existing land use patterns and enhance the surrounding area.

Safety and infrastructure plans are being discussed for the proposed Triview building area, including vehicle maintenance and safety protocols for pedestrian crossings. Community input is important for enhancing these plans effectively because safety is a crucial concern during community interactions, particularly regarding pedestrian traffic and vehicle operations. Commissioner Danny Hours said drivers must be vigilant and slow down when approaching areas with pedestrians to prevent accidents.

Both projects received unanimous approval. Further information for the next stage of the comprehensive plan that includes the surveys for community input and focus groups is expected by the end of May, with discussions and meetings regarding the next steps soon after.

Commissioners Chad Smith, Martin Trujillo, and Donna Hatch attended the National Planning Commission meeting in Denver in late March. The conference highlighted the importance of community engagement in planning discussions, particularly regarding housing and water issues. Participants expressed appreciation for the opportunity to share insights and collaborate on these critical topics.

The commissioners indicated they felt they learned some effective tools and resources such as religious institution lands as a solution for housing in difficult areas around the Front Range, talks about water, and information on the housing crisis in Colorado. Smith indicated he will continue research in those kinds of areas. Upcoming, Monument Director of Planning Dan Ungerleider, offered to share the information and videos from the conference with the commission members for edification and solutions for many current concerns and issues that impact the community.

The Planning Commission still has two alternate commissioner vacancies open and requested participation of the community to fill the vacancies and “help shape the future of Monument.”

The meeting concluded with announcements and a call for high school student involvement in local governance. Local high school students interested in learning more about local government are encouraged to attend the Planning Commission meetings, especially to learn about the comprehensive plan process. Ungerleider indicated he is looking to bring back the student liaison program and is creating a formal program for this purpose.

The student participants will begin in the audience area, and eventually may have a seat with the commissioners, albeit non-voting seats. The comprehensive plan is for the future of the community, and Ungerleider said that “if it’s going to impact anybody, it’s going to impact our students.” Interested parties may contact Ungerleider at the Town of Monument or email him at dungerleider@tomgov.org

The community is invited to share thoughts with the town via the online website, and representatives will be present at events such as the weekly farmers market and the Fourth of July Parade. Residents also can visit the website, www.Monument2040.com.

The meeting adjourned at 6:41 pm.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission advises the Town Council on land use and development issues. The commission’s recommendations are based on local and state laws, zoning, and municipal codes. The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting is scheduled for May 14. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028. A recording with a transcript of the meeting is also available.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Town Council, March 5 – Residents discuss Monument 2040 Plan

By Laura Lucero

On the evening of March 5, the Monument Town Council (MTC) invited the community to join in a discussion of the Monument 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A comprehensive plan is required for communities with a population over 2,000. According to the town’s webpage, “The comprehensive plan will serve as a long-term blueprint, guiding the community’s growth over the next 10-15 years and addressing critical areas such as housing, economic development, stormwater management, parks, and a special focus on the downtown area.”

According to the Town Council-Planning Commission Workshop held on Sept. 25, 2024, the Comprehensive Plan:

  • Is developed through public participation and input.
  • Establishes and guides community vision.
  • Reports and expands upon community goals and objectives.
  • Provides the basis for land use and community development decisions.
  • Provides the basis for capital improvement planning.
  • Provides the basis for grant applications and funding.
  • Aligns the annual budget process with long-term community goals.
  • Establishes community-developed expectation for public/private investment.

The MTC hired and is collaborating with the planning and design firm The Lakota Group to organize various public engagement events for residents, business owners, students, and community leaders to share their thoughts. Before the Bear Creek Community Conversation, they had hosted 17 focus group sessions at the Town Hall and at the local YMCA.

The conversation at Bear Creek Elementary was introduced by Dan Ungerleider, director of planning for the Town of Monument, who then asked Hannah Bader from The Lakota Group to describe the evening’s format. The gathering of about 60 residents was invited to split into six groups for roundtable discussions covering the following topics:

  • Housing and Neighborhood
  • Economic Vitality
  • Parks & Open Space
  • The Downtown
  • Sustainability
  • Safety, Wellness, & Connectivity

Each table was hosted by a facilitator with a whiteboard to capture the input. Conversations were triggered by cards on the table with specific questions; e.g., “What are the biggest environmental concerns facing Monument today?”, “What types of retail stores, services, or businesses do you feel are currently missing in Monument?”, “How often do you visit downtown Monument, and what typically brings you there?”

Over the next hour, participants were encouraged to rotate through the topics in which they were most interested. Following the roundtables, the facilitators presented a debrief of the captured input from each table.

Above: Monument community members gather around a detailed map of downtown during a public workshop on March 5 to help shape the Monument 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The entire community was invited, and about 60 people showed up to share their thoughts. Residents discussed where downtown’s true boundaries lie, along with key elements the plan will address—such as transportation flow, land use, historic preservation, economic development, housing, and park access. The workshop, held in the Bear Creek Elementary School gym, invited thoughtful input on the town’s future. Photo by Chris Jeub.

**********

The Town of Monument explains the launch and progress so far at https://www.townofmonument.org/395/Comprehensive-Plan—Monument-2040.

To view specific project information and the presentation from the Community Conversation, please visit https://www.monument2040.com/. Residents are encouraged to provide input via the online survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/FNF8FPC.

Laura Lucero can be contacted at lauralucero@ocn.me

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, March 3 and 17- Monument Town Council tackles planning, water issues, and community events

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council met twice in March to engage in planning, business development, and water infrastructure, and to continue its search for a permanent town manager. Here’s a combined recap of the key decisions made in both meetings.

Comprehensive Plan seeks community input

A presentation from the Lakota Group, a community planning and urban design firm based in Chicago, outlined the vision for the upcoming Monument 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Andy Cross, the presenter, emphasized the plan’s commitment to being “community-led and community-driven,” highlighting the importance of incorporating resident feedback to shape the town’s future development. The plan outlines a three-phase process: building a foundation of planning knowledge, testing ideas, and developing a framework of strategies to achieve a unified vision, all while being guided by the community.

The Lakota Group emphasized a central goal to allow people to express opinions and influence Monument’s future by:

  • Strategic Roadmap: The Comprehensive Plan serves as a roadmap, outlining Monument’s long-term vision and growth strategy for the community.
  • Guidance for Development: The plan informs the decisions the town has to make on land use and zoning.
  • Community Vision: The Comprehensive Plan ensures the citizens of Monument will be able to use their opinions, values, and goals when designing for planning.
  • Policy and Direction: The Comprehensive Plan creates policies for what kind of developments need to be in the community.
  • Evolving: To ensure the relevance of future projects, it’s crucial that it can evolve to the community’s changing needs.

For more information on the Monument 2040 project, see page < 1 >.

Dairy Queen drive-thru coming to Monument Marketplace

Ordinance No. 05-2025 concerned a final planned unit development for a new retail building at Jackson Creek North Retail within the Monument Marketplace. The building will house a Subway restaurant as well as the highly anticipated Dairy Queen. Dan Ungerleider presented the proposal, detailing site plans, landscaping, and architectural elements. Council members voiced concerns regarding landscaping standards and building color scheme. Ultimately, the council unanimously approved the ordinance, clearing the way for Dairy Queen to open its doors tentatively in October.

Regional water partnership explores reuse possibilities

Resolution No. 15-2025 called for authorizing a project participation agreement with the Pikes Peak Regional Water Authority. The agreement involves a study exploring the potential for indirect potable reuse of water resources across the region. Director of Public Works Tom Tharnish explained that the study aims to gather data and insights beneficial to all participating members, who are largely located in El Paso County, with the exception of Palmer Lake.

Community recognizes officer’s dedication

During the public comment portion of the March 3 meeting, Executive Director of Tri-Lakes Cares Haley Chapin shared a letter written by a staff member commending Officer Kelly Fisher for her outstanding dedication to the Monument community. The letter highlighted Fisher’s commitment to public safety, crisis intervention, and fostering positive relationships with local businesses.

Annual Report highlights 2024 achievements

The March 17 meeting commenced with the presentation of the 2024 Annual Report. Council members commended staff on the well-organized and comprehensive report, which highlights key projects and accomplishments from the past year. In summary, the report highlighted several key accomplishments:

  • Website redesign: Implemented a comprehensive website redesign, improving accessibility and reflecting the town’s natural surroundings.
  • Staff development: Town staff engaged in diverse professional development opportunities, increasing expertise and contributing valuable insights.
  • Records management: The establishment of a records manager position, as well as the acquisition of a new electronic records system to modernize and streamline procedures.
  • Community events: The continuation of several beloved annual community events such as Concerts in the Park, a Memorial Day Ceremony, The Fourth of July Parade and Street Fair, and the annual Tree Lighting event.
  • New businesses: Monument continued to grow, welcoming My House Cafe, KVRR Hospitality Group, the Colorado Pinball Pub, Whataburger, and 7-Eleven in to the town.
  • Staff recognition: Recognized Police Department members’ various contributions.
  • Finance department improvements: Implemented a self-collected local sales tax and managed the town finances with constant staff throughout the year.
  • Public Works facility improvements: Water infrastructure upgrades and energy savings projects such as solar being added to Town Hall and LED lighting in all buildings.
  • Planning Department review: Reorganized and re-established the department’s development review program and streamlined it.

The full report is available on the town’s website for public review at https://www.townofmonument.org/documentcenter/view/4770.

Well water infrastructure upgrades planned

Resolution No. 18-2025 concerned an amendment to an engineering contract for the design and engineering services needed to address high iron content in Wells 11, 12, and 13. Tharnish presented the issue, explaining that the wells, despite initial testing, exhibited elevated iron levels after being put into service, resulting in resident complaints about taste and discoloration.

The resolution proposed contracting with 4-H Associates, the same firm that designed the initial well systems, to develop an iron removal system for the wells. While the project is just for engineering, the estimated cost is about $500,000 for the infrastructure build. Council members discussed the scope of the design work, potential costs, and the long-term impact on the town’s water infrastructure. Council unanimously approved the resolution, directing staff to contract for all three systems.

Taste of Tri-Lakes returns

Haley Chapin of Tri-Lakes Cares returned to make public comments during the March 17 meeting to promote the Taste of Tri-Lakes event scheduled for May 14 at Spruce Mountain Ranch. She highlighted the event’s unique format, similar to the TV show Chopped, where local chefs create dishes using secret ingredients from the food pantry.

Town manager search update

At the March 17 meeting, the Town Council discussed the next steps in the ongoing search for a permanent town manager. With applications in hand, the next step is to schedule executive meetings with candidates. Town Attorney Bob Cole highlighted the process that the town has to take. After the interviews, there is a 14-day waiting period. An announcement is expected in April.

**********

The Monument Town Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, April 7 and 21. For more information, call 719-884-8014 or visit www.townofmonument.org. To view upcoming agendas, complete board packets, or download audio recordings of past meetings, visit http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on “Town Council.”

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, March 12 – Promontory Pointe water tank project recommended for approval

By Janet Sellers

On March 12, the Monument Planning Commission discussed the Promontory Pointe water tank project, which includes a $7 million American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) grant for a new 1.5-million-gallon tank. The project requires rezoning 1.1 acres from the current Planned Unit Development (PUD) to final plat approval, and a major amendment to the Sanctuary Pointe PUD plan. The expanded site will include a concrete containment wall and screen wall. Landscaping and Americans with Disabilities Act plans were also discussed.

The project team, including NES Inc. and the Triview Metropolitan District, emphasized the need for additional water storage to meet growing demand. Public comment for this project was addressed regarding the new tank, which will be the same height as the old tank with only minor visibility changes, if any, for neighboring properties. The Planning Commission voted to approve this project for recommendation to the Town Council.

The meeting also highlighted community engagement efforts and the importance of public input in the planning process for Monument 2040, for which there is a web page and input availability for local residents.

This planning process is referenced on the Town of Monument website: “On January 6, 2025, the Monument Town Council launched the Monument 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update, enlisting the planning and design firm, The Lakota Group, to lead the community through the planning process. The comprehensive plan will serve as a long-term blueprint, guiding the community’s growth over the next 10-15 years and addressing critical areas such as housing, economic development, stormwater management, parks, and a special focus on the downtown area.”

The community is invited to share thoughts with the town via the online website, and representatives will be present at events such as the weekly farmers market and the Fourth of July Parade. Residents also can visit the website, www.Monument2040.com.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission advises the Town Council on land use and development issues. The commission’s recommendations are based on local and state laws, zoning, and municipal codes. The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting is scheduled for April 9. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028. A recording with a transcript of the meeting is also available.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Town Council, Feb. 6 and 21 – Beacon Lite business withdraws annexation request after concerns from new board

By Chris Jeub

Monument Town Council business in February included filling its last council seats and gifting the town staff with additional paid vacation. Resolutions and ordinances surrounding the development of property on Beacon Lite Road were voted upon, reconsidered, and ultimately tabled to alleviate concerns expressed by new councilmembers and neighbors over traffic, safety, and tree removal. The month ended with one of the applicants withdrawing its application, but another very similar application was granted. The council also discussed a controversial bill making its way through the Colorado State Legislature and convened to executive sessions to discuss how to legally proceed with the Dec. 28 investigation report. Refer to the February ((www.ocn.me/v23n2.htm#mtc) and January ((www.ocn.me/v23n1.htm#mbot) issues of OCN for background information on the investigation.

New board members

Seven seats exist in the Town Council, two of which are the mayor and mayor pro tem. Mitch LaKind, formerly a councilmember, was elected mayor in November and newly elected Steve King was appointed mayor pro tem. Of the remaining five seats, Jim Romanello continues to serve out his term and Kenneth Kimple and Sana Abbott were elected in November. Two seats were left vacant from LaKind’s previous seat and the resignation of Redmond Ramos in December.

The Town Council interviewed five applicants for the two positions. Referencing the independent investigation of town management over the Home Rule Charter, Mayor LaKind asked the same question of all five candidates, “Do you believe the Home Rule Charter violates any part of the U.S. Constitution?” All candidates answered “no.”

Above: Deputy Town Clerk Tina Erickson gave the oath of office to two new Monument Town Council members at the council meeting on Feb. 21. (L to R) Marco Fiorito and Laura Kronick were sworn in to fill two vacancies caused by the resignation of Redmond Ramos and the promotion of Mitch LaKind to mayor. Photo by Michael Weinfeld.

Other councilmembers asked questions on how they would handle situations that would come up to the board. Tom Penewell expressed concern with recent yelling and shouting at town meetings but admitted surprise at how little there was this night. Jason Gross expressed the need to get zoning and water right. Roman Peek expressed the desire to keep a small town feel in Monument. Marco Fiorito, who ran for this seat and lost in the November election, and Laura Kronick referenced their previous work with the town.

At the end of the Feb. 6 meeting, Fiorito and Kronick received the most votes from the councilmembers and were appointed to the two positions on the board. They were sworn in on Feb. 21. All seven councilmember positions are now complete:

  • Mitch LaKind, mayor (elected 2022, serving Term 1)
  • Jim Romanello, councilmember (elected 2020, serving Term 1)
  • Steve King, mayor Pro Tem (elected 2022, serving Term 1)
  • Sana Abbott, councilmember (elected 2022, serving Term 1)
  • Kenneth Kimple, councilmember (elected 2022, serving until next regular election)
  • Marco J. Fiorito, councilmember (appointed 2023, serving until next regular election)
  • Laura Kronick, councilmember (appointed 2023, serving until next regular election)

Vacation gift for staff

In January, LaKind offered to gift town staff with two weeks’ paid vacation as amends for “low morale” during December’s independent investigation. Town Manager Mike Foreman brought several suggestions of how to implement this gift while explaining several of the problems associated with it. Questions of administration, fairness, equitability, and whether productivity would remain high were discussed. Public safety for granting free vacation to water and police departments was also a concern.

A total of four options were offered with the strongest recommendation being accepted by the council: Close town hall intermittently (10 separate eight-hour days) and provide Water and Police Department employees with 80 hours of administrative leave with required depletion by the end of the year.

Beacon Lite LLC

On Feb. 6, two resolutions and two ordinances involving the annexation and zoning of Beacon Lite LLC, a commercial property currently part of El Paso County, were opposed by two of the five councilmembers before swaying a third, leaving interim town attorney Robert Cole to encourage the council to reconsider and table the resolutions until the next meeting. Town Planner Shawn Snow presented details of the annexation explaining unanimous support by the Planning Commission and recommended approval by the town staff. Even so, King and Kimple voted against the zoning of the property to Light Industrial (LI), and though Abbott voted for the resolution, she voted against the ordinance.

The vote followed public comments expressing concern primarily over the condition of Beacon Lite Road, which is maintained by El Paso County. A petition signed by 188 neighbors asked the council to consider the overall impact of all the developments along the road, not just one. Citizen Mike Kopycinski, speaking on behalf of the petitioners, expressed that they would also like to see right-turn lanes, sidewalks, the preservation of trees, proper setbacks, minimal heights, and minimal water usage for any new applicant on Beacon Lite Road.

John Clark, the applicant, seemed to agree with these concerns, asking the council to “put pressure” on the county to improve the road. “I understand the concerns,” he said, “but we’re a small 5-acre lot who is getting stuck between a rock and a hard place.” Romanello encouraged citizens to complain to the county rather than deny a business fair use of the property. “I am very empathetic to the problems with the road there,” he said, “but I’m hoping these 188 people call the county and complain,” and added, “why put a stranglehold on a loyal business with something that is a county issue?”

King and Kimple did not vote against the annexation but voted against the zoning. King explained he was fine with the applicant’s use of the property but concerned that it could be sold and used for purposes he didn’t like. “I don’t want to be tied to a rezoning.” Kimple added, “My concern is safety and accessibility; that road is just inadequate.” Though Abbott voted for the first ordinance, she voted against the second without giving a reason why. “[Since] the annexation passed but the zoning didn’t,” Cole explained, “the applicant has the right to pull out.” King asked, “Can we have more discussion on this?” The council then motioned to reconsider and table the decisions till the next council meeting.

An executive session, public hearing, resolution and two ordinances were on the Feb. 21 agenda but removed at the beginning of the meeting due to the announcement that Beacon Lite LLC withdrew its application for annexation into the town of Monument. A reason for withdrawal was not given. Beacon Lite LLC remains in the county.

XL3 rigging

A similar ordinance passed 5-0. Ordinance No. 04-2023 read, “An Ordinance Amending the Official Zoning Map of the Town of Monument Rezoning 5.0 Acres From Commercial Center (CC) Zone District to Light Industrial (LI) Zone District for Property Known as XL3 Rigging Located on Beacon Lite Road Consisting of 5.0 Acres.” Snow presented details of the application.

Like Beacon Lite LLC, XL3 Rigging is a 5-acre parcel located along Beacon Lite Road, presently vacant and zoned commercial with the county, whose applicant would like to develop within Monument like other light industrial properties along the road. The Planning Commission unanimously approved the rezoning of Light Industrial and the staff approved. Brett Leveque of XL3 Rigging explained to the board that the company consisted of six employees with an expected traffic of 30 trips per day. The rigging “provides equipment-moving services to companies throughout Colorado.” The land use would consist of F-150s and small trucks.

Questions from the council led to a disagreement over trees. King asked, “How can we save the trees?” and referenced the town municipal code to give Director Sheila Booth the authority to approve or deny removal of the trees. Kimple added concerns for trees being removed along Interstate 25. LaKind countered, “I’m more concerned about the residents on the west side than what the view is by people driving by at 75 miles per hour on the east side.” He added, “If [the applicant] goes commercial [with the county], they’d be able to take all the trees down.” Kimple did not reply.

Before voting, King explained, “In fairness to the last applicant [Beacon Lite LLC], I am in favor of this project [XL3 Rigging] as it sits in front of us, which is the reason I am voting yes, in that those trees get saved.” The ordinance passed unanimously.

Discussion of state control of local zoning

The council discussed concern over a proposed state initiative to take control of zoning decisions from local municipalities like Monument. King brought up the issue. “There is an agenda from the current governor that wants to increase high-density housing. The biggest problem is [the state] changing the zoning requirements that takes away our local control. We believe in local control, but we need participation from our local community to write letters and push back.”

“It’s the idea of losing local control, which we literally got just a month ago,” LaKind added before asking residents to voice their concerns to their state representatives. Romanello proposed that a proclamation be written opposing the initiative, and to encourage the county commissioners to do the same. Kronick asked, “Is there any type of template we can direct to residents?” King volunteered to draft a template. A citizen asked that the Town Council publish information about the high-density laws coming from the state.

Investigation discussed in executive sessions

Both council meetings in February went into executive sessions to receive legal advice from the new interim lawyer on specific questions relating to the report of investigation findings dated Dec. 28. The report made accusations of impropriety and recommended censuring councilmembers and firing the town manager. Since the findings were released, several decisions were made without legal representation, including moving forward with the elected charter and rescinding the town meetings that publicly discussed details of the investigation. LaKind promised to continue the investigation under his tenure but insisted on setting new legal counsel in place before proceeding. Attorney Cole is advising the Town Council on how to proceed.

**********

The Monument Town Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next two regular meetings are scheduled for Monday, March 6 and Monday, March 20. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, Feb. 3 and 18 – Discussions on code enforcement, PPRBD, Jackson Creek, and Silver Key Senior Services

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council convened on Feb. 3 and 18 to discuss infrastructure updates, municipal code revisions, and strategic planning. Presentations covered regional development trends and a major roadway project, while council deliberations centered on ordinances, public concerns, and strategic priorities.

Code Enforcement Overview

Monument Police Chief Patrick Regan led a detailed presentation on the town’s code enforcement process, focusing on how complaints are handled and the role of Police Services Aides (PSAs). Complaints are first assessed for jurisdiction; if they fall under the town’s authority, PSAs attempt informal resolution. If issues persist, formal notices and citations follow. The town’s fine structure starts at $250 for a first offense, rising to $500 for a second and $1,000 for a third. Violators may contest citations in municipal court.

Councilmembers debated the enforcement timeline, particularly concerns over extended compliance periods. Mayor Pro Tem Steve King advocated for stricter deadlines, cautioning against judicial discretion that might delay resolutions. However, some violations, such as vehicle removal or extensive property cleanups, require additional time. The town’s compliance rate stands at 95%, indicating general effectiveness. The council urged residents to report violations via the online code enforcement tracker rather than through elected officials, ensuring a faster response.
Pikes Peak Regional Building Department Annual Report

Greg Dingrando, spokesperson for the Pikes Peak Regional Building Department (PPRBD), presented regional construction trends, including Monument-specific data. The 2024 report showed a 7% increase in new single-family home permits across the region. However, Monument’s permits declined by 30%, from 276 in 2023 to 193 in 2024—the steepest drop in El Paso County.

Commercial construction also fell, with 302 new permits issued—25% fewer than the previous year. Meanwhile, 16,000 roofing permits were issued due to past hailstorms. Regional inspectors conducted 296,429 inspections, averaging 1,100 daily.

Dingrando also highlighted major projects, including the $14 million Monument Warehouse development and the construction of three new well houses for water infrastructure. Additionally, the PPRBD introduced public permitting classes, including a Homeowner Permitting Course to assist DIY builders.

Jackson Creek Parkway

Public Works Director Thomas Tharnish and Steve Murray of FHU presented the 90% design plans for the Jackson Creek Parkway expansion. The project will widen the road from Higby Road to Highway 105, adding four lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, and a landscaped median. Construction is expected to take 12 to 18 months, pending funding.

A regional water quality pond, projected to cost $2.2 million, would benefit both Monument and El Paso County, but funding from multiple stakeholders remains unresolved. The total project cost is $15.7 million, leaving a $9 million funding shortfall.

Interim Town Manager Madeline VanDenHoek emphasized the need for discussions on addressing this shortfall, including budget reallocations and regional collaboration. Councilmembers explored potential funding sources, such as federal grants and developer contributions.

Ordinance 04-2025: Monument Municipal Code revisions

The council held a public hearing on Ordinance No. 04-2025, revising Title 1 of the Monument Municipal Code. Town Attorney Bob Cole detailed key updates, including deleting outdated sections and clarifying election procedures—now requiring mail ballot elections unless otherwise specified.

The ordinance also maintains the town’s maximum fine of $2,650, unchanged since 2013. While future automatic Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases are allowed, the council opted to review inflation adjustments before implementing any fine increases. The ordinance was unanimously approved.

Ordinance 03-2025: affordable housing and condominium debate

Mayor Pro Tem King moved to indefinitely table Ordinance 03-2025, which would have required owner-occupied units within multifamily developments to encourage homeownership. He argued that Colorado’s construction defect laws have stifled condominium development, reducing affordable homeownership options.

King criticized the state’s housing policies, stating, “The condominium market has been all but destroyed by frivolous lawsuits, making it nearly impossible for developers to provide entry-level homeownership opportunities.” He warned against excessive rental growth, stating, “If we do nothing, Monument risks being overrun with apartments that fail to serve our long-term housing needs.”

Councilmembers agreed on the need to balance development with sustainable housing policies. Several developers expressed interest in discussing alternative strategies to promote homeownership. The council unanimously voted to table the ordinance for further discussion.

Resolutions approved by the council

The council approved several resolutions by unanimous vote:

  • Final Plat for Woodmoor Placer Replat B: A commercial subdivision north of the YMCA, including a new fire station.
  • Final Plat for Falcon Commerce Center Park and Signage: Featuring landscaping and a seating area but no designated parking.
  • Auditing services contract: DMC Auditing & Consulting was awarded the 2024 financial audit contract for $16,800, with options to extend for two additional years. King and Councilmember Jim Romanello participated in the selection process.
  • Colorado Department of Transportation intergovernmental agreement (IGA): Addressing stormwater infrastructure and road improvements at Highway 105 and I-25 northbound offramp. Classic Homes will cover initial construction costs, though Monument assumes future stormwater maintenance.

Public comment: Silver Key Senior Services relocation

During public comment, Silver Key Senior Services CEO Jason DeaBueno addressed the council regarding the nonprofit’s impending displacement from Grace Best Elementary. Serving 700-plus Monument seniors, Silver Key provides food, transportation, and social services. With Grace Best slated for demolition, Silver Key urgently needs a new location. DeaBueno thanked the town for past support and emphasized the need for a permanent facility. Mayor Mitch LaKind encouraged council members to tour Silver Key’s main campus to better understand its impact.

**********

The Monument Town Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, March 3 and Tuesday, March 17. For more information, call 719-884-8014 or visit www.townofmonument.org. To view upcoming agendas, complete board packets, or download audio recordings of past meetings, visit http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on “Town Council.”

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, Feb. 12 – Commission reduces development density for key projects; Dairy Queen and Subway approvals recommended with landscaping condition

By Janet Sellers

On Feb. 12, the Monument Planning Commission rescheduled the review the construction of a retaining wall and storm sewer bypass of the Triview Promontory Point Water Tank Project on Higby Road. The wall, outside the project’s property line, raises concerns about property use and coordination. The board debated its authority to approve the wall, concluding it lacked jurisdiction. It also reviewed roadway standards, noting a 24-foot width for the project compared to 20-22 feet in other developments.

Despite supporting the project’s design, the commission voted to deny the appeal for the retaining wall, citing lack of authority and concerns about erosion control. The planning director will continue working with the developer and town staff to find a path forward on the Higby Road right-of-way improvements. The Planning Commission will have further discussions with the Town Council regarding the road width standards and criteria. This portion of the meeting concluded with a decision to adjourn for 10 minutes and reconvene later that evening.

The Planning Commission reconvened the meeting and addressed several key projects. The Connexus Lot 2 proposal by Meritage Homes was approved for recommendation to the town, reducing density to 6.9 units per acre from 10, with 158 lots and amenities. The Baja Terrazzo commercial development, reducing from 25 to nine lots with individual stormwater ponds for each lot, was also approved for recommendation to the Town Council. The Monument Marketplace North Lot 2 final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Dairy Queen and Subway was approved for recommendation to the Town Council, with conditions for landscaping and traffic impact.

The meeting also focused on approving a new zoning map, which is now accessible online and includes clickable features for detailed property information. Significant changes from 2024 to 2025 include a rezoning of a single-family home to commercial business. The map will be updated throughout the year, and a header indicating changes from the previous year will be added. The Comprehensive Plan update will begin on March 3, with community engagement sessions planned. Additionally, the stormwater management plan and a development impact fee study are underway. The meeting concluded at 8:44 p.m.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission advises the Town Council on land use and development issues. The commission’s recommendations are based on local and state laws, zoning, and municipal codes. The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting is scheduled for March 12. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028. A recording with a transcript of the meeting is also available.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Above: Monument Market Place North Lot 2 vicinity map. Courtesy the Town of Monument

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Town Council, Jan. 6 and 21 – Monument enters new year with Legislative Platform, Buc-ee’s opposition

By Chris Jeub

Community members urged the Monument Town Council (MTC) to oppose Palmer Lake’s proposed annexation for a Buc-ee’s development during heated public comments at January’s meetings. Meanwhile, the council reviewed updates on the Falcon Commerce Center and approved new Planning Commission appointments, a Vision Statement for the town, and resolutions related to infrastructure improvements.

Oaths of office

At the first MTC meeting of 2025, the swearing-in of returning officials highlighted the evening. Incumbents Marco Fiorito, Kenneth Kimple, Laura Kronick, and Jim Romanello renewed their oaths of office. The council also reaffirmed Steve King as mayor pro tem, continuing his leadership alongside Mayor Mitch LaKind. The council’s current governance remains unchanged, with LaKind, elected in 2022, continuing as mayor, and councilmembers Sana Abbott, King, and the re-elected members representing their respective districts and at-large positions.

Later the council gave attention to appointing members of the Planning Commission. Resolution No. 05-2025 was unanimously approved, officially naming Martin Trujillo, Daniel Ours, Ray Egley, and Donna Hatch to the commission. Additionally, the Town of Monument announced two open alternate seats on the commission, inviting community members to apply and contribute to the town’s planning initiatives.

Legislative Platform

The town presented a new item called the “2025 Legislative Platform,” something Mayor LaKind said was never done before. The platform outlines the town’s priorities and advocacy positions for the upcoming year. It focuses on empowering local governance, protecting Monument’s autonomy, and advocating for the town’s interests at state and federal levels. Key priorities include transportation improvements, support for local law enforcement, maintaining municipal control over land-use decisions, and ensuring equitable access to resources.

The platform opposes unfunded mandates, burdensome regulations, and legislation that diminishes municipal authority, while promoting infrastructure upgrades, affordable housing initiatives, and cybersecurity advancements.

LaKind expressed reservations about the town becoming an internet service provider, citing examples like Fort Collins where similar ventures resulted in significant financial losses. He emphasized the importance of avoiding unnecessary risks to the town’s fiscal stability. Additionally, both the mayor and Abbott raised concerns about the inclusion of artificial intelligence in town operations, pointing to its lack of regulation and the potential challenges it could pose. The plan was presented in draft form by the town staff in the Jan. 6 meeting and ratified in the Jan. 21 meeting.

Buc-ee’s opposition seeks Monument support

At the Jan. 6 meeting, members of Integrity Matters, a local nonprofit, led an organized appeal urging the town to oppose Palmer Lake’s proposed annexation of land at the southwest corner of I-25 and County Line Road for a Buc-ee’s development. During public comment, Katherine Gayle, chief legal counsel for the group, emphasized their action against Palmer Lake, claiming that Buc-ee’s would harm local businesses, disrupt Monument’s small-town character, and drain critical resources like water. Citizens echoed these concerns, highlighting issues such as traffic congestion, light pollution, wildlife displacement, and potential declines in property value. Many in the packed room voiced similar fears about the annexation’s long-term impact on the community.

Not everyone in attendance opposed the development, however. One remote participant reminded the council of the “unintended consequences” of rejecting past annexation opportunities for the property. Noting prior protests against residential development ultimately left the landowner with limited options, leading to the current proposal with Palmer Lake. Monument now has less control over the outcome, she claimed.

In response to the public input, councilmembers expressed support for Integrity Matters and residents’ concerns. Councilmember Kenneth Kimple proposed drafting a letter of opposition, citing 88 emails he had received against the project. Mayor Pro Tem Steve King encouraged strong community turnout at future meetings to amplify opposition, while Councilmember Laura Kronick urged residents to continue voicing their concerns.

Higby Road

At the Jan. 6 meeting, James McGrady of the Triview Metropolitan District presented a detailed plan for the Higby Road Widening Project, which aims to address congestion and improve safety from Jackson Creek Parkway to Harness Road. The project, with an estimated cost of $12.6 million, will be executed in two phases: the first phase extending from Bowstring Road to Harness Road and the second phase from Jackson Creek Parkway to Bowstring. McGrady emphasized the need for the improvements, citing the growing traffic volumes from Lewis-Palmer High School and surrounding neighborhoods. Key elements include widening the road, constructing new roundabouts, adding sidewalks and multi-use paths, and improving ingress and egress in the event of emergencies.

McGrady highlighted the safety benefits of roundabouts, which reduce crash rates and improve traffic flow compared to traditional intersections. Additionally, the plan incorporates a multi-use path along the south side of Higby Road to support pedestrian and bicyclist access, with specific attention to student crossings near Lewis-Palmer High School. The project will include center medians, sidewalks, and bicycle lanes to accommodate multimodal transportation.

The project’s funding relies on a mix of general obligation bonds, developer contributions, and a portion of the district’s mill levy and sales tax revenue. McGrady explained that the road was previously mismanaged before its annexation by the Town of Monument, which initiated efforts to modernize the infrastructure. McGrady emphasized the importance of moving forward to support the growing needs of the community and enhance road safety for all users.

Town’s new Vision Statement approved

At the Jan. 6 meeting, a strategic planner presented a draft Vision Statement as part of the town’s 2026-28 Strategic Plan. The Vision Statement emphasizes Monument’s commitment to being a “safe, welcoming, and productive community” that empowers individuals and families to thrive while preserving the town’s small-town charm and natural beauty. It acknowledges Monument’s growth as a gateway to the Pikes Peak region and stresses a balance between responsible development and maintaining the community’s unique character. The Vision Statement also outlines key commitments, including fostering transparency in governance, delivering high-quality town services, protecting natural resources, and supporting thoughtfully planned growth.

A slide comparison of the Vision Statement revisions showcased minor adjustments to language, enhancing clarity and focus. LaKind expressed support for the edits, stating they better reflected the community’s values. Councilmembers Kimple, Abbott, and Kronick echoed his approval, highlighting the importance of preserving Monument’s small-town appeal while accommodating growth. The council unanimously approved the Vision Statement, setting the foundation for the Strategic Plan.

Situated at the gateway to the Pikes Peak region, the Town of Monument stands out as a friendly, close-knit community that offers both a sense of small town charm and access to the conveniences and amenities of modern living. In recent years, the popularity and opportunities available in this area of Colorado, including Monument, have resulted in significant growth and development. Amidst this change, the vision and commitment of the Town of Monument remains steady: To ensure a safe, welcoming and productive community that empowers individuals and families to prosper together and enjoy the quality lifestyle that they desire. Forecasting into the future, Monument will remain prepared and capable of balancing responsible growth and development while continually meeting the needs of its residents and preserving its unique small town character all have come to admire and appreciate, including protecting the inspiring natural surroundings which the community values and respects.

The strategic planner concluded the presentation by outlining the next steps in the planning process, which include identifying strategic priorities that will guide policy and initiatives in the coming years. This Vision Statement serves as the cornerstone for the plan, shaping the town’s goals and ensuring alignment with the community’s aspirations for the future.

Falcon Commerce Center Final PUD approved

At the Jan. 6 meeting, representatives from NES and the developers of Falcon Commerce Center presented updates on the multi-phase project, detailing the planned industrial and commercial development. The project, spanning 214 acres, includes areas for civic, industrial, medical, and office uses. Key infrastructure improvements, such as the extension of Terrazzo Drive, were highlighted, with NES contributing $480,000 toward traffic signal enhancements.

Despite these efforts, councilmembers raised concerns. King expressed unease about contaminants in the stormwater basin, while Kimple criticized the traffic situation and suggested that the development would worsen congestion on the west side. Kimple also objected to the proposed building colors, preferring earth tones over U.S. Air Force Academy-inspired designs.

King and Fiorito underscored the growing traffic issues, with Fiorito noting that even in “perfect weather,” congestion remains a problem, and 18-wheel trucks would exacerbate the issue. King described the situation as “a giant mess,” while Kimple questioned the overall impact on Terrazzo Road, pointing out that decisions made by CDOT to add a roundabout have not resolved the core challenges. Councilmember Romanello countered the concerns, calling the extended delays “ridiculous,” demanding a vote to move forward.

Though concerns remained prominent, the council ultimately voted 7-0 to approve the updated plans. Fiorito and Kimple reiterated their reservations about the traffic implications and building aesthetics, with Fiorito stating he would like something other than “big white buildings.” Despite the unanimous approval, the council acknowledged the need for ongoing diligence in addressing traffic flow, environmental impacts, and design standards as the project progresses.

**********

The Monument Town Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, Feb. 3 and Tuesday, Feb. 18 (Monday, Feb. 17 is Presidents’ Day). For more information, call 719-884-8014 or visit www.townofmonument.org. To view upcoming agendas, complete board packets, or download audio recordings of past meetings, visit http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on “Town Council.”

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, Jan. 8 – Commission elects Trehill as chair, hears concerns about traffic and access for Woodmoor Placer Replat B

By Janet Sellers

At the Jan. 8 meeting, the Monument Planning Commission elected Martin Trehill as chair and Chad Smith as vice chair.

At the first public hearing for the Woodmoor Placer Replat B final plat, the project was approved, with concerns about traffic and access addressed. The second hearing approved the final plat for Falcon Commerce Center Park and Signage. The third hearing for Connexus Lot 2 was continued to Feb. 12. The meeting concluded with updates on the Comprehensive Plan and a development impact fee study, emphasizing community and developer outreach. Apologies were made for technical and other errors in the meeting.

The commissioners look to provide a calendar and schedule for the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update process, including opportunities for Planning Commission involvement. The commissioners also expressed frustration about the lack of detail in the minutes regarding split votes and discussed the importance of including detailed findings of fact in the minutes, given that there had been considerable discussion regarding the various significant issues brought forth in the December meeting resulting in a split vote.

As reported in the January issue of OCN, the commission had approved recommendations in a Dec. 11 meeting for the sketch plan for the Woodmoor Placer Replat B, a commercial subdivision along Jackson Creek Parkway. This is awaiting approval from the Monument Town Council. This development, aimed at accommodating growing community needs, includes six lots and will focus on shared access roads, pedestrian pathways, and utility easements. The commissioners emphasized their desire to ensure the architecture of the Woodmoor Placer Replat B development is compatible with the surrounding area during the site plan review process.

**********

The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting is scheduled for Feb. 12. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Buc-ee’s community meeting elicits strong response

By Jackie Burhans

On Dec. 3, Buc-ee’s hosted a public meeting at Palmer Lake Elementary School’s cafeteria to provide information about its development plan for a Buc-ee’s travel center at the southwest corner of I-25 and County Line Road. The meeting, moderated by Mark Waller, former El Paso County commissioner and current development consultant, was attended by over 250 people crowding into the small cafeteria and was covered by multiple print and TV news outlets. Attendees included outgoing Palmer Lake Trustee Nick Ehrhardt and Monument Mayor pro-tem Steve King.

Waller, who did not introduce himself, warned attendees that he would not allow shouting and interruptions, noting this would cut down on speaking time. Craig Dossey, former county planning director and now president of Vertex Consulting Services, presented information about the development process and current property zoning. Also in attendance was Stan Beard, Buc-ee’s head of development, who presented an overview of the store’s plans and operations. The presentations, which generated a lot of negative feedback, were followed by a question-and-answer period.

Dossey laid out the types of businesses allowed by the current zoning, noting that both Monument and Palmer Lake included the property in their respective three-mile plans as commercial zoning. He noted that Buc-ee’s is at the beginning of the process and had Senior Executive Consultant Nina Ruiz detail the steps remaining before development could begin.

Attendees were instructed to sign up to speak. Speakers expressed concern with the weather and traffic issues on Monument Hill, disagreement over the desirability of having freeway drivers stop in the area, the willingness of the community to fight this development, the impact of light pollution on nearby residents, the high density of wildlife migration, and the low level of preparation of presenters to address these issues.

One attendee asserted that this is a bedroom community with people making $100,000 a year whose kids are headed to college for whom working at Buc-ee’s would be beneath them. Buc-ee’s representatives attempted to address the issues by saying they would comply with every regulation imposed on any developer of this property, including funding improvements of the I-25 interchange if need be.

Attendees added that they didn’t understand why Buc-ee’s chose this location, that they had issues with people from Texas coming into the state and with suggestions that Buc-ee’s consider locating in Fountain or Pueblo. They also raised water availability issues, noted the increase in electric vehicles, and expressed concerns about groundwater pollution and human trafficking.

Some attendees appreciated Buc-ee’s coming to a hostile environment, thanked them for hosting the meeting but disapproved of the development. One local developer, Matt Dunston, who owns a vacation rental property in Palmer Lake, said people naturally feared change. He said he had asked many questions, was satisfied with Buc-ee’s answers, and expressed disappointment in being loudly heckled.

Beard noted that Buc-ee’s came to get feedback and tried to address everything they could. Waller directed people to visit www.buceespalmerlake.com for more information. Attendees asked that community members bring this level of energy to the annexation eligibility hearing scheduled for Dec. 12 in Palmer Lake.

Above: Buc-ee’s hosted a community meeting on Dec. 3 at the Palmer Lake Elementary School cafeteria. A crowd of over 250 attendees, including local town officials and print and TV press members, stretched the room’s capacity. Consultants Mark Waller of Waller Consulting Ltd., Craig Dossey and Nina Ruiz of Vertex Consulting Services, and Stan Beard from Buc-ee’s conducted the meeting. After brief presentations by the consultants on the development process and the property’s history, Beard gave an overview of Buc-ee’s business model. During the question-and-answer period, attendees brought up concerns about traffic, weather, lighting, pollution, and wildlife. Most speakers opposed the development, with very few bringing up positive points. Buc-ee’s directed the public to www.buceespalmerlake.com for more information while attendees asked the public to attend the annexation eligibility hearing on Dec. 12 at Palmer Lake Town Hall.
Above: Palmer Lake resident and federal biologist Dailee Fagnant pointed out Monument Hill’s unique geographical location and meteorological patterns. She noted there are major wildlife crossings in the area and an increase in animal strikes during the post-rut migration season. She expressed concerns that folks from out of state would be hitting wildlife they are not used to. She asked if Buc-ee’s had done its job of researching species movement and planning to mitigate the danger. Fagnant said that Buc-ee’s seemed ill-prepared, showing only a generic traffic slide and wasting time describing what it sells, and asked if Buc-ee’s had worked in an urban area with a high-density wildlife corridor. Stan Beard, head of Buc-ee’s development, responded that Buc-ee’s would follow every rule that is required by federal, state, and local government. From left, Fagnant addressing Beard, and Craig Dossey, president of Vertex Consulting Services. Photos by Jackie Burhans.

Jackie Burhans can be reached at jackieburhans@ocn.me.

Other Palmer Lake articles

Monument Town Council, Dec. 2 and 16 – Council faces $3.9 million budget shortfall, hears call for fiscal sustainability

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council grappled with a $3.9 million potential budget shortfall during its December meetings, emphasizing the need for fiscal sustainability in 2025. Other discussions included development projects, natural medicine regulations, and energy improvements.

Budget resolutions and fiscal challenges

The council reviewed and approved several budget-related resolutions across both meetings:

  • Resolution No. 56-2024: Adoption of the amended and restated 2024 budget.
  • Resolution No. 57-2024: Appropriation of funds for 2024.
  • Resolution No. 58-2024: Adoption of the 2025 budget, projecting $11.6 million in revenue against $15.4 million in expenditures. Staff highlighted the need for mid-2025 adjustments to address sustainability concerns.
  • Resolution No. 59-2024: Appropriation of funds for 2025.
  • Resolution No. 60-2024: Certification of the 2025 property tax mill levy.

Jennifer Phillips, Monument’s newly appointed finance director, provided a detailed analysis titled “Final Proposed 2025 Budget,” highlighting the need for fiscal restraint. While the 2025 budget anticipates $11.6 million in revenue, projected expenditures total $15.4 million, leaving a nearly $3.9 million gap.

“This is not sustainable,” Phillips cautioned, urging the council to consider mid-2025 adjustments to balance the budget. Measures already in place include freezing four employment positions, with further changes anticipated by May or June of the coming year “to get a better handle of our finances,” as stated by Phillips.

Key points from the budget discussions included:

  • A $1.4 million increase in police funding since 2022, raising the total to $6.3 million in 2025.
  • Clarifications regarding a $15 million depreciation in the Water Fund, representing long-term depreciation rather than liquid cash.
  • Sales tax revenue assumptions of a 2% increase, despite challenges with large businesses not paying the full 3.5% tax rate.

The council unanimously approved several budget-related resolutions, including the amended and restated 2024 budget, the 2025 budget and property tax mill levy certification, and appropriations for both years. Recognizing the need for further adjustments, the council committed to revisiting the budget mid-year.

Jackson Creek North

A resolution concerning the preliminary and final plat subdivision for Jackson Creek North PMD Filing No. 1 failed to move forward at both meetings. The 25.63-acre property at the intersection of Higby and Bowstring Roads was proposed by CSI Development Inc. for sale preparation and included a 30-foot public right-of-way dedication to accommodate Higby Road improvements. The plat would dedicate two tracts of land for open space and a detention pond to the Triview Metropolitan District (TMD).

During the Dec. 2 meeting, Planning Director Dan Ungerleider assured the council that the right-of-way dedication would accommodate road improvements, as verified by town engineers. However, the TMD was not present to confirm the application, raising concerns among councilmembers. Mayor Pro Tem Steve King questioned the absence of a finalized road design, while Mayor Mitch LaKind and Councilmember Kenneth Kimple emphasized the need for additional clarity before moving forward. The lawyer representing CSI stressed that significant time and money had been invested in the project and suggested that Triview’s absence should be interpreted as implicit approval. Despite this, a motion to table the resolution was passed, with further discussions scheduled for Dec. 16.

At the Dec. 16 meeting, the council postponed a decision once again to Jan. 6, 2025, to allow the TMD to present a formal response addressing concerns about road design and additional clarity.

Natural medicine business regulations

The regulation of natural medicine businesses, commonly referred to as “mushrooms,” was discussed extensively during both meetings. Ordinance No. 24-2024, formally titled “An Ordinance Amending Section 18.03.380 and Adding Article 5 to Chapter 18.04 of the Monument Municipal Code Concerning the Regulation of Natural Medicine Businesses,” was introduced to align with the Natural Medicine Health Act of 2022. This act, approved by Colorado voters, decriminalizes the personal possession and supervised use of specific psychedelic substances, including psilocybin mushrooms, for individuals aged 21 and older, while allowing local governments to regulate the time, place, and manner of operation of licensed facilities.

The ordinance establishes zoning districts for these facilities and imposes distance restrictions from childcare centers, schools, and residential areas. Town Attorney Bob Cole clarified that while outright prohibition was not legally permissible under Colorado state law, zoning regulations could provide structured oversight. A draft zoning map received positive feedback from the council during the Dec. 2 meeting.

On Dec. 15, public comments included support from Monument resident Vincent Bruno, a licensed professional who highlighted the benefits of natural medicine in treating PTSD. Bruno urged the council to adopt regulated frameworks to prevent unregulated activity. Without further discussion, the council approved Ordinance No. 24-2024.

Energy performance improvements

The council approved Ordinance No. 25-2024, authorizing a lease/purchase agreement to fund energy performance upgrades for town facilities. Interim Town Manager Madeline VanDenHoek explained the project, which follows an energy audit conducted in partnership with the Colorado Energy Office and Veregy. The audit identified several areas where the town’s buildings could benefit from efficiency upgrades, both to reduce energy costs and to replace aging mechanical systems.

Key upgrades in Phase 1 of the project include:

  • Installation of LED lighting in all town buildings.
  • Solar energy systems at Town Hall and the Public Works Building.
  • Exterior sealing and door sweeps to improve energy efficiency.
  • HVAC upgrades, including a VVT system at Town Hall and new units at the Public Works Building.
  • Advanced energy monitoring and control systems for all buildings.

The total cost of Phase 1 is $1,337,181. The improvements are projected to save the town about $1.15 million over the lifespan of the upgrades through energy savings, rebates, and reduced maintenance costs.

Mayor Pro Tem King questioned the costs and necessity of some upgrades, but VanDenHoek highlighted the need to modernize the town’s infrastructure and the long-term financial benefits of the project. The ordinance passed unanimously.

Property transfer agreement

The council unanimously approved an ordinance authorizing the transfer of real property related to the town’s water tank on Beacon Lite Road. Ordinance No. 26-2024 formalizes a property exchange agreement between the Town of Monument, Comcast of Colorado/Pennsylvania/West Virginia LLC, and I-25 Properties Ltd. The agreement resolves title and boundary issues discovered during due diligence for a 2021 property purchase intended for the construction of a new municipal water tank.

Key provisions of the ordinance include:

  • Resolution of legal descriptions and title defects on both the old and new water tank sites.
  • Dedication of portions of land for rights-of-way and easements along Beacon Lite Road to El Paso County.
  • Reimbursement of Comcast’s legal fees and closing costs up to $34,000 as part of the agreement.

This property transfer ensures the town can proceed with constructing a new water tank, a critical infrastructure project for Monument’s water system.

The council will revisit several key issues, including the Jackson Creek North PMD plat and potential amendments to natural medicine zoning regulations, during the next scheduled meeting on Jan. 6, 2025.

**********

The Monument Town Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, Jan. 6 and Tuesday, Jan. 21 (Monday, Jan. 20 is MLK Day). For more information, call 719-884-8014 or visit www.townofmonument.org. To view upcoming agendas, complete board packets, or download audio recordings of past meetings, visit http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on “Town Council.”

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, Dec. 11 – Planning Commission recommends approval of Panda Express and Falcon Commerce Center

By Janet Sellers

At the Monument Planning Commission meeting on Dec. 11, key land use decisions were made, including approval of the final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a Panda Express restaurant and progress on the Falcon Commerce Center development.

Panda Express

Planned for Lot 5A of Monument Marketplace North, the new Panda Express would feature a drive-thru, landscaping, parking, and pedestrian access. While the commissioners expressed concerns about the building’s design, particularly its blank wall facing Jackson Creek Parkway, no public objections were raised, and the project was recommended for approval pending design refinements.

Falcon Commerce Center

The Falcon Commerce Center development was also reviewed, focusing on its environmental and infrastructure impacts. The development includes industrial warehouses and distribution facilities with substantial investments in water, sewer, and road infrastructure. The commissioners discussed efforts to address concerns from the Air Force Academy about Jackson Creek’s downstream conditions, including the installation of a buried wall to prevent erosion. The project’s shift from less restrictive PID zoning to a more controlled PUD ensures it aligns with the town’s comprehensive plan.

While the development has made significant strides, commissioners raised concerns about truck parking, traffic impacts, and the facility’s visual compatibility with the community. They also sought assurances about hazardous material handling and fire safety. No public comments were submitted during the hearings, and the project is now awaiting Town Council approval.

In addition to these discussions, the commission approved the sketch plan for the Woodmoor Placer Replat B, a commercial subdivision along Jackson Creek Parkway. This development, aimed at accommodating growing community needs, includes six lots and will focus on shared access roads, pedestrian pathways, and utility easements.

The commission’s ongoing dialogue with developers aims to balance growth with sustainability and community needs. As 2024 concluded, the Planning Commission was preparing for a busy January, which will include discussions on impact fees and leadership appointments. The meeting wrapped up with holiday well-wishes and appreciation for the year’s work.

**********

The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. It will revisit the discussion on the Jackson Creek North plat and Panda Express at the next meeting on Jan. 8. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Nov. 5 Election Results for Monument and Palmer Lake

Town of Monument

The Town of Monument elections on Nov. 5 were for councilmembers representing Districts 1, 2, and an at-large seat. In District 1, Laura Kronick ran unopposed and secured the seat with 100% of the vote (2,060 votes). In District 2, voters were tasked with choosing two representatives. Kenneth W. Kimple won one of the seats with 52.23% of the vote (2,107 votes), while Marco P. Fiorito missed with 47.77% (1,927 votes). For the at-large seat, Jim Romanello won with 52.53% of the vote (3,116 votes), defeating Chad M. Smith, who received 47.47% (2,816 votes). Swearing in will be in January.

The elections included two ballot initiatives. Ballot Question 2B, which proposed an amendment to expand the area within the town’s home rule charter, passed with strong support, receiving 71.05% of the vote (5,160 votes). However, Ballot Issue 2A, which sought to increase lodging taxes by $220,000 annually to fund town-owned parks, lodging tax administration, and compliance, was rejected by voters, with 52.55% voting against (3,842 votes) and 47.45% in favor (3,469 votes).

Town of Palmer Lake

The Town of Palmer Lake elections on Nov. 5 were for Mayor and three open spots on the Board of Trustees. Glant Havenar was elected Mayor with 51.2% (863 votes). Shana Ball received 48.5% (821 votes). Tim Caves, Amy Hutson, and Atis Jurka were elected to the three open spots on the Board of Trustees receiving 25.91% (854 votes), 22.51% (742 votes), and 20.51% (676 votes), respectively. Alex Farr and Jacob Hansen received 16.47% (543 votes) and 14.59% (481 votes), respectively. The mayor and three new trustees will be sworn in at the December meeting.

**********

Full election results are posted at https://clerkandrecorder.elpasoco.com/elections/2024-records-results/

Additional Monument coverage starts on page < 6 >.

Additional Palmer Lake coverage starts on page < 8 >.

Monument Town Council, Nov. 4 and 18 – Monument Council addresses budget, watershed, community initiatives

By Chris Jeub

Monument Mayor Mitch LaKind opened the Nov. 4 meeting by addressing a tragic hit-and-run accident earlier that day which resulted in the loss of life. He commended the swift response of local police and fire departments in managing the situation and called for a moment of silence to honor the victim. Later, the suspect involved in the incident turned themselves in, according to local authorities.

LaKind also read a proclamation recognizing Nov. 4-8 as Law Enforcement Records Personnel Week. The proclamation highlighted the crucial role these professionals play in supporting law enforcement through tasks like maintaining criminal justice statistics and aiding in suspect apprehensions. It praised their professionalism, efficiency, and compassion in serving the community and acknowledged their essential contributions to public safety.

Two Monument police officers were sworn in, and one was promoted at the Town Council meeting on Nov. 18.

Above: The new officers are (L to R) Joshua Teeples and Anthony Sealey. Teeples’ wife Leah pinned the badge on her husband and Sealey’s wife Alexandra did the same for her husband. The hirings bring the total number of officers to 29. Chief Patrick Regan says there’s room for one more officer in the budget.

Joshua Teeples (left) and Anthony Sealey are sworn into the Monument Police Department (52 sec)

Joshua Teeples says he’s proud to be joining the Monument Police Department (28 sec)

Anthony Sealey says he’s proud to be joining the Monument Police Department (30 sec)

Above: After the new policemen were sworn in, Officer Christopher Sullivan was promoted to sergeant. His son Kieran had some trouble pinning the badge on his father. He jumped when his dad jokingly shouted, “Ouch!” Photos by Michael Weinfeld.

Town of Monument budget presentations

The 2024 Amended Budget for the General Fund was reviewed, highlighting an increase in the unreserved fund balance from 16.46% in the approved budget to 30.76%. Key contributors to the change included adjustments to prior beginning balances tied to audited 2023 financials, adding $300,000 in investment earnings and a $175,000 reduction in user charge revenue due to a lack of funding from Triview for the comprehensive plan. While the improved fund balance was noted, council members expressed concern over the reliance on investment earnings and reduced revenue streams, emphasizing the need for sustainable financial strategies.

The 2024 Amended Budget for the Water Fund increased the ending fund balance from $3.2 million to $18.2 million, driven by adjustments to prior balances, reallocation of reserves, and spending cuts. Key reductions included $750,000 from booster station upgrades and $450,000 from the valve and pipeline replacement program, offsetting overspending on Wells 11, 12, and 13. A contingency expense of $180,000 was reclassified for repairs, while vehicle and equipment spending dropped by $250,000. However, expenses rose by $260,000 for a new pipeline, and $2.75 million was removed from Forest View Water Tank improvements. Council members discussed balancing immediate infrastructure needs with long-term water fund sustainability.

The proposed 2025 Water Fund budget projects an unreserved fund balance of $4.8 million, with notable changes to expenditures. Revenue adjustments include a $300,000 reduction in investment income due to the completion of the COP bond and reallocated rent revenue from the 259 building. On the expenditure side, the budget allocates $600,000 for the design of a new Public Works building, $290,000 for an Impact Fee Study and consulting services, $180,000 for contingency funds directed to well maintenance, and $342,000 for increased well repair needs. Additionally, the budget reflects a $3 million removal for the Monument Hill Water Tank project, $800,000 cut from booster station expenses, and a reduction in administrative fees following reorganization of staff roles. Council discussions emphasized the importance of managing costs while ensuring the Water Fund’s operational efficiency.

Later in the meeting, Councilmember Steve King sought to clarify inaccuracies in a recent Our Community News (OCN) Letter to the Editor regarding the town’s budget. King asked Town Manager Madeline VanDenHoek and Chief of Police Patrick Regan to confirm key points on the record. VanDenHoek affirmed that the town is not operating under a budget deficit, while Regan stated that the Police Department’s budget has not been reduced and is, in fact, higher than the previous year.

Regan clarified that funds designated for specific purposes, like 2F, cannot legally be diverted, and there is no plan or mechanism to “defund the police.” King emphasized that the letter’s claims were inaccurate and misrepresented the council’s financial planning efforts. LaKind added his criticism, claiming the letter “completely disingenuous” and called for more constructive engagement.

Note: Councilmember Kronick has written a letter of response in this issue. See the letter on page < 19 >.

Rezoning ordinance approved for 574 N. Washington St.

The Monument Town Council unanimously approved Ordinance No. 23-2024, rezoning the property at 574 N. Washington St. from Downtown Business (DB) to Single-Family Detached Medium Density (SFD-2). Staff recommended approval of the ordinance. During the discussion, Councilmember Sana Abbott inquired about the impact on surrounding properties, while King asked about potential uses under the new zoning, with staff clarifying that the property could accommodate, at most, a duplex.

The property owner explained that the site was originally subdivided in the 1990s for a business bike shop and updated to comply with residential codes for commercial upgrades. The ordinance restores the property to residential zoning, aligning with its intended use.

Fountain Creek Watershed District projects update

Alli Schuch, executive director of the Fountain Creek Watershed District, provided an update on the district’s efforts to manage the 927-square-mile watershed spanning nine regional governments. She highlighted the challenges of the highly erratic watershed, shaped by dramatic elevation changes, erosive soils, and increased water flows due to infrastructure like the Southern Delivery System (SDS). These conditions result in flooding, erosion, and sedimentation issues, compounded by rapid population growth and water usage.

Schuch detailed various initiatives, including watershed restoration projects funded through a $50 million settlement tied to the SDS, educational outreach programs, and collaboration with landowners to mitigate erosion. However, she emphasized the district’s struggle with limited funding, underscoring the need for sustainable solutions.

Schuch also discussed new developments aimed at long-term watershed health, including a proposed wetland mitigation bank to offset development impacts and generate sustainable funding. She addressed specific local concerns, such as the Jackson Creek project, which involves multiple stakeholders, including the Air Force Academy and El Paso County, to address severe erosion and habitat loss.

By forming a Monument Creek watershed group and securing a $350,000 grant for scoping efforts, the district aims to restore critical areas while balancing environmental protection and community needs. Schuch concluded by stressing the importance of collaboration and proactive management to address shared risks and preserve the watershed for future generations.

Councilmembers King and Romanello expressed strong support for the district’s efforts. King recounted observations from a recent watershed tour, noting the severe downstream impacts of erosion, including collapsing cliffs, unusable roads, and compromised infrastructure. He highlighted the need to prioritize upstream solutions, offering examples of local challenges caused by complex water rights.

Romanello echoed the importance of addressing upstream issues, pointing out that downstream projects risk failure without them. He also highlighted the district’s financial constraints, which rely on voluntary contributions and grants, and warned against waiting for catastrophic events to drive funding, referencing past Colorado floods. Both councilmembers reinforced the value of proactive measures and collaboration to secure the watershed’s future.

Heart of Monument Park design update

Cassie Olgren, Parks and Trails planner and program manager, presented the final design update for the Heart of Monument Park, a collaborative effort led by the Monument Hill Kiwanis Club and supported by the Monument Community Presbyterian Church. The project aims to create a universally accessible playground and park in downtown Monument, incorporating community and stakeholder input gathered over the past two years.

The design features Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)-compliant playground equipment, additional ADA parking, and pathways connecting to nearby trails and sidewalks. NES, the design firm, developed plans to integrate the space with the adjacent Water-Wise Demonstration Garden. Generous contributions from the Colorado Springs Health Foundation and other donors have supported the project, with more grants and fundraising efforts underway.

The project is divided into phases, with Phase 1 focusing on site preparation, playground construction, parking, and connecting sidewalks, targeting a 2025 groundbreaking and 2026 completion. Future phases include exercise equipment, shade structures, and landscaping extensions to the Water-Wise Garden, offering flexibility to adapt to evolving community needs.

Olgren emphasized the project’s inclusive nature, with ramp-accessible structures for all abilities, and highlighted the importance of community partnerships in bringing the park to life. Final vendor selection and detailed cost estimations will follow the release of a request for proposals, enabling further progress toward making this long-awaited community project a reality.

New book chronicles Monument Cemetery history

During public comments, Michael Weinfeld and John Howe presented their new book, Shootings, Killings, and War Heroes: The History Hidden in Monument’s Cemetery, a detailed expansion of their 73-page report delivered last year. Inspired by Councilwoman Laura Kronick’s suggestion, the duo authored a 140-page volume filled with over 100 historical and contemporary photos and captivating stories about the individuals buried in Monument Cemetery. The book reveals previously untold accounts and fun facts about the cemetery’s history.

The book was released on Nov. 30 with a signing event at Covered Treasures Bookstore, where guests enjoyed cookies and cake while they waited to have their book signed. Copies will also be available at the Tri-Lakes Chamber of Commerce, the Lucretia Vaile Museum in Palmer Lake, and on Amazon. Howe and Weinfeld expressed gratitude to the town for covering publishing costs and encouraged everyone to explore the fascinating stories they uncovered through their volunteer-driven project.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Dec. 2 and Dec. 16. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, Nov. 13 – Board discusses Jackson Creek North plat; Panda Express public hearing moved to December

By Janet Sellers

At its Nov. 13 meeting, the Monument Planning Commission reviewed a request for approval of the preliminary and final plat for the Jackson Creek North Planned Multi-use District (PMD) owned by CSI Development. It noted that Higby Road will be widened from 70 to 100 feet for public improvements.

The discussion focused on safety improvements and a subdivision plat that dedicates land for stormwater management and waste control, without requesting development approval.

Note: A “final plat” specifically refers to a detailed, legally approved map of a subdivided land parcel, showing exact property boundaries and lot dimensions, while a “final plan” is a broader term encompassing the complete set of approved design drawings for a project, including architectural, site, and engineering plans, which may include a final plat as one component within the larger set of documents.

The meeting’s extensive plat discussions confirmed that the area does not yet have a development plan in place, which will go through the appropriate processes in the future. The commission approved recommending the plat request, emphasizing the importance of addressing public health and safety for the future plan. A motion was made and approved to recommend the plat to the Town Council, including a detailed study of Jackson Creek Parkway’s roadway construction and traffic impacts.

During public comments, a local parent and a staff member expressed concerns about child safety near Lewis-Palmer High School, emphasizing the need for sidewalks.

There are still unanswered plan questions, which will have to have to be addressed when a future development plan is proposed. At that point, after a plan has gone through the appropriate process, if there are questions, the town will have discussions and sometimes debate with the community. In the case of any disagreements, there is always the opportunity to bring that plan to the Town Council to appeal.

The public hearing for the Panda Express restaurant and drive-thru at Monument Marketplace was continued to the next Monument Planning Commission meeting on Dec.11 due to incomplete transportation studies affected by some technical issues.

**********

The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. It will revisit the discussion on the Jackson Creek North plat and the Panda Express at the next meeting on Dec. 11. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, Oct. 9 – Commission raises concerns about ultimate use for Jackson Creek North

By Janet Sellers

The Oct. 9 Monument Planning Commission meeting began with roll call, with all but commissioner Greg Collins present in person. Collins was present online. Discussions focused on the rezoning of 574 N. Washington St. and the preliminary and final plat for Jackson Creek North. The commission unanimously approved the rezoning of the property on North Washington Street to align with the comprehensive plan for single-family detached housing. However, concerns were raised regarding the adequacy of the right-of-way for future road improvements and the potential impact on downstream water flow for Jackson Creek North.

Insights from the meeting regarding Jackson Creek North included an analysis based on the Review and Approval Criteria established in section 18.02.260.C of the town’s regulations, alongside discussions and concerns raised during the meeting. The proposed Final Plat for the vacant property does not satisfactorily meet the criteria outlined in the town’s section 18.02.260.C, the commissioners said.

Key areas of concern included the lack of established ultimate use, inadequate service capacity provisions, insufficient information on cost-sharing for improvements, and limited consideration of natural hazards and conservation. Future developments will require more comprehensive planning to address these deficiencies and ensure compliance with town regulations.

The commissioners engaged in extensive discussions about the implications of zoning changes, including considerations for mixed-use development. Topics included residential height limits, stormwater management, and the legality of zoning across hundreds of acres in future developments in the area as well. The commission decided to continue the public hearing to seek legal advice, planning to reconvene in a Nov. 13 meeting with the town attorney present.

Amid the discussions, the commissioners said the proposed Final Plat for Jackson Creek North did not establish the ultimate use of the property and did not demonstrate compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan, or other plans adopted by the town. This non-conformance raised concerns regarding the alignment of the proposed development with the town’s long-term goals and vision.

The property is currently vacant and undeveloped, and the proposed Final Plat does not sufficiently address how it will ensure compatibility with adjacent properties, commissioners said. This lack of assessment could lead to future conflicts as development progresses. The proposed Final Plat creates a single lot, lacking insight into future development patterns. Additionally, it does not adequately address the impact on light, air, parks, open spaces, and other public uses, contrary to the expectations set forth in the Review and Approval Criteria.

Due to the absence of development plans, the proposed Final Plat cannot confirm the provision of adequate, safe, and efficient public improvements, utilities, and community facilities, the commissioners said. Ensuring sufficient service capacity is critical, and its absence poses significant concerns for future development.

It also does not provide the necessary development details to establish the property owner’s responsibility for onsite and offsite community improvements and facilities, failing to meet the requirements regarding cost-sharing for infrastructure improvements, the commissioners said.

While the proposed Final Plat addresses some natural hazards by dedicating an easement for wetland drainage and creating two tracts for open space and detention, it does not sufficiently cover protections against other natural hazards, such as fire, flood, or geological risks, the commissioners said. In addition to wetland drainage and open space tracts, the proposed Final Plat provides limited opportunities for the preservation and conservation of significant vegetation stands, which does not align fully with the requirements for natural conservation.

Although the proposed Jackson Creek North Final Plat adheres to technical requirements of form and content, it lacks adequate information to verify compliance with local, county, state, and federal regulations, the commissioners said. This lack of detail raised questions about the viability of development plans.

Future development on this property will necessitate the submission of a Site Plan, which must comply with the underlying zoning designation and development review criteria established in the Land Development Code. Additional modifications to the Final Plat may be required based on the forthcoming development plan and relevant codes and ordinances.

The meeting concluded with discussions on potential updates to the development code.

**********

The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. It will revisit the discussion on the Jackson Creek North plat at the next meeting on Nov. 13, with the town attorney present to address legalities. For further information on Planning Commission meetings, please visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment or contact 719-884-8028.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Town Council, Oct. 7 and 21 – Council discusses finance, nonprofit work, employee survey

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council meetings on Oct. 7 and 21 covered the unanimous approval of a new revenue and finance ordinance, updates from local nonprofits Tri-Lakes Cares and the Pikes Peak Small Business Development Center (SBDC), the results of the town’s first employee satisfaction survey, and public feedback on council stipends and council feedback on a new playground at Limbach Park.

Revenue and finance ordinance

The Monument Board of Trustees voted 7-0 to approve a comprehensive ordinance updating the town’s tax and business regulations. The new rules introduce several changes aimed at improving compliance and streamlining administrative processes. One key change caps the vendor’s fee at $100 per return while maintaining the current rate of 3.33% for timely tax filings. To further encourage digital submissions, the town will begin charging a $25 fee for manual paper filings, which were previously free.

The ordinance sets a fixed interest rate of 1% per month on overdue taxes, replacing the former rate tied to the Colorado State Banking Commission. Penalties for fraud will also be revised, with a new penalty set at either 50% or 100% of the unpaid amount, pending final determination. For repeated violations, a special penalty will be enforced, requiring payment of the greater of 25% of the unpaid tax or $250.

The ordinance also allows the town to recover audit costs by billing taxpayers directly for the time and resources involved. The newly passed regulations repeal and replace existing sections of the municipal code, adding new provisions to better align the town’s business licensing, revenue management, and finance operations with its current needs.

Tri-Lakes Cares updates

Tri-Lakes Cares (TLC) representatives Haley Chapin and Bill Lyons provided an update on the organization’s efforts to address the growing needs of residents in northern El Paso County. TLC is a nonprofit that offers essential services such as food assistance, rent and utility support, car repair aid, medical help, and financial counseling to families and individuals in crisis. The organization serves as a lifeline for those facing unexpected hardships, ensuring that basic needs are met with dignity and care.

Chapin and Lyons emphasized the increasing demand for these services, noting that 58% of households enrolled in TLC programs live below the federal poverty line—$31,200 annually for a family of four. Rising housing costs, rent, and a growing population have added strain to many residents, highlighting the importance of community support. One success story shared involved a mother of two who, after losing her job, was able to stay in her home thanks to TLC’s rent assistance and eventually secured full-time employment.

Both Chapin and Lyons expressed heartfelt gratitude to the Town of Monument for its continued financial support, stressing how critical it is to the organization’s ability to serve the community. “This funding goes a long way,” they said, noting that it helps cover essential costs like rent and utilities for struggling families. They also pointed to TLC’s recent community needs assessment, which aims to keep the organization ahead of emerging challenges in the region.

Pikes Peak SBDC updates

Brandon Eldridge, executive director of the Pikes Peak SBDC, provided an update on the center’s activities and impact. SBDC offers free consulting, training programs, and events to help local businesses grow and thrive. Eldridge mentioned its collaboration with the Tri-Lakes Chamber of Commerce, where it provides coaching and educational presentations to businesses throughout the area.

Eldridge highlighted the Veterans Small Business event held at Great Wolf Lodge on Nov. 1, as well as the popular “Year of AI” presentation, which provided valuable insights into artificial intelligence for the business community. He emphasized that SBDC’s consulting hours—126 so far this year—are offered at no charge, making a significant impact on the success of local entrepreneurs. Eldridge encouraged attendees to sign up for the SBDC’s newsletter to stay connected with future programs and resources. Mayor Mitch LaKind also commented on the presentation, noting several photos featuring Danny Meyer, a friend and entrepreneur, which reflect the center’s deep ties to influential community members. Eldridge closed by thanking the Town of Monument for its ongoing support, stressing that such partnerships are essential to SBDC’s mission of empowering businesses and fostering economic growth.

Employee satisfaction survey

Emily Trujillo, Human Resources manager for the town, presented the results of Monument’s first employee satisfaction survey, conducted from Sept. 5 to 12 using software BambooHR. Designed to ensure anonymity and encourage honest feedback, the survey asked two simple questions: employees’ likelihood to recommend the town as a place to work and suggestions on what makes the workplace great or how it could improve. With an 80% participation rate, the survey provided valuable insights, Trujillo said. Key positives included people, culture, community, atmosphere, and leadership, while areas of concern focused on compensation, communication, recognition, and processes.

Following the survey presentation, Trujillo outlined upcoming action plans, including a compensation survey to be completed by early 2025, initiatives to enhance communication, improved employee recognition programs, and a focus on accountability for policies and procedures. This presentation also set the stage for a discussion on seeking professional vendors to conduct an evaluation of the town manager position. Trujillo mentioned that five evaluation companies were approached, with two submitting proposals. The council discussed which vendor to select but had not reached a decision by the end of the meeting.

LaKind called the survey “a step in the right direction” but requested more detailed data, such as employee comments, and Councilmember Marco Fiorito encouraged the inclusion of longer surveys in future evaluations. Trujillo confirmed a follow-up survey with more depth would be conducted in March.

Public and board comments

Executive Director of Tri-Lakes Cares Haley Chapin spoke again voicing her support for council stipends during public comments not on the agenda. She emphasized how compensation could encourage broader participation and equity in local government.

“A stipend helps level the playing field. Without it, only those with financial flexibility might consider running,” Chapin explained. She noted that serving on the council often comes with personal costs, such as lost work hours, childcare, and transportation, which stipends could help offset. Compensation, she added, could also improve retention, reduce burnout, and attract a more diverse pool of future candidates, ensuring the community is fully represented. Chapin acknowledged that members could donate their stipends to causes like the Police Department or nonprofits but urged the council to consider the broader community benefit.

Councilmember Steve King remarked on the successful launch of the new playground at Limbach Park. He thanked Town Manager Madeline VanDenHoek and the park and public works staff for their hard work. “Every time I drive by, there’s a zillion kids out there, and it’s good to see them outside,” King said, reflecting on the playground’s popularity.

**********
The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday Nov. 4 and 18. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, Sept. 3 and 16 – Council discusses budget deficits, strategic spending, future priorities

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council met on Sept. 3 and 16 where various financial concerns were brought to light, including shortfalls in the General Fund, Police Fund, and Water Fund. The council worked to identify potential areas for spending adjustments while also tackling issues related to project prioritization, police retention, and councilmember compensation.

2025 budget review

On Sept. 3, Senior Accountant Steve Murray presented the budget outlook, which raised concerns due to projected deficits in some of the town’s primary funds. The General Fund was forecasted to run a deficit of $2.663 million, with revenues projected at $11.672 million and expenditures totaling $14.335 million. Despite this, the fund would maintain a balance of $424,355 in unreserved funds by the end of 2025. The 2F Police Fund was also projected to face a shortfall of $65,358, though it would retain a healthy reserve of $667,741 due to a strong beginning balance. Meanwhile, the Water Fund faced a larger deficit of $4.639 million, leaving only $146,335 in unreserved funds. The 2A Water Fund, however, was in a stronger position, with a deficit of $407,801 but set to end the year with a much larger reserve of $7.04 million.

The conversation focused on finding ways to tighten spending and potentially defer certain projects. Mayor Mitch LaKind highlighted the discrepancy between revenue and expenditure, noting that “there’s quite a bit in the hole … more expenditure than revenue.” Town Manager Madeline VanDenHoek advised the council to provide guidance on which projects could be deferred until 2026, considering the town’s reserves of only 2.6%. VanDenHoek also proposed delaying some parks development to 2026, pending council input. Mayor Pro Tem Steve King questioned the $200,000 cost for implementing new tax collection software, which VanDenHoek clarified would help the town better audit businesses and track collections.

In the follow-up meeting on Sept. 16, Murray provided an updated presentation after identifying additional reserves. The General Fund shortfall was revised to $2.099 million, with a beginning balance of $5.541 million and an unreserved fund balance of $1.156 million (8.43%) by the end of 2025. Adjustments included an additional $150,000 coming from the Police Department’s unreserved balance. The Capital Projects Fund faced a deeper deficit, with an unreserved balance of $4.235 million, largely due to a $9 million allocation for the Jackson Creek Parkway development. Adjustments in the Water Fund improved its outlook, leaving it with $2.614 million in unreserved funds at the year’s end.

During this meeting, the council focused on prioritizing projects, particularly around Jackson Creek Parkway. Councilmember Ken Kimple raised concerns about the implications of not funding supplemental projects, asking for clarity on their order of importance. Police Chief Patrick Regan emphasized the need to retain police officers, particularly in light of the rising cost of living. Kimple also stressed the importance of maintaining fiscal balance amid growing demands, while LaKind called for the council to make some tough decisions moving forward.

Compensation for councilmembers sparks debate

An ongoing topic of discussion throughout recent months resurfaced at the Sept. 16 meeting, with Councilmember Laura Kronick leading the charge on whether councilmembers should receive compensation for their time and effort. Kronick has been advocating for a $500 per month stipend, arguing that it would encourage more community members from diverse backgrounds to engage in public service. She emphasized that serving on the council requires significant time and effort and that compensation would make this role more accessible to those who might not otherwise be able to afford the time commitment. Councilmembers Jim Romanello and Marco Fiorito expressed their agreement, with Romanello thanking Kronick for bringing the issue forward.

However, Kimple strongly opposed the idea, insisting that the town’s limited resources should be directed toward staff and police force needs rather than council compensation, particularly during budget shortfalls. He suggested that if compensation were to be considered, it should be presented to voters as a ballot measure, arguing that the proposal appeared self-serving. Kronick disagreed, countering that putting every small decision to the voters would undermine the council’s effectiveness. King expressed mixed feelings, acknowledging that while compensation could open the door to broader participation, it might also present negative optics given the town’s current financial challenges. Despite the debate, the council ultimately left the issue unresolved.

Sales tax self-collection system update

During the Sept. 16 meeting, Sophia Hassman, sales tax consultant and owner of CoSALT Consulting Ltd., provided an update on the Sales Tax Self-Collection System implementation. Hassman reported that $37,000 had already been collected during the software implementation phase. The go-live date, originally set for Oct. 1, 2024, was pushed to Jan. 1, 2025, to better align with state records and compliance requirements. The system will allow businesses more time to adjust to the new processes, with the first tax returns due in February 2025. Future phases of the project include initiating audits, ensuring compliance, and addressing short-term rental (STR) tax compliance.

Final approval granted for Ziggi’s Coffee drive-through

Also at the Sept. 16 meeting, the council approved Ordinance No. 18-2024, granting final approval for a new Ziggi’s Coffee at 16529 Cinematic View in Monument Marketplace North. Planning Director Dan Ungerleider presented the ordinance, while concerns were raised about traffic and water drainage related to the development. LaKind acknowledged that traffic issues in the area had become problematic, a concern shared by Kronick and Kimple, who noted that traffic had significantly increased since the 2022 traffic study. The council voted 7-0 in favor of the ordinance, with Kimple urging caution to ensure that traffic does not become a “debacle.”

Looking ahead to the Nov. election

Town Clerk Tina Erickson conducted a lot drawing to determine the order of candidate names on the upcoming ballot. For the At-Large position, Romanello will appear first, followed by Chad Smith. In Residential District 2, Kimple will appear first, followed by Fiorito. Residential District 1 remains uncontested, represented by Kronick.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next two regular meetings are scheduled for Monday, Oct. 7 and Monday, Oct. 21. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission – September meeting canceled

By Janet Sellers

The Monument Planning Commission canceled its regular monthly meeting scheduled for Sept. 11. The Planning Commission’s next regular meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, Oct. 9 at 6 p.m. in the Town Council chambers at 645 Beacon Lite Road, Monument.

The Planning Commission usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/planning-commission-board-of-adjustment. Information 719-884-8028 or www.townofmonument.org.

Janet Sellers can be reached at Janet Sellers@ocn.me

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Town Council, Aug. 5 and 19 – Council charts future with key budget, development, and management decisions

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council met twice in August. Discussions centered on the proposed 2025 budget, focusing on revenue projections and critical infrastructure projects. The council also passed an election ordinance to streamline the upcoming town election and approved the final plat for the Monument Lake development. The council endorsed technology upgrades for the Town Council Chambers, appointed Madeline VanDenHoek as the interim town manager, and moved forward with a lodging tax proposal aimed at supporting public amenities.

Town of Monument presents 2025 budget proposal

On Aug. 5, Senior Town Accountant Steve Murray presented the Town of Monument’s proposed 2025 budget, focusing on sales tax revenues, fund allocations, and critical supplemental projects. The budget anticipates an 8.63% sales tax revenue increase, consistent with 2023 figures. Key allocations include directing 0.5% of sales tax to the 2F Police Fund, 50% of sales and use tax from Triview properties to Triview, and 1% to water funds, with a portion allocated to the 2A Water Fund. About 42% of the collected sales tax is projected to support the General Fund. The budget also includes $440,000 for legal expenses across various departments, covering technical and professional services.

Emphasizing infrastructure and technology, the budget outlines significant supplemental projects, such as $9 million allocated for upgrades to Jackson Creek Parkway and $10 million for constructing a new Public Works building. Other enhancements include records and budget software updates and items for the Police Department, like safety equipment and parking lot fencing, totaling around $138,500. The town plans to use restricted reserves, including $2 million for stormwater management projects, and maintain a 3% TABOR reserve.

During the council’s discussion, Councilmember Steve King questioned the necessity of all proposed impact studies, but Town Attorney Bob Cole affirmed their importance, while King stressed the value of impact fees. Mayor LaKind urged Director of Public Works Tom Tharnish to seek creative funding options through water fees.

Councilmember Ken Kimple voiced concerns about the $9 million allocation for the water Loop, noting that actual costs could potentially double. Tharnish responded by announcing a formal presentation on Sept. 3, which will provide more information about the fund. Kimple also expressed disapproval of the current council deciding future pay for councilmembers, advocating for a town ballot decision. In contrast, LaKind argued that since current members would not benefit from the vote, it should not pose an issue. The session concluded with a reminder from Interim Town Manager Madeline VanDenHoek that the budget is a “work in progress” and that this draft serves as an initial step in refining the town’s financial plan.

Election ordinance passed

The Town Council passed Ordinance No. 15-2024 with a 7-0 vote, following lengthy discussion and some disagreement with legal counsel. The ordinance, which calls for the Nov. 5 Town Regular Election to be conducted as a coordinated election, also appoints the town clerk as the designated election official and authorizes an intergovernmental agreement with the El Paso County clerk and recorder. Councilmember King, despite having reservations and concerns that were echoed by a community member, ultimately voted in favor of the ordinance due to time constraints.

Monument Lake final plat approved

During a recent public hearing, the Town Council discussed Resolution No. 25-2024, which pertains to the final plat for Monument Lake Beachfront Filing No. 1. As this was a continuation from previous meetings, Planning Director Dan Ungerleider did not give a new presentation. The proposal, first presented in June, aimed to combine several lots and allow for parking permits. Although the Planning Commission recommended approval with a 7-0 vote and staff confirmed that all review criteria were met, Councilmember King raised concerns about the status of Lake Mountain Lane being listed as a private road. Town staff clarified that while the northern road is private, the town owns the access road.

King expressed his hesitation to send the issue back to staff but questioned the process taken. Ungerleider acknowledged the complexity of the situation and noted that the final plat would clarify the ownership and access issues. Legal counsel Bob Cole confirmed that the town does indeed own the access road, which satisfied the council’s concerns. Consequently, the council unanimously passed the resolution with a 7-0 vote, allowing the project to move forward.

Town Council approves technology upgrades

Director of IT Will Williams presented a proposal to the Town Council requesting $137,000 for technology and audio-visual upgrades to the Town Council Chambers. Williams expressed enthusiasm for the project, assuring council members that the new equipment would be fully utilized and not left to “sit in a closet.” LaKind asked if the project would be completed by the end of the year. Williams confirmed that the upgrades would be finished by the middle of the fourth quarter. During the renovation, council sessions will be temporarily moved to another location. The resolution was passed unanimously with a 7-0 vote.

VanDenHoek appointed as interim town manager

In a unanimous 7-0 decision, the Town Council appointed Director of Parks and Community Partnerships VanDenHoek as the interim town manager, following Cole’s recommendation after the departure of Mike Foreman. The town had been operating under a co-manager arrangement with VanDenHoek and Police Chief Patrick Regan. Mayor LaKind motioned for VanDenHoek’s appointment, relieving Regan from his co-management responsibilities. Regan, who expressed his enjoyment working alongside VanDenHoek, stated his preference to return to his primary role as police chief. VanDenHoek accepted the interim position and agreed to the $175,000 annual salary.

Council moves forward with lodging tax proposal

During the Aug. 5 meeting, the Town Council discussed the introduction of a 5% lodging tax for hotels, short-term rentals (STRs), third parties, and truck stops, with an estimated revenue of $220,000 annually. The proposed tax, aimed at benefiting public amenities such as parks and playgrounds, would be enforced using Deckard Technology LLC to identify and ensure compliance among STRs within the town. Senior Accountant Steve Murray explained that while STRs would be managed through technology, truck stops would undergo individual audits. Mayor LaKind emphasized the importance of getting the lodging tax proposal on the ballot for the Nov. 5 election.

The formal ordinance, identified as Ordinance No. 16-2024, was introduced and voted on in the Aug. 19 meeting, following the earlier discussions. The ordinance outlines the submission of the lodging tax proposal to eligible voters and amends the Monument Municipal Code to include the new tax, contingent upon voter approval. The council unanimously passed the ordinance in a 7-0 vote, clearing the way for the issue to be decided by Monument residents in the regular town election.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Tuesday, Sept. 3 (following the Labor Day holiday) and Sept. 16. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, Aug. 14 – Proposed Ziggi’s project examined

By Janet Sellers

At the Aug. 14 meeting of the Monument Planning Commission (MPC), the commissioners considered a proposed Ziggi’s Coffee restaurant, discussed land development, and expressed concern about potential impacts of development on nearby homes and businesses. It also discussed a joint meeting with the Town Council concerning the scope of the Comprehensive Plan Update project.

The commissioners expressed concern about the orientation of buildings on Jackson Creek Parkway and suggested guidelines for development to create a welcoming look. Negotiating with developers during the preliminary process to set guidelines could limit frustration with buildings facing the “wrong direction,” starting the conversation earlier in the planning and design process.

The commission discussed the proposed development of Ziggi’s Coffee, a growing, nationwide coffee franchise, at Monument Marketplace North with the development representative and the owner. Concerns about zoning compliance, traffic generation, and pedestrian access were raised, while the developer emphasized a commitment to improving pedestrian access and addressing safety concerns. Design inconsistencies such as the drive-through design not resembling the front door and the building architecture facing Jackson Creek Parkway were physical issues of concern, as well as appropriate sidewalks.

The commissioners also discussed the visibility of new businesses in the area and the orientation of buildings on Jackson Creek Parkway. A commissioner expressed support for the project with regard to the supporting documents, while another commissioner raised concerns about safety in areas that “are not very safe.” Sign concerns were also raised, in the interest of making sure the businesses in that area will be successful.

Commissioner Ray Egley spoke up as it was noticed that the only access to the business is off what is being designated as a private road, which is off Harness Road. The concern was of snow removal and continuing maintenance of that road, not only for the businesses that are there but for the consumers who want to frequent those businesses. Commissioner Angley asked the developer, “… how would they address that, who’s taking care of that?” The developer replied that the entrance to the building is not on Jackson Creek Parkway but faces west. The owner of the business, Greg Flynn, owns five other Ziggi’s in Colorado and shared details of how the business plans to have a welcoming establishment with a fireplace indoors for atmosphere, banners at the high school, some in-house special days, and so on to show that it invests in the community.

The recommendation to approve the edifice of Ziggi’s was based on the final planned unit development for lot 4 of Monument Marketplace North, for a restaurant and drive through, supported by the display of facts on the meeting room screen and described by following documents that were shown for the site plan for the lot, prepared by MAH architectural group. Grading erosion control in site construction plans was prepared by the civil engineering group, with the drainage report for the marketplace filing 1 prepared by the same engineering group, and the traffic generation and analysis for Ziggi’s prepared by SM Roca LLC, the documents of which should include the attached findings of fact in support of the recommendation.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission usually meets the second Wednesday of each month. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. Information: 719-884-8028 or www.townofmonument.org.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Town Council, July 31 – Special Town Council Meeting Results in Town Manager’s Dismissal

By Chris Jeub

This report covers the special Town Council meeting on July 31st, 2024, which was not included in the print edition due to time constraints.

The Town of Monument held a special Town Council meeting on July 31st, 2024. The council conducted three executive sessions: one to determine positions relative to negotiations, another for legal advice on specific personnel matters, and the third concerning personnel matters involving Town Manager Mike Foreman. All motions to enter the executive sessions passed unanimously.

Following the executive sessions, the council considered Resolution No. 46-2024, which approved an employment separation release and settlement agreement for Town Manager Mike Foreman. The reason for Foreman’s dismissal was not disclosed. The resolution was discussed and passed with a unanimous vote of 7-0. No public comments were made, and the meeting adjourned.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, July 2 and 15 – Moratorium lifted; accountability discussed in response to town manager on administrative leave

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council gathered July 2 and 15 for their regular meetings, one of which lifted the town’s development moratorium. One special meeting held July 9 discussed Town Manager Mike Foreman’s paid administrative leave, but the reason for the leave has not yet been disclosed.

Moratorium Lifted

The Town Council voted 7-0 on July 2 to deny the extension of Ordinance No. 13-2024, effectively lifting the six-month moratorium that had temporarily halted the acceptance of new applications under the Town of Monument Land Development Code. The ordinance, initially put in place in January, was meant to manage a backlog and ensure proper handling of about 20 ongoing development applications.

Newly hired Planning Director Dan Ungerleider, presenting the ordinance, confirmed that many of these applications are now complete and awaiting further action from developers. He expressed confidence in handling the current demand, prompting Councilmember Jim Romanello to question the certainty of moving forward without the moratorium. Ungerleider reassured the council of the department’s capability, emphasizing the importance of being fully staffed, which is currently a work in progress.

Concerns were raised by Councilmember Steve King regarding the town’s infrastructure, including roads and the lack of a renewable water fund, as well as unaddressed impact fees. “I don’t want to get too far behind the eight ball here,” King stated, highlighting the financial strains.

Public comments were in favor of ending the moratorium. Local residents, along with representatives from the Home Builders Association (HBA) and other commercial interests, cited the negative impact of the moratorium on property rights, potential sales, and tax revenues. They argued that such measures create market unpredictability.

Town Attorney Bob Cole recommended denying the extension, a sentiment that led to a motion by Romanello to do just that. The motion passed unanimously. In the wake of the council’s decision, Ungerleider urged the development community to “restart” efforts as a service to the community, marking the official end of the moratorium. The lifted moratorium is expected to resume normal development activities.

Accountability discussed

On July 15, Councilmember Romanello initiated a discussion on amending the Home Rule Charter to enhance accountability and oversight within the town’s governance. This move comes shortly after the council placed Foreman on administrative leave due to undisclosed personnel issues.

Romanello’s proposed amendments to Sections 7.3 and 14.2 of the Home Rule Charter include instituting a new oversight mechanism that would allow another senior staff member, possibly the HR director, to report directly to the council. This aims to provide a safe avenue for employees to express concerns without fear of retaliation.

Further discussions included updating the employee manual with more active council involvement and expanding the residency requirement for the town manager to cover the town limits and the 80132 ZIP code to strengthen community connections.

It was agreed that the proposed amendments would be referred to the voters, allowing Monument’s residents to have a direct say in these governance changes, reflecting the council’s commitment to transparency and accountability.

Additionally, the agenda for the upcoming council meeting on July 31 includes two executive sessions led by Town Attorney Bob Cole. One session will address personnel matters involving the town manager, who has been notified about the session, and another will involve a conference with the town attorney to receive legal advice on specific legal questions regarding personnel matters. These sessions may provide further insights into the reasons behind Foreman’s administrative leave.

Note: Because Our Community News went to press before the July 31 meeting, updates regarding the outcome of these sessions will be made available on the newspaper’s website wp.ocn.me following the meeting.

**********

The Monument Town Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, Aug. 5 and 19. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, July 10 – Orientation workshop for new members

By Lisa Hatfield

The Monument Planning Commission held a new-member orientation workshop, instead of a formal meeting, on July 10. It was open to the public, but no action items were discussed, deliberated, or acted upon during this session.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission usually meets the second Wednesday of each month. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. Info: 719-884-8028 or at www.townofmonument.org.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Lisa Hatfield can be reached at LisaHatfield@ocn.me.

Monument Town Council, June 3 and 12 – Town manager put on administrative leave; debates on lodging tax, sign and gun laws

By Chris Jeub

In June, the Monument Town Council debated a lodging tax and sign and gun laws. Town Manager Mike Foreman was placed on administrative leave.

June 12 special meeting: Town manager placed on administrative leave

During a special Town Council meeting on June 12, in an executive session held pursuant to Section 24-6-402 (4)(f) and (4)(b) of the Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS), the council discussed personnel matters involving Town Manager Mike Foreman and sought legal advice on specific legal questions related to these matters. Town Attorney Bob Cole was present during these sessions.

Following the discussions, Councilmember Kenneth Kimple recommended that the town manager be placed on paid administrative leave. In the interim, his responsibilities will be jointly handled by Director of Parks and Community Partnerships Madeline VandenHoek and Police Chief Patrick Regan.

The Town Council has issued a press release regarding this decision, emphasizing that it was made with the community’s best interests in mind. Due to the sensitive nature of personnel matters, specific details have not been disclosed. The press release reads as follows:

“After careful consideration and consultation with legal counsel, the Town Council has decided to place the Town Manager on paid administrative leave effective immediately. We have appointed an interim Town Manager to oversee day-to-day operations during this period. We appreciate your understanding and assure you that this decision was made with the best interests of our community in mind. As this is a personnel matter, we will not be discussing specific details at this time. Thank you.”

New lodging tax ordinance discussed

The Town Council deliberated on June 3 a proposed lodging tax ordinance that would impact short-term rentals (STRs) and other lodging within the town. The proposed tax would increase town taxes by a specific percentage on lodging purchases, effective Jan. 1, 2025. The revenue generated would be retained and spent according to voter-approved guidelines.

Councilmember Steve King voiced concerns about public perception, emphasizing, “I don’t want people to think this is a tax they are paying.” Town Attorney Bob Cole confirmed that the tax includes short-term rentals, prompting King to inquire about the current tracking of STRs. Cole confirmed that no short-term rental regulations exist.

Mayor Mitch LaKind pointed out the discrepancies in STR taxes across different cities, noting, “Denver is 11%, Parker is 3%, Colorado Springs is on the low end at 2%. I think we should be 2%.” He suggested the funds be earmarked for municipal park maintenance rather than the general fund. This proposal sparked a debate. King believed the funds could support general maintenance, while Councilmember Marco Fiorito noted a potential issue: “If they go to only the town’s parks, other municipalities’ parks don’t get the funds.”

Planning Consultant Sophia Hassman identified the main sources of the proposed tax revenue as the town’s single hotel and truck stops. Town Manager Foreman raised logistical concerns, stating, “This takes a lot of administrative work, and 2% will probably not bring in what it takes to pull this off. We suggest 5%.” Mayor LaKind recommended a detailed analysis, saying, “I suggest we figure out how much this will actually bring in; also figure out where the funds will go. We come back in a month to decide.”

The council must finalize the ballot question by Sept. 2 to ensure it can be presented to the voters. The next meeting will likely see further discussions and decisions on the specifics of the lodging tax ordinance, including the proposed percentage and allocation of funds.

Lost Island II Final PUD approved

The council unanimously approved Ordinance No. 12-2024, which allows for the final Planned Unit Development (PUD) of Lost Island II, a family-oriented fun center. The approval followed a public hearing on Resolution No. 31-2024, which also passed unanimously, granting the final plat known as Conexus Filing No. 3, a replat of Conexus Filing No. 2-Lot 4.

Julie Esterl from Baseline presented the ordinance and resolution, with John Olson, the applicant and planner, detailing the project. The property, located on the west side of I-25 between the Interstate and Old Denver Highway, will feature an indoor/outdoor recreation center aimed at family fun. The approved plans for Phase 1 include:

  • Four 18-hole miniature golf courses
  • Indoor playroom with inflatables
  • Ninja gym
  • Party rooms
  • 316-space parking lot

Phase 2, which will be developed later, involves the construction of a water park funded by the revenue from Phase 1.

Councilmember Kimple raised questions about operational hours and lighting, expressing concern about the center’s impact during dark hours and its plans to serve alcohol. Olson confirmed that the center would operate from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. and assured that the owners are mindful of screening and lighting issues. Julie Esterl added that the lights would be turned off at night.

Willow Springs Ranch Final Plat approved

The council unanimously approved Resolution No. 32-2024, which grants a final plat for Willow Springs Ranch Filing No. 2. Lauren Richardson from Baseline presented the resolution.

The council recommended approving the final plat based on its compliance with the Town of Monument’s Land Development Code Section 18.02.260. The approval includes a condition related to future infrastructure developments. During the design phase of a new school site for Lewis-Palmer School District 38, the access from Forest Lakes Drive to Channel Island Drive will be evaluated. If necessary, this intersection may be converted to a right-in/right-out access. The applicant or Willow Springs Ranch Metropolitan District will be responsible for the cost of any required design and construction improvements.

Councilmember King expressed concerns about the safety of having two roads located just 100 feet apart. He pointed out potential issues with fire escape routes and emphasized that the current plans could pose safety risks. Despite these concerns, the council voted unanimously to approve the resolution.

Council reviews Temporary Sign Code

The council reviewed the Temporary Sign Code, focusing on Chapter 18.06 of the Town’s Municipal Code. The code, presented by Town Planner Dan Ungerleider, aims to regulate the design, construction, and placement of signs to safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of Monument’s residents.

The sign regulations have several key objectives. They aim to promote safety by ensuring signs do not confuse or distract motorists, impair visibility, or interfere with traffic. The code also seeks to ensure efficient communication by preventing an overload of messages, thus reducing sign clutter and enhancing the visual environment. Additionally, it aims to protect property values, foster economic development, and assist in wayfinding. The regulations are designed to be fair and consistent, providing residents with ample opportunities to exercise free speech through signs.

During the discussion, King raised concerns about the legality of the sign ordinance, citing a Supreme Court ruling against similar regulations. He expressed doubts about the flexibility for making adjustments. Kimple questioned the need for the study session, pointing out that the previous board chose not to enforce the sign code. He stressed that this topic should have been addressed earlier.

Mayor LaKind agreed, suggesting that unless there was a public demand for changes to the ordinance, it might be best to leave it unchanged. The meeting concluded without any immediate modifications to the sign code.

Firearm ordinance debated

A contentious debate unfolded around Ordinance No. 14-2024, which addresses the carrying of firearms in public spaces, contrary to state directives.

New state legislation aimed at prohibiting firearms in public areas, originally intended to restrict open carry but not to exclude individuals with proper concealed carry permits. Town Attorney Cole highlighted this distinction, emphasizing that the state’s goal was to prevent individuals from openly displaying firearms in public places.

Kimple voiced preference for the state bill, arguing that it enhances safety by designating public spaces as gun-free zones. “I think this is a good bill coming down from the State Capital,” he said.

In contrast, Police Chief Reagan, King, and LaKind advocated for local autonomy in firearm regulations. Chief Reagan noted that properly permitted citizens pose minimal risk and are not the focus of concern; instead, he emphasized the potential threat posed by criminals.

LaKind raised constitutional concerns, arguing against state overreach. “If we allow the state to do this, it overrides the Constitution,” he asserted, reflecting on the broader implications of state-imposed restrictions.

Councilmember Sana Abbott expressed reservations about allowing firearms in public spaces, questioning the necessity outside of law enforcement. “Why do we need to allow people to come in here with a weapon other than our trained officers?” Abbott queried, reflecting concerns over public safety and comfort.

King countered, highlighting the potential consequences of declaring public spaces as gun-free zones. “If this is a known gun-free zone, that makes us a target,” he cautioned, underscoring the potential unintended consequences of restrictive policies.

Ultimately, after deliberation, the council voted 5-2 in favor of the local ordinance, with Kimple and Abbott dissenting.

Final Plat for Zeal at Jackson Creek approved

Resolution No. 04-2024 was unanimously approved, marking a significant step forward for the Zeal at Jackson Creek development project.

The subject property, located in a Planned Residential District with multi-family zoning, sits adjacent to various residential and mixed-use zones in the area. The finalized plat includes critical updates such as a 30-foot right-of-way dedication along Higby Road, expanding its width from 70 to 100 feet along the property’s northern boundary. Additionally, the plat restructures utility easements to better accommodate buried overhead utilities along Bowstring Road.

Town Planner Dan Ungerleider presenting on behalf of the project confirmed that the revised plat met all town planning and engineering standards, ensuring compliance with Monument’s Development Code. Councilmember Jim Romanello sought reassurance that the resolution addressed concerns previously raised by fellow Councilmembers King and Kimple. Ungerleider affirmed that the revised plat accommodated these concerns, prompting approval from the council. The resolution passed unanimously with a 7-0 vote. Mayor LaKind expressed satisfaction with the decision, remarking, “I am glad to finally get this going!”

**********

The Monument Town Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The July 15 meeting has been cancelled. July 2 will be the only meeting in July. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, June 12 – Monument Planning Commission cancels June 12 meeting

By Janet Sellers

The following notice was posted on June 4 on the agenda page for the Town of Monument Planning Commission:

“The Town of Monument Planning Commission canceled its regular meeting scheduled for June 12, 2024. The Planning Commission’s next regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, July 10, at 6 p.m., in the town’s Council Chambers at 645 Beacon Light Road in Monument. Questions regarding this notice may be directed to the Town of Monument Clinic Department or 645 Beacon Light Road Monument Colorado 80132, or call 719-651-5405.”

**********

The Monument Planning Commission usually meets the second Wednesday of each month. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. Info: 719-884-8028 or at www.townofmonument.org.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Planning Commission, May 8 – Amusement park, more residential development recommended for approval

By Janet Sellers

The May 8 agenda of the Monument Planning Commission included a resolution for a final plat known as Willow Springs Ranch filing No. 2 and an ordinance for a planned unit development (PUD) known as Conexus Lost Island 2. Reports for communication and announcements with the commission and planning staff were also on the agenda. Public comments time was not on the posted agenda.

The commissioners’ main discussions were about the two development projects, Willow Springs Ranch final plat and Conexus Lost Island 2 PUD. Discussions highlighted the location, zoning, and surrounding land use of Willow Springs Ranch near Baptist Road and Forest Lakes Drive and the nearby roundabout, indicating the need for accommodating expected increases in traffic. Later, Ben Thurston presented the resolution for Conexus Lost Island 2 amusement park. The commissioners expressed concerns and supported the proposals, with some emphasizing the need to evaluate traffic studies and major evacuation routes, as well as respecting the small-town atmosphere of Monument.

Also at the meeting, speakers discussed various aspects of traffic management and infrastructure in Monument’s growing community, including the need for a traffic study to address evacuation routes and potential issues with roundabouts. The commissioners reviewed a proposed development plan for Willow Springs Ranch while other commissioners discussed a comprehensive review of mixed-use projects, especially of recent amusement park projects nearby in areas of Colorado Springs. The commissioners discussed proposals for a mixed-use development in a former industrial area and questioned the lack of design guidelines for a mixed-use development in a PUD. The discussion included respecting the need for the Town of Monument to preserve its small-town character feel throughout current growth possibilities.

Concerns arose regarding needed comprehensive traffic studies to be completed and understood before any building would begin, due to the expected increase in the traffic for locals coming and going as well as the traffic and its implied concerns regarding visitors to both the new home areas of the Willow Springs Ranch final plat and the new Conexus Lost Island 2 amusement sites, and for evacuation issues for all traffic, including local and interstate traffic of large trucks that must use the local streets in the case of severe weather complications.

The commissioners made a motion, unanimously approved, to recommend approval of Willow Springs Ranch if the proposed final plat conforms with the review and approval criteria as outlined in the town of Monument’s land development Code Section 8 2.0 2.260 with the condition that at the time of completion, the design of the future District 38 school at that area of Forest Lakes Drive will require conversion to a right in, right out travel ability if such intersection or access improvements are required. Also, the applicant, for the location entering the Willow Springs Metropolitan District, will be responsible for the design and construction of the road conversion. The proposed plat design preserves and conserves natural areas in vegetation. Group discussions for Willow Springs Ranch also included questions about the current validity of a previous traffic study and the potential need for new studies due to subsequent developments, zoning, and open space dedication.

Recreation development and environmental impact

The commission also heard an application sought for approval by the developer of the Conexus property along Beacon Lite Road for an amusement park, Lost Island 2, and development, including office, manufacturing, and commercial space.

The presenter said the proposed development provides for indoor and outdoor recreation activities not already in town. The commissioners said the developer bears the cost of needed public improvements and needed water conservation efforts to be put in place. Regarding land use and development in a residential area, clarification is needed for Santa Fe Trail alignment and prairie dog preservation. The commissioners questioned the PUD changes before the final plat vote and issues regarding the Connexus 14-acre property and zoning PUD issues for an outdoor recreation facility.

Zoning hearing for new development with miniature golf courses

The amusement park presenter detailed the site plan for the project, including shared access drives and parking, while the commissioners directed the applicant to provide safe and reasonable road improvements and that lighting for miniature golf courses and the architecture and design conform to open space and provide ample open space for circulation and recreation. The proposed amusement park could affect changes to the Santa Fe Trail and intersections, the neighboring properties, and privacy features.

Discussions ensued regarding clarity on the impact of new development on the small town of Monument, and the compatibility of a proposed recreation center with the natural surroundings of the area. The discussions examined traffic safety and the highway completion before businesses open, and related concerns about coordination of development and access for the existing community, overall traffic safety on Beacon Lite Road, and reviewed roundabout design factors. This discussion included concerns about the four-way stop at Old Denver Road and Second Street for temporary and long-term improvements.

A motion was made to recommend the Conexus/Lost Island 2 project for development, and it passed 6-0.

**********

The Monument Planning Commission meets next at 6 p.m. Wednesday, June 12, at the Monument Town Hall Board Room, 645 Beacon Lite Rd., Monument, and usually meets the second Wednesday of each month. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit https://townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. Info: 719-884-8028. https://townofmonument.org.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Lost Island amusement park vicinity map and site plan. Maps courtesy of the Town of Monument.
Willow Springs Ranch site plan. Map courtesy of the Town of Monument.

Other Monument articles

Monument Town Council, May 6 and 20 – Disappointment expressed over alleged attorney misconduct and moratorium developments

By Chris Jeub

Two Monument Town Council meetings and a press conference held by Mayor Mitch LaKind brought pressing issues to light. LaKind addressed the public regarding ongoing attorney misconduct allegations, providing an update ahead of the investigation’s conclusion. The council meetings were marked by frustrations over an extended moratorium on new land development applications, with both council members and the public voicing concerns. The council also made several proclamations to honor community contributions, discussed updates on local development projects, and announced an extended route for the Fourth of July parade, promising an enhanced celebration for all attendees.

Press conference on attorney misconduct allegations

LaKind held a press conference on May 15 to address developments in an ongoing investigation by the Colorado Office of Attorney Regulation (OARC). The investigation stems from a complaint filed by the Town of Monument against attorney Grant Vander Jagt of the law firm Starzynski Vander Jagt in January 2023.

LaKind outlined that over the past 17 months, the OARC, part of the Colorado Supreme Court responsible for regulating the legal profession, has been investigating allegations against attorneys from Starzynski Vander Jagt. LaKind provided context for the investigation, explaining that in December 2022, some outgoing Board of Trustees members engaged Starzynski Vander Jagt to re-evaluate a campaign finance violation complaint. LaKind explained the initial complaint had been properly cured according to the Fair Campaign Practices Act and the municipal code. However, LaKind claimed the subsequent investigation by Starzynski Vander Jagt exceeded its authorized scope.

In April 2023, incoming Town Council members endorsed a different report based on a separate investigation. They are now exploring ways to retrieve the town’s client file and contest billings for services rendered by Starzynski Vander Jagt. The town has refrained from public comment to maintain the impartiality of the OARC investigation.

Addressing inquiries about an August 2023 IEC complaint lodged against him by departing council members, LaKind described it as “retaliatory.” He claimed that the IEC complaint was “filled with unsubstantiated and inaccurate assertions.” In contrast, LaKind claimed the OARC complaint was supported by substantive evidence.

When asked why LaKind was holding the press conference before the completion of the investigation, LaKind said that the delay in the investigation resulted from Grant Vander Jagt changing attorneys. LaKind defended the town’s decision to file the complaint, action that has cost the town over $100,000, highlighting the attorney’s alleged breaches and the necessity of protecting the town’s interests.

Moratorium update exposes frustrations

Town Manager Mike Foreman presented an update on the temporary suspension of new applications under the Land Development Code, which sparked noticeable frustration among both the council members and the public. The moratorium is set up to run through July 15 to allow time for filling staff positions and handling the backlog of applications.

LaKind questioned the progress, specifically inquiring about the posting for the Planner II position and why multiple positions couldn’t be posted simultaneously. He emphasized that the moratorium has been in place since February and saw no justification for further delays in posting these critical positions. Councilmember Jim Romanello also questioned the progress, warning Foreman that any request to extend the moratorium beyond July 15 would not be supported by him. Public sentiment mirrored the council’s frustration, with developer Tom Blunk expressing disappointment. Blunk highlighted the significant financial impacts of the continued moratorium, stressing that developers have been patiently waiting and urging the council to allow some submissions. He underscored the urgency by stating, “Time kills all deals.”

Foreman acknowledged the backlog, noting that numerous applications are pending and a surge in submissions is expected once the moratorium lifts. But LaKind requested a list of pending projects, pointing out that out of the 30 projects pending at the start of the moratorium, only 10 having been completed. Foreman said developers’ lack of response, not the staff’s actions, contributed to the delays. He also stressed the importance of hiring the right personnel. Foreman stated he would follow the council’s direction.

May proclamations

Several important proclamations were made to honor and recognize various groups and their contributions to the community. LaKind declared the week as Small Business Week, emphasizing the vital role that small businesses play in fostering local economic growth and community development. Foreman proclaimed May as National Cities, Towns, and Villages Month, highlighting the importance of municipalities in providing essential services and maintaining a high quality of life for residents. Foreman also proclaimed Professional Municipal Clerks Week, celebrating the dedication and professionalism of municipal clerks who ensure the smooth functioning of local government operations. Police Chief Patrick Regan declared National Police Week, paying tribute to the bravery and service of law enforcement officers who protect and serve the community, ensuring safety and security for all residents.

Monument Lake Beachfront

Lauren Richardson from Baseline Engineering presented a proposal for the final plat of Monument Lake Beachfront Filing No. 1. The purpose of the plat was to combine several lots and allow for parking permits. Despite a 7-0 recommendation from the Planning Commission and staff confirming the proposal met all review criteria, a question arose from Mayor Pro Tem Steve King regarding the status of Lake Mountain Lane being listed as a private road. This issue remained unresolved during the May 6 meeting. LaKind emphasized that the goal was to combine multiple lots, though the ownership of the road was still unclear. Town staff clarified that while the northern road is private, the town owns the access road. The final plat drawing mistakenly showed the road as private, prompting Romanello to move to defer the decision to the May 20 meeting, which passed unanimously.

Falcon Commerce Center

In another hearing, Richardson presented a final plat for Falcon Commerce Center Filing No. 3, located south of Baptist Road and west of I-25, covering 2.65 acres. The applicant, Kiowa Engineering Corp., received conditional approval pending reviews from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Staff approved the final plat, and an NES presentation highlighted that the final plat for Filing 2 was approved in October 2022, with plans to extend Terrazzo Drive to improve the south side of Jackson Creek. Concerns were raised by King about the project’s drainage potentially affecting the U.S. Air Force Academy (USAFA). NES acknowledged some confusion but assured that downstream impacts would be reported, noting the need for a detention pond on the south side, though not immediately for this project. The motion to approve this resolution passed unanimously.

Fourth of July parade extension

President and CEO of the Tri-Lakes Chamber of Commerce Terri Hayes announced an update regarding the Fourth of July parade. This year, the parade route has been extended significantly. Instead of its usual starting point near St. Peter Catholic Church, the parade will now commence at Santa Fe and Old Denver Road. This extension adds a considerable length to the route (about three blocks), promising a more extensive and engaging experience for both participants and spectators.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, June 3 and June 17. Call 719-884-8014 or see https://townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument articles

Monument Town Council, April 1 and 15 – Redistricting, property purchase, Higby Road development, and Pinball Pub

By Chris Jeub

Monument’s Town Council met in April to consider redistricting ordinances addressing population disparities, a real estate acquisition aiming to expand development opportunities, and Higby Road’s development. The approval of a new lodging and entertainment liquor license for Colorado Pinball Pub promises to add a unique entertainment option to the community.

Redistricting ordinance passes unanimously

Presented by Town Attorney Bob Cole, Ordinance No. 09-2024 focused on the adjustment of residential district boundaries and the incorporation of Section 1.12.050 into the Monument Municipal Code. GIS Technician Connie Driedger delivered a comprehensive presentation explaining the redistricting process showing adherence to legal statutes and principles of equitable representation, including factors such as equal representation, racial equity, and community preservation. The methodology, rooted in population estimates derived from 2020 census data and the recent history of building permits, highlighted the substantial population growth from 2020 to 2024, prompting the imperative for redistricting to rectify ensuing disparities. Community feedback echoed the sentiment of thoroughness, with Home Rule Charter Committee member Brandi Turner lauding the achieved balance in district populations.

Mayor Pro Tem Steve King and Mayor Mitch LaKind lauded the efforts of Driedger and the committee, branding the outcome as a “slam-dunk” during the council’s response segment. No objections or concerns arose from council members. The ordinance passed 7-0.

Gold Canyon Road property purchase

Town Council deliberated on Ordinance No. 10-2024, which focused on authorizing the purchase of real property at 980 and 992 Gold Canyon Road. Presented by Cole, the proposed acquisition aimed to provide the town with additional opportunities for development. The terms of the purchase were outlined, indicating the vacant property would cost $875,000.

During the discussion, Councilmember Laura Kronick raised concerns regarding the necessity of additional surveying, which Cole recommended, emphasizing risk reduction. Councilmember Jim Romanello inquired about the intended use of the property, prompting Town Manager Mike Foreman to clarify that its utilization would be subject to the council’s decision, potentially adding to the town’s property holdings. Councilmember Steve King sought clarification on the proposed uses for the property, while Councilmember Marco Fiorito queried the potential consequences of not proceeding with the purchase, to which Foreman highlighted the absence of risks to the town but acknowledged the availability of alternative buyers.

In the public comment session, a resident of Village Center Woodmoor expressed support for the town’s acquisition, citing longstanding discussions and safety concerns regarding traffic access from Highway 105. Conversely, another resident voiced apprehension about increased traffic and potential adverse impacts on residential neighborhoods and property values. Despite these concerns, the ordinance passed unanimously with a 7-0 vote. Romanello additionally commented on the Village Center Metro Board’s financial situation, attributing it to the board’s reluctance to accept the property as commercial.

Higby Road

A lengthy discussion unfolded regarding the classification of Higby Road, a crucial thoroughfare in Monument. Foreman initiated the discussion, highlighting the significance of the right-of-way for Higby Road and its design requirements as a key staff concern.

General manager of Triview Metropolitan District James McGrady provided historical context, explaining the six-year endeavor to include Higby Road into Monument’s jurisdiction. He emphasized efforts dating back to June 2021 when an annexation agreement allocated $2 million for road design. Shawn Hayes, a roadway design engineer, detailed plans for Higby Road, including features like sidewalks, bike lanes, and modifications to improve safety.

Concerns were raised by council members about discrepancies between the proposed development plans and the town’s ordinances regarding the right-of-way width. Despite assertions from developers that road widths would not change, tensions arose regarding adherence to planning documents versus engineering considerations. The debate oscillated between the need for flexibility in development plans and the importance of upholding established ordinances.

Councilmembers sought clarity on the necessity of further amendments to development plans and the town’s role in providing direction for the project. While there was consensus on maintaining a 100-foot right-of-way within town limits, ongoing discussions underscored the need for clear guidance and resolution to move forward with the road project effectively.

Pinball Pub license approved

The council addressed an application for a new lodging and entertainment liquor license by Colorado Pinball Monument LLC, operating as Colorado Pinball Pub at 303 Highway 105 Ste. B. The application received unanimous approval from the Town Council. Owner Dan Nikolich took questions from King about the nature of Pinball Monument. Nikolich clarified that the pub offers a combination of pinball and arcade games, along with a selection of drinks and food items. The establishment’s website highlights its offerings, including a variety of whiskeys, handcrafted cocktails, and classic arcade entertainment. The motion for approval passed with a vote of 7-0.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, May 6 and 20. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument articles

Monument Planning Commission, April 10 – Development processes discussed

By Janet Sellers

At the April 10 Monument Planning Commission meeting, the development process was discussed with a focus on providing more information upfront, streamlining the submittal process, clarifying the Planning Commission’s role, advocating for providing detailed information to address concerns, and providing individual submittals each time a new version is received. The group also brought up the issue of litigation and the lawyer’s role, while emphasizing the importance of having a final, unique project to discuss.

Speakers shared their previous experiences with the process, emphasizing the importance of reaching a consensus and expressing concerns about the cost of an attorney, while questioning the consistency of the Town Council in providing information to the public.

Development projects, Planning Commission roles

Speakers addressed concerns about providing too much information and suggested a more streamlined submittal process, while some questions revolved around the Planning Commission’s ability to comment on development projects, specifically regarding compliance with comprehensive plans and zoning regulations. Some explained that the commission can’t undo previous decisions but can provide input on individual projects through the preliminary and final PUD process.

Development process in a town

Speakers express frustration with the development process, feeling disoriented by multiple applications and lack of consolidation and that staff and developers should work together to consolidate projects and allow for a more efficient review process. A suggestion was made that negotiations with developers should be done at town level, not by staff, since staff can make administrative decisions, but big decisions should be made by the town body.

Planning changes and development in a community

The commission advocated for a thorough review of a comprehensive plan before zoning changes, emphasizing the importance of recording comments about roadway concerns for future reference.

The board discussed the importance of record-keeping for public representatives, mentioning the need to protect constituents by keeping a clear record of past decisions and emphasizing the value of open forums for constituents to research and understand past decisions, particularly when controversial items come up in the future. Since the board expressed frustration with inconsistent availability of an attorney during meetings, the town manager approved a request for legal counsel.

**********

Monument Planning Commission meeting are usually held on the second Wednesday of each month. The next meeting will be held Wednesday, May 8 at 6 pm at Town Hall Board Room, 645 Beacon Lite Rd., Monument. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. For information call 719-884-8028 or visit www.townofmonument.org.

Janet Sellers can be reached at JanetSellers@ocn.me.

Other Monument articles

Monument Town Council, March 4 and 18 – Council reviews redistricting, infrastructure, and parks

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council covered various topics in March, including discussions on Monument redistricting, infrastructure development along Jackson Creek Parkway, and Higby Road’s classification. The council approved a daytime park at Falcon Commerce Center and addressed water delivery costs and the ongoing debate between the Loop Renewable Water Project and the Northern Delivery System (NDS). Updates were provided on the building moratorium and an inquiry into raising traffic impact fees.

Monument redistricting

Discussions revolved around the presentation of findings and options regarding residential district boundaries by the council’s District Advisory Commission. Points included the existence of two residential districts and the necessity to enact changes 180 days before the upcoming election, as outlined in Ordinance No. 25-2023. Emphasizing principles such as one-person-one-vote, racial equality, compactness, contiguity, and preservation of communities of interest, the commission examined census data revealing a population imbalance between District 1 and District 2 in Monument, prompting a proposed redistricting plan.

With District 1 currently housing 4,648 people (56%) and District 2 accommodating 5,891 people (44%), projections indicate a significant population increase to 14,100 by November 2024. The suggested redistricting adjustments aim to balance population distribution, with District 1 proposed at 7,236 and District 2 at 7,131, representing a remarkably close 0.7% difference. Town Attorney Bob Cole noted the rarity of achieving such proximity in redistricting projects.

Jackson Creek Parkway

Jeremiah Reichert from Public Works led a discussion on the construction timelines for Highway 105 and Jackson Creek Parkway. He explained the complex mix of stakeholders including Classic Homes, the Town of Monument, El Paso County, and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). Reichert emphasized the necessity of infrastructure improvement along the corridor, highlighting the shared burden among the involved parties. Concerns were raised about future maintenance, particularly regarding the widening of Highway 105 encroaching into CDOT’s right-of-way, prompting worries about the town’s capacity to manage such responsibilities. Mayor Mitch LaKind pondered the potential scenario of CDOT shifting maintenance costs to the town. Classic Homes contributed to the discussion by addressing the complexity of the project, including the presence of utilities in the area, and projected an additional eight months for the completion of the development.

Higby Road

Reichert also presented a Higby Road report. It was concluded from an engineering study that Higby qualifies as a major collector street, necessitating additional buildouts. However, discussions ensued regarding the width of Higby, with LaKind expressing concerns about its capacity given the numerous proposed developments in the area. Reichert clarified that the report focused on engineering aspects rather than development specifics, emphasizing comparisons with other thoroughfares like Baptist Road and Highway 105. Councilmember Steve King expressed concerns about potential hazards near the high school and the ongoing debate about right-of-way concessions. Despite differing opinions on challenging county decisions and the costs involved, it was acknowledged that Higby’s classification as a major collector street had been confirmed. Plans were outlined to further refine decisions regarding Higby Road’s future by the end of 2024.

Daytime park approved

Ordinance No. 06-2024, concerning the approval of a final Planned Unit Development for Falcon Commerce Center Phase 2 Park, passed unanimously. Situated near South Baptist Road and I-25, staff confirmed that all criteria were met, with previous zoning and sketch plan approvals in 2022. The park, spanning 1.911 acres and intended for daytime use, aims to connect with the current Santa Fe Trail. Concerns were raised by Councilmember Kenneth Kimple regarding potential issues with traffic, lighting, and transient individuals utilizing the park for overnight stays. King, however, expressed support for the project, highlighting the value of allocating land for park use rather than industrial purposes, earning his endorsement with “two thumbs up.”

Monument water

Earlier in the year, the council requested Public Utilities Director Thomas Tharnish to present on the cost of water delivery to Monument customers, a request made following council concerns between the Loop and the NDS. Key figures were discussed, including the cost of water delivery at $10.49 per 1,000 gallons and the prevalence of three-fourths-inch-size meters supplying 90% of residential water services. Tharnish emphasized that there are additional costs to consider beyond the base delivery cost.

LaKind raised concerns about divergent cost figures between the Loop and NDS, prompting discussions about the longstanding debate between the two entities. Councilmembers expressed interest in resolving this issue and potentially aligning with one of the entities, with Councilmember Marco Fiorito highlighting the historical connection between NDS and the town. Councilmember Jim Romanello, however, urged the entire council to invite representatives from both the Loop and NDS for fair representation, a suggestion met with general agreement from all present.

After public comment, the discussion on water continued, with Kimple advocating for a timely decision due to upcoming decisions later. LaKind sought an update soon, with Town Manager Mike Foreman suggesting a meeting in the second half of May with representatives from the Loop, NDS, and Triview present. King expressed skepticism about the data provided by the Loop, while Councilmember Kronick emphasized the importance of making the right decision rather than feeling pressured.

Moratorium update

During public comment, concerns were raised regarding the building moratorium, with neighboring resident David Brewer expressing his desire for assistance from the Town Council in pursuing his American Dream of subdividing his 1,200-square-foot field. Brewer questioned the duration of the moratorium, as his request should necessitate only a short amount of the town’s time. Foreman provided an update on the moratorium, stating that the town currently has under 20 active cases and has identified a candidate for the planning director position, with background checks underway. Foreman anticipated providing a further update in mid-April regarding when the moratorium might be lifted.

Traffic impact fees

Councilmember King highlighted the disparity between Monument’s traffic impact fees, set at $700 per dwelling unit, and those of other communities, which can reach several thousand dollars. King emphasized the principle that development should bear its own costs, particularly considering the current state of road infrastructure lagging the needs of Monument’s residents. Foreman noted that the staff is assessing these fees and preparing a report to present to the council. LaKind expressed a desire to address this issue before the moratorium is lifted, indicating a sense of urgency in resolving the matter.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, April 1 and April 15. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, Feb. 5 and 20 – Monument discusses Loop water system, non-sanctuary status, traffic studies

By Chris Jeub

Two town hall meetings were held on Feb. 5 and 20, during which updates and discussions were provided on a range of topics. The meetings covered progress reports on various projects and initiatives, including water management, infrastructure development, sales tax solutions, and immigration policies. Tensions arose during discussions on traffic concerning development impacts of Highway 105 and Jackson Creek Parkway. No decisions were made during these meetings concerning the congestion of traffic in this area.

Progress report on the Loop water system

John Kuosman, representing the El Paso County Regional Loop Water Authority (EPCRLWA, or the Loop) provided an update on the ambitious Loop water system during the Feb. 5 meeting. The system, a rotational water distribution initiative spanning the Colorado Springs area with Monument situated at its northernmost point, aims to transform water management practices in the region.

Kuosman expressed optimism about the project’s progress, noting that while significant headway had been made, the journey to completion was ongoing. A pivotal moment came in October 2023 when an operational model was successfully executed, with the results shared among all member agencies. Central to Kuosman’s presentation was the system’s value proposition, emphasizing the long-term benefits of infrastructure investments. Forecasts suggested that the system could deliver water at a rate as low as $8.35 per 1,000 gallons, positioning it as a cost-effective solution for member agencies. Monument, represented in the system’s governance structure, holds a proportionate share of decision-making authority, ensuring local involvement in critical matters.

Councilmembers posed pertinent questions regarding cost comparisons, potential additions to existing fees, and the timeline for construction. Concerns were raised about the transparency of cost projections and the feasibility of delivering renewable water to all stakeholders. Kuosman addressed these queries, acknowledging the need for further analysis while affirming the system’s capability to provide renewable water upon completion.

In response to inquiries about construction timelines, Kuosman outlined a timeline aiming for the $110 million system to be operational by 2027, demonstrating a tangible pathway toward realizing the project’s goals.

Baseline Engineering steps in during moratorium

Amid Monument’s moratorium on new project submissions, Baseline Engineering has assumed a pivotal role in project management. Two contracted planners, Julie Esterl and Lauren Richardson, have been brought on board to bolster the town’s capabilities. Town Manager Mike Foreman highlighted the substantial workload, revealing that Baseline Engineering is currently managing 20 projects. Foreman also expressed optimism about the imminent hiring of a town planner, with strong candidates “already in the pipeline.”

Hybrid sales tax solution approved

Resolution No. 06-2024 was presented and unanimously approved by the Town Council on Feb. 5. Finance Director Mona Hirjoi proposed the resolution, which outlines a hybrid solution for the self-collection of sales tax in Monument, set to commence on Oct. 1, 2024. Stemming from the council’s acknowledgment of the need for improved control over revenue processes following Monument’s transition to a home-rule municipality in January 2023, the decision to pursue this hybrid solution aims to enhance autonomy and efficiency. Hirjoi played a role in preparing and proposing the solution, facilitating discussions with key stakeholders such as the Colorado Department of Revenue and consulting firm CoSak to inform the decision-making process.

Monument Lake and Limbach Park improvements

The Monument Town Council passed Resolution No. 07-2024 unanimously, approving a contract with CXT for the construction of a restroom facility at Monument Lake. This resolution marks a significant improvement over the current portable bathrooms, addressing a need for better amenities at the lake. Notably, the project is made financially feasible through the awarding of a grant that covers most of the $183,000 budget.

The Town Council also unanimously approved Resolution No. 08-2024, greenlighting a contract with Star Playgrounds for the installation of new equipment at Limbach Park. With $200,000 allocated to the Parks Department for improvements, staff identified Limbach Park as the optimal location to allocate these funds. Foreman added the importance of meeting Americans with Disabilities Act requirements, highlighting Limbach Park as a priority area for improvement.

Ballot measures discussed

Two ballot measures were discussed as possibly being added to November’s ballot. Ballot Measure 1 proposes a lodging tax, with Mayor Mitch LaKind advocating for a 2-2.5% tax rate on short-term rentals, specifically targeting residential stays under 29 days as well as overnight stays at truck stops. The proposed tax revenue would be allocated exclusively to parks and trails, with LaKind emphasizing its potential as a consistent funding mechanism. While councilmembers like Steve King expressed a preference for keeping all funds within parks, others, including Sana Abbott and Jim Romanello, raised questions about diversifying funding or forming a parks commission for fund distribution.

Concurrently, Ballot Measure 2 focuses on charter changes, with Romanello proposing to lower the age limit for commissioners to 18, sparking debate among councilmembers about the potential impacts of altering the charter. While some, like Councilmember Marco Fiorito, expressed openness to additional ballot measures, others, like Councilmember Laura Kronick, voiced concerns about the piecemeal alteration of the charter, emphasizing the importance of respecting previous votes. These discussions underscored the complexities surrounding both ballot measures, highlighting the need for thorough consideration and public education before they go to a vote.

Monument resolves as non-sanctuary town

The Town Council passed Resolution No. 11-2024, spearheaded by Mayor LaKind, declaring Monument as a “non-sanctuary” town. The resolution ignited a debate on the town’s preparedness for handling migrant arrivals. Town Attorney Bob Cole emphasized the resolution’s intent, positioning Monument in contrast to sanctuary cities, while Councilmember Kenneth Kimple sought clarification on the town’s plan in the event of migrant arrivals. King expressed reservations about the town’s capacity for accommodating migrants, citing limited resources for public housing. LaKind underscored the town’s alignment with neighboring jurisdictions like Colorado Springs and El Paso County in their approach to migrant response. Ultimately, the resolution passed unanimously with a 7-0 vote, solidifying Monument’s stance on the issue amid ongoing debates at the state and national levels.

Town greenlights new wellhouses

The council passed Resolution No. 12-2024, approving $2.19 million for a construction project to build three new wellhouses in support of Wells 11, 12, and 13 for the Public Works Department. The resolution, presented by Director of Public Works Thomas Tharnish, sparked a lively discussion among council members regarding the project’s cost and potential budgetary concerns. Tharnish addressed previous pricing issues that had since been resolved, but King remarked on the current inflationary environment. He noted that costs for projects have risen significantly, making it prudent to move forward without delay to avoid further expense escalation through rebidding. LaKind expressed apprehension about potential budget overruns, citing previous instances with the water tank project. Romanello emphasized the importance of cost containment measures to prevent excessive spending. Despite concerns, the motion ultimately passed unanimously.

Maverik development debated

Tensions escalated among councilmembers, notably between Romanello and Kimple, shedding light on underlying disagreements over the town’s hesitation to allow Maverik Monument Junction Lot 1 Monument Junction West Filing No. 1 to continue.

During the Feb. 5 meeting, Kimple voiced objections to Ordinance No. 24-2023, which pertained to the approval of a Planned Unit Development for Maverik Monument Junction. Kimple requested its removal from the agenda, highlighting discrepancies in the ordinance’s language that implied council approval where none had been given. However, despite Kimple’s objections, the council proceeded with discussions, with the town staff emphasizing that the application was merely on hold, not withdrawn.

During the Feb. 20 meeting, a pivotal point of contention arose during the discussion on the Traffic Impact Study, a study called for by Kimple himself. A representative from Jacobs Engineering presented the study, largely answering questions Kimple raised via email. Kimple continued to raise concerns regarding the accuracy of traffic data presented in the study, alleging skewed numbers due to data collection outside of school times and the omission of COVID-19 impacts. Despite explanations from Jacobs Engineering, Kimple persisted in questioning the validity of the report, expressing apprehensions about the potential hazards posed by increased development on the community.

Romanello engaged in a pointed exchange with Kimple, challenging the validity of Kimple’s claims and highlighting the inevitability of traffic growth given Colorado Springs’ northward expansion. Romanello emphasized the importance of smart development rather than outright opposition, echoing sentiments shared by other councilmembers regarding the need for cautious, informed decision-making.

However, Kimple persisted in bringing in external information, prompting Mayor LaKind to question its validity, particularly highlighting Kimple’s assertion that Highway 105 wouldn’t be completed until 2040. “They’re actively building four lanes right outside my bedroom window right now; I hear it all day long,” LaKind said. Romanello followed by saying “I’m not OK with this at all,” referring to Kimple’s call for a tax-funded study to help promote a “NIMBY attitude” (Not In My Backyard).

Town Attorney Bob Cole emphasized that no conclusion should be made because the applicant (Maverik) was not present. If Maverik should return with its application, Kimple said he would likely have more questions.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, March 4 and March 18. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, Jan. 2 and 16 – “It’s hard to do business here,” developers claim before moratorium approval

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council (MTC) convened for its first meeting of the year on Jan. 2, addressing various topics including the ArtSites Program, new ordinances, a major Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment, and property tax mill levy scenarios. The second meeting commenced on Jan. 16 with a contentious debate with developers over a proposed moratorium on new applications for development, a moratorium that passed unanimously.

ArtSites program presentation

Madeline VanDenHoek from the ArtSites Committee presented an update on the town’s ArtSites program. The program, managed by Parks and Trails Planner and Program Manager Cassie Olgren, currently boasts 25 sites with 14 rotating sculptures, six permanent sculptures, and five murals. VanDenHoek highlighted the program’s growth in 2023, with an increased budget of $19,760 for 2024. The town aims to expand the program further and is seeking additional committees to contribute to its development.

Residents can explore the ArtSites using the Otocast app. More information can be found on the town’s website at www.townofmonument.org/582/ArtSites.

Ordinance approval and Council District Advisory Commission

The council discussed and approved two ordinances during the meeting. Ordinance No. 25-2023 established the Council District Advisory Commission, while Ordinance No. 01-2024 adopted Chapter 2.60 of the Monument Municipal Code regarding standards of conduct. Mayor Pro Tem Steve King commended the level of detail in the latter ordinance, emphasizing its importance. Mayor Mitch LaKind thanked Councilmember Laura Kronick for spearheading the project. The ordinances passed unanimously, with LaKind expressing relief at fulfilling requirements from the Home Rule Charter.

Willow Springs Ranch PUD Amendment

A significant portion of the Jan. 2 meeting was dedicated to discussing Ordinance No. 03-2024, which approved a major PUD amendment for the Willow Springs Ranch Preliminary/Final PUD Site Plan. Blane Perkins, representing the applicant, explained that adjustments were made to eight lots to accommodate a Mountain View Electric Association (MVEA) easement. This led to a reduction in lot sizes below the R4 minimum of 5,000 square feet.

Councilmembers raised questions about the process, the nature of the error, and the potential for alternative solutions. During the discussion, Councilmember Jim Romanello characterized the issue as a simple mistake, while LaKind likened it to housekeeping. Councilmember Kenneth Kimple, however, inquired if there had been any consideration given to removing the houses in question. Despite the various considerations, the ordinance ultimately passed unanimously, with a consensus that the adjustment was deemed necessary for utilities and access easements.

Property tax mill levy resolution

Director of Finance Mona Hirjoi presented Resolution No. 75-2023, seeking authorization for the certification of the property tax mill levy to the El Paso County Assessor for the 2024 budget year. The council discussed various scenarios for the mill levy, with LaKind expressing a desire to lower it. Legal counsel cautioned against decreasing it too much, as subsequent increases might require voter approval. The council settled on a reduction to 5.0, with Romanello preferring 5.0 and Kimple suggesting 5.25. The resolution passed unanimously.

Zeal at Jackson Creek Final Plat discussion

The meeting concluded with a discussion of Resolution No. 04-2024, approving the final plat for Zeal at Jackson Creek. Concerns were raised about rights of way and setbacks, prompting a motion by Romanello to continue the discussion to February. Councilmembers emphasized the need to ensure proper road classification for Higby and maintain control over town-owned land.

LaKind urged thorough consideration of the road’s design, with Councilmember Steve King emphasizing compliance with town code. The resolution was tabled until February, with a unanimous vote to continue the discussion.

Moratorium divides Monument Town Council and developers

In a highly charged meeting on Dec. 16, 2023, tensions flared between the MTC and developers as they clashed over Ordinance No. 04-2024, proposing a temporary suspension of new applications under the Town of Monument Land Development Code. The ordinance, presented by MTC lawyer Bob Cole, sought a moratorium lasting until the July 15 meeting to allow the staff to restructure and hire a new planning director.

Town Manager Mike Foreman, advocating for the moratorium, underscored the increasing number of errors made in handling development cases. He emphasized the urgency of hiring a consultant to review and adjust procedures, hire a new director, and tackle the backlog of 25-30 cases that required immediate attention. LaKind expressed concern over the frequent turnover of planning directors and proposed an independent investigation to uncover the root causes.

The development community, particularly Classic Homes, expressed frustration over the moratorium. One representative criticized the town, stating, “You guys are rough on [developers].” The sentiment was that the town officials, acting as judge and jury, were playing politics and had personal agendas, making the process challenging. In response to LaKind’s suggestion that developers should not expect the town to come in blind, Classic Homes argued that written statements of opinion should not be formed before all the facts are presented.

The planning director for a Home Builders Association expressed concern over the negative message conveyed by imposing a moratorium on new developments, stating, “It’s hard to do business here.” This sentiment reflected a broader sentiment among developers who found the current environment in Monument less favorable for conducting business compared to other locations along the Front Range.

A notable exchange occurred between Foreman and Classic Homes CEO Doug Stimple. Stimple voiced strong concerns, arguing that the moratorium would jeopardize ongoing projects and lead to substantial financial losses. Foreman, in response, clarified the need for a strategic pause to rectify past mistakes and improve the town’s development processes. “I got jumped on,” Foreman claimed. Stimple responded, “If you had $20 million invested in the project, you’d like clarification, too.”

Despite attempts to address developers’ concerns, the council voted 7-0 in favor of the moratorium.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meetings are scheduled for Monday, Feb. 5 and 19. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, Dec. 6 – Town Council debates sales tax options, Loop Water Authority, Maverik gas station

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council (MTC) meeting in December covered topics such as potential self-collection of sales tax, Loop Water Authority Project participation, and budget resolutions. The meeting underscored practical decision-making for the town’s financial and developmental future.

Sales tax management options unveiled

During the presentation on sales tax future state options by Sophia Hassman, the MTC delved into the complexities of transitioning to a self-collected sales tax model under Home Rule. Hassman highlighted the benefits of increased oversight, quicker turnaround, and enhanced tax compliance, with the potential for additional revenue streams. Councilmember Marco Fiorito sought clarification on certifications needed for in-house management, to which the response emphasized that a CPA is not necessary, and the first year would require two trained employees. The discussion also included cost considerations, with the hybrid option emerging as the most economical at $228,798, compared to $344,840 and $457,710 for an in-house or contractual option.

Councilmember Laura Kronick asked about the timeline for fund receipts in comparison to the state and was assured that under the proposed self-collect model, funds would be received within two days, as opposed to the state’s two-month holding period. Mayor Mitch LaKind and Councilmember Steve King inquired about the potential revenue increase with self-collection, to which the response ranged from 8% to 15%, with a break-even point slightly over 2%. Amid these discussions, King sought the opinion of Mona Hirjoi, director of Finance, who expressed torn sentiments, citing increased workload challenges and the difficulty of retaining experienced personnel. Despite the uncertainties, King suggested the option of reverting to self-collection if the chosen approach proved untenable, a sentiment echoed by Town Manager Mike Foreman, who mentioned instances of other municipalities returning to the previous system.

Water Authority participation affirmed, for now

A detailed exchange during the discussion of Resolution No. 59-2023 aimed to affirm the town’s participation in the El Paso County Regional Loop Water Authority project. LaKind expressed a desire to extend the resolution indefinitely, prompting Councilmember Kenneth Kimple to seek clarification on the meaning of “participation.” Foreman clarified that the town had invested $250,000 in the project to continue with the design phase. Kimple, however, raised concerns about the lack of definitive answers regarding the project’s return on investment and advocated for a decisive move, stating, “It’s time to cut the string to ensure our water.”

As the dialogue progressed, tensions surfaced as Fiorito also expressed frustration, stating, “We’ve kicked this can down the road, and we’re going to continue drilling wells, [waiting for] a renewable water system.… I want this council to make a decision now.” Kronick echoed a sense of frustration, feeling as though the council was being “held hostage.” The discussion revealed a diversity of perspectives, with Fiorito advocating for a move toward the Northern Delivery System (NDS) for a renewable water solution, emphasizing its viability within eight months. The eventual vote resulted in a 6-1 approval, with Kimple voting “no,” reflecting the complexity and divergence of opinions within the council.

Budget resolutions and tax surplus

All budget resolutions passed unanimously, reporting a 19% tax revenue surplus. Councilmembers acknowledged the hard work of the town staff. Hirjoi and Foreman highlighted the 16.46% reserve and an additional 3% reserve in TABOR, totaling a 19.46% reserve.

Maverik Monument Junction back to Planning Commission

The discussion surrounding Ordinance No. 24-2023, addressing the approval of a planned unit development for Maverik Monument Junction, revealed a debate among MTC members. The proposed 1.5-acre commercial convenience store, slated to open in fall 2024, faced scrutiny over traffic implications and concern for too many gas stations in Monument. Mayor LaKind and Councilmember Kimple raised concerns about traffic inaccuracies and the impact on the town’s character, with Kimple expressing worry about emergency evacuation.

The debate escalated when the mayor questioned the absence of the traffic report in the Planning Commission’s documentation, leading to a temporary pause in the proceedings. Councilmember Jim Romanello defended the project, emphasizing the necessity of providing options for residents east of town and disputing claims that Maverik would cause excessive traffic.

Tensions flared when traffic engineer responses were challenged, with King expressing concerns about traffic complications. The debate culminated in the decision to send the motion back to the Planning Commission for further review, scheduled for February. The final vote reflected a split decision, with Kimple voting against the motion, asserting that it did not meet the criteria in the first place.

Land acquisition approved for Town Hall expansion

In Ordinance No. 26-2023, the council authorized the purchase of the Brower property. Foreman explained that the land would be used to expand the Town Hall and its parking facilities. The ordinance passed unanimously.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. With both of these Mondays being holidays (New Year’s Day and MLK Day), the next meetings are scheduled for Tuesday, Jan. 2, and Tuesday, Jan. 16. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council (MTC) articles

Monument Town Council, Nov. 6, 2023 – Supplementary budget items and signs ordinance discussed

By Chris Jeub

One regular meeting of the Monument Town Council took place in November, and the regularly scheduled second meeting was cancelled for the Thanksgiving holiday. Issues covered in the four-hour meeting included symbolic gestures and police force promotions, local government initiatives and financial insights, budget talks, and the town’s temporary sign ordinance.

Israel support and police advancement

Mayor Mitch LaKind steered discussions toward a motion to change the town’s lighting to blue and white throughout the second week of November, a gesture aimed at showing solidarity with the State of Israel. The proposal was approved by the rest of the councilmembers and direction given to Town Manager Mike Foreman.

Police Chief Patrick Regan brought positive news with the announcement of promotions and swearing-in of key personnel, including Christine DeRienzo and Joe Barraza to sergeant positions, along with the welcome of Chris Sullivan to the Police Department.

Local initiatives and financial insights

Lu Ann Pyatt presented a comprehensive overview titled “Meet the Local Government Team.” Key points included the provision of a free State Geographic Information System (GIS) system for tax understanding, the team’s role in ensuring the functionality of the sales tax system processing $209 million per month, and the educational focus behind the 139 audits conducted last year. Residents were directed to explore tax-related information on tax.colorado.gov.

Max Mojab from Piper Sandler provided insights into the Investment Portfolio of the Town of Monument. The 2023 performance review showed promise, with an estimated revenue of about $250,000. Mojab expressed confidence in a projected 2024 revenue of $500,000 from investments.

Budget talks

Director of Finance Mona Hirjoi presented the 2024 budget and 2023 amended budget, sparking some fervent discussions. Notable points of attention included Foreman’s proposal for a new line item for a PR contractor, resulting in a $30,000 reallocation from the supplemental budget. Mayor LaKind expressed surprise at the revelation of a $300,000 allocation for upgrades to the 259 Beacon Lite Building, leading to discussions about the availability of grants and the necessity for more comprehensive data in the budget presentation.

Employee concerns took the spotlight during the budget discussions, with some expressing the need for part-time jobs to make ends meet. Councilmember Steve King delved into the intricacies of the merit pay system, revealing that over 90% of employees receive merit pay. However, concerns about the budget’s transparency emerged, with Mayor LaKind expressing dissatisfaction and Councilmember Ken Kimple echoing the call for better data. LaKind and the rest of the council began calling the preliminary budget a “wish list” to where voting would take place in December.

Temporary signs controversy

A significant portion of the meeting ignited with a debate over the town’s temporary signs ordinance. King read a letter accusing Amy Stephens, wife of former Councilmember Ron Stephens, of initiating a lawsuit and condemning the new council for enforcing an ordinance that forbids signs on the town’s rights of way. LaKind emphasized that the town ordinance prohibits signs in rights of way, underlining the need for a politically neutral approach. LaKind also emphasized that the problem is particularly with political signs.

Community members voiced opinions, with diverse perspectives on private property sign regulations and concerns about freedom of speech. Mayor LaKind proposed a community workshop and a more extensive discussion in 2024 to address the temporary signs issue comprehensively, recognizing the urgency and complexity of finding a balanced solution that respects both individual expression and town aesthetics.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meeting is scheduled for Monday, Dec. 4, and Monday, Dec. 18. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, Nov. 8 – Maverick station approved

By Leslie Hanks

The first agenda item at the Nov. 8 meeting of the Monument Planning Commission was 3A and 3B, Maverick Junction, Lot 1, Monument Junction West, Filing 1—Preliminary/Final PUD Plan. The property at 1530 Laughing Lab Way is at the intersection of Highway 105 and Jackson Creek Parkway. The proposed final PUD ordinance approving 1.5 acres is for a Maverick, a convenience/fuel store.

Planning staffer Jeff Liljegren found that the proposal is generally consistent with the Monument Comprehensive Plan. Planning staff explained that the proposal was “more likely consistent than less likely consistent” with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM).

Community concerns continue to focus on views, strong small-town community identity, adequate open space, and noise deterrence.

Staff found the proposal is consistent with most of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.

Additionally, staff found two items consistent with Monument land use policies: transportation and economic opportunities.

The associated traffic study found 4,149 weekday trips anticipated. The proposed Maverick convenience store is expected to generate an average of 4,000 trips per weekday. This will be a Level of Service (LOS) of F or better (F is a low score) for peak drive time in afternoons. A traffic signal will be warranted at Jackson Creek and Fat Tire Drive due to the LOS—F rating.

Staff explained that Lot 1 (Maverick convenience store) and Lot 4 (Whataburger) were already approved. According to records, the Final Plat for Monument Junction West, Filing 1—the two lots—was recorded on May 19, 2022.

This hearing was originally scheduled for the September and October meetings, which were cancelled. Proper notice was given for all three Planning Commission hearings.

Applicant Kevin Dice has met all 13 criteria for preliminary PUD review and all nine for final review.

Dice, senior planning manager for Maverick, gave a presentation about Maverick’s history, including a merger with Flying J. In September, Maverick completed a purchase of Kum & Go, making the Maverick holdings a total of 800 stores; 400 Maverick stores and 400 Kum & Go. Dice explained that the store is a 24/7 operation which will carry beer, wine, and tobacco but no spirits. The store will have fresh food prepared daily, and restrooms will be open to the public. Although there is a high flow component to the business, which will accommodate trucks, it is not a truck stop.

Consultant Mark Horton, a civil engineer, gave a brief presentation on Jackson Creek/Highway 105 improvement plans. “We’re on phase 2 with the Colorado Department of Transportation, El Paso County and Monument [three jurisdictions] reviewing transportation needs and we’re hopeful we can get started [in the] next year to 18 months, which should greatly improve the intersection of Highway 105 and Jackson Creek Parkway.”

Commissioner Martin Trujillo called for public comments in attendance and online, and there were none.

Trujillo then asked for commissioners’ comments and questions.

The commissioners discussed the proximity of the new Maverick station to the Kum & Go on Highway105 only 700 feet away. Dice explained that they have many locations where they have stores across the street from each other. Concerns were raised again about truck traffic. The applicant explained that the only 18-wheeler traffic onsite should be for fuel deliveries.

The measure passed on a 6-0 vote. It will now be considered by the Monument Town Council.

ZEAL at Jackson Creek

The next proposal on the agenda was measure 3B “ZEAL at Jackson Creek” Preliminary/Final Plat application. The property is at Higby and Bowstring Roads, off Jackson Creek Parkway. The property is 20.1 acres, zoned PRD10 Residential attached.

Staff reported that the proposal was substantially in compliance with the FLUM. They clarified that it is “more likely than less likely” consistent.

“Triview Metro District’s proposed improvements to Higby Road and adequate turn lanes make this proposal more than 50% in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan,” staff noted. Zoning for this proposal was approved in March 2015. This property is part of Regency Park 6th Amended and rezoned Plan—PRD10 Planned Residential District, Multi-Family land use.

The traffic study indicates this proposal would generate 1,238 trips daily. A roundabout is planned for traffic control through 2048. The project was rated LOS-C or better.

Still in question is the matter of whether the Higby Road right of way (ROW) of 95 feet is enough. Further discussion ensued about whether Higby Road should be a major collector (90 feet) or be a minor arterial (120 feet).

Jim Doby of Doby Development Group presented the ZEAL for Living “From Living to Thriving” proposal. Jim McGrady, district manager for Triview Metro District, also gave input about transportation matters.

Commissioner Trujillo closed the hearing after no public responses were received. He asked for commissioners’ input.

There was quite a bit of discussion about the nature of the proposal being more rental space while the Monument community has made it quite clear that it prefers single-family residential to multi-family attached.

Also, there was much discussion about the transportation concerns over Higby Road and whether there will be enough ROW with this proposal. After much input from Vice Chair Danny Ours and Commissioner Kathy Green, there was consensus for a continuance to further explore the transportation issues and whether the proposal, as presented, would actually be what will be developed in the event the property would be sold after the Preliminary/Final Plat was granted.

Commissioner Ours asked, “Could this 20-acre parcel be combined with other acreage and do a totally different proposal?”

Commissioner Green raised the concern, “Is this whole thing about circumventing code for a narrower ROW?”

After much debate, there was a request for a continuance for more time to study maps, roadways, and ROWs to better understand long-term Higby Road needs.

Commissioner Ours asked staff whether the owner was advised about Monument not wanting more rental properties. A staff member replied, “That isn’t the role of staff to ask those questions or make those comments.”

At this point the applicant stated that he hoped the Planning Commission will be following the Fair Housing Act.

The Commissioners voted 6-1 (Commissioner Ray Egley dissenting) for a continuance and suggested that at future hearings they would appreciate having legal representation available to answer questions for which they might need legal advice.

**********

The Monument Planning usually meets on the second Wednesday of each month at 6 pm at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road.. The next meeting is scheduled for Dec. 13. To see the options for remote public participation in each meeting, visit www.townofmonument.org/263/Planning-Commission-Board-of-Adjustment. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Planning Commission. Info: 719-884-8028. www.townofmonument.org.

Leslie Hanks can be reached at lesliehanks@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Town Council, Oct. 2, 16, and 19 – Councilmembers scrutinize traffic report, proposed investments, park development, and resolution opposing Proposition HH

By Chris Jeub

Two regular meetings and one special meeting took care of many issues in Monument in October. These included water management, streetscape redesign, traffic safety, investment strategy, and community park development.

Monument traffic study

Councilmember Ken Kimple expressed his dissatisfaction with police Commander John Lupton’s traffic study, which Kimple had specifically requested. Lupton’s presentation provided insights into how the Police Department tracks traffic citations, accidents, and citizen complaints. He made it clear that the study aimed to provide objective data to enhance traffic safety. However, Kimple was not entirely satisfied and referred to it as “a good start.”

Kimple raised concerns during the presentation, emphasizing that he had asked for studies in areas where he had personal experiences, including near-miss incidents involving himself and his wife. He particularly highlighted issues near Jackson Creek Parkway, where he believed speeding cars were a major concern. He sought more comprehensive solutions to mitigate speeding and improve safety in these areas.

Commander Lupton responded by underlining his extensive 32 years of experience in conducting traffic studies. He explained that the Police Department’s role was to use data for objective decision-making and to respond with changes and enforcement measures. He also clarified that certain traffic issues, like the implementation of speed bumps, were under the jurisdiction of the Planning Department, not law enforcement. Despite Lupton’s explanations, Kimple continued to express doubts and the need for more comprehensive actions to address traffic problems in his neighborhood.

Wells Fargo investment strategy criticized

Rachel Brown from Wells Fargo addressed the Monument Town Council, shedding light on an investment strategy involving the money market fund specifically designed for government entities. This initiative aimed to allow the town to maximize the interest on funds held in its bank accounts, potentially boosting revenue. Brown explained that when the town’s daily balance exceeds its target amount, the excess funds are transferred into an omnibus account overnight and invested the following morning when the financial market opens. Conversely, if the balance falls below the target, provisional credit is extended to bring the town back to the desired level, and funds are redeemed the next morning when the market reopens.

Mayor Mitch LaKind asked for assurances regarding the protection of taxpayer money and expressed concerns about issues such as fraud and fines that had been imposed on the bank in recent years. Brian Scott, managing director for Wells Fargo, specializing in government clients, responded by acknowledging the bank’s troubled history, notably the fines imposed in 2016. He clarified that it had been a disappointing chapter in the bank’s history but reassured the council that the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) rating for the bank had returned to the highest rating of “outstanding” status by 2020. Despite Scott’s explanation, LaKind remained unsatisfied and pressed for further safeguards to protect the town’s money from any potential misconduct by bank employees.

Kimple inquired about Wells Fargo’s motivation for the initiative, to which Scott responded that they aimed to provide excellent service to the town as a client. Councilmember Jim Romanello countered the dissention by first referencing his financial advisor experience of over 30 years, then sharing insights about money markets, emphasizing the relatively low level of risk associated with them. He encouraged the town to take advantage of the current high interest rates.

Director of Finance Mona Hirjoi, who presented the initiative, suggested that monthly reports could be included to track the revenue generated by the fund. LaKind continued to express dissatisfaction in Wells Fargo, but the council still gave direction to the town staff to continue with the investment fund.

Heart of Monument Playpark

Resolution No. 64-2023 was discussed, which involved approving a contract with N.E.S. for the design and management of the Heart of Monument Playpark. The decision to select N.E.S. was reached after evaluation of proposals and presentations. It was clarified that the funding for this project primarily stemmed from fundraising efforts by the Kiwanis organization, which had successfully secured $35,000 of the estimated $47,000 required for the design phase, with the total cost of park construction estimated at $450,000.

Scott Ross, representing Kiwanis, shared insights into the fundraising sources, which included substantial contributions from both grants and local donations. However, during the discussion, Councilmember Steve King expressed doubts and questioned the financial aspects of the project. He sought clarification on who would be responsible for the costs and expressed difficulty in comprehending the $47,000 price tag for park design. Furthermore, King voiced concerns about N.E.S.’s past interactions with the community, claiming a “lack of compassion.”

Katy Frank, a project manager with N.E.S., responded by assuring the council that she has always approached projects with community interests in mind. King inquired about Frank’s role in the project, to which she confirmed her involvement as the lead. Councilmember Kimple raised a question about the park’s compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Frank affirmed that the park would indeed be ADA compliant.

Continuing to seek clarification, King questioned the scoring method for selecting N.E.S., and Madeline VanDenHoek explained that N.E.S. was chosen primarily due to their experience with fundraising, which was crucial for the project’s success. In the end, the motion to approve the contract with N.E.S. for the park’s design and management passed unanimously.

Water issues

Two presentations were given during the Oct. 2 meeting, both explaining Monument’s water resources and soliciting the town’s involvement. The first presentation was given by Jim McGrady, general manager for the Triview Metropolitan District, concerning the Northern Delivery System (NDS). The importance of storage was underscored as it provides the town with reserves in case of droughts. “If we don’t conserve and the aquifer drops, pretty soon you find yourself without access to water,” McGrady warned. His presentation ended with the request for Monument to tap into the Triview water district. “We need to know now” if Monument would like to work with Triview.

The second presentation was from John Guzman and Jessie Schaffer of the El Paso County Regional Loop Water Authority (EPCRLWA). Established in 2022, the EPCRLWA is seeking Monument’s participation, with a total project cost estimated to be $150 million to $200 million. The primary objective is to transition away from the Denver Basin as quickly as possible and adopt a “3 Rs” approach: reducing, repurposing, and reusing water sources.

Notable distinctions between the EPCRLWA and the NDS project were discussed, including EPCRLWA’s independence from third-party involvement and potential value-creation opportunities. During the discussion, Mayor LaKind expressed concern over the wide cost estimate range and urged the EPCRLWA to provide more accurate figures. In response, EPCRLWA representatives explained that the wide price range was meant to prevent misrepresentation. Schaffer insisted that the EPCRLWA is about six months out from having more accurate numbers. Amy Lathen, general manager for the EPCRLWA, concluded the presentation by emphasizing that numbers are difficult to put up right now, but the EPCRLWA allows for options to get off dependence from the Denver Basin. “Autonomy is one of the major goals [of the EPCRLWA],” she said.

After the lengthy discussion, Romanello motioned to move Resolution No. 59-2023: A Resolution Affirming Participation in the Loop Water Authority Project to the first meeting in December.

Streetscape design concepts

Michelle Lazarz, a student at the University of Colorado, presented redesign proposals for Historic Downtown Monument. The primary focus of her presentation was on wayfinding and streetscape design concepts, with the intention to enhance the area’s appeal and attract visitors from the nearby interstate.

A significant aspect of the project involved assessing the existing parking spaces in the area, which currently consisted of 66 parallel parking spaces. A survey with 350 respondents was conducted. The proposal included three parking alternatives designed to optimize parking capacity while preserving the historic charm of the downtown area. However, it was emphasized that these were preliminary design concepts that would require further in-depth surveys to ensure compliance with ADA standards and streetscape regulations. The estimated budget for these proposed upgrades and improvements was $2.2 million, encompassing enhancements to the streetscape, signage, and parking facilities.

Councilmembers posed questions and sought clarifications. Some of the key points of discussion included the consideration of roundabouts in the design, the potential increase in parking spaces with angle parking, and next steps in the project. The forthcoming stages of the project, including grant writing and planning, will be instrumental in bringing these innovative concepts to life for the benefit of Monument’s residents and visitors.

Resolution to oppose Proposition HH dies

Mayor LaKind presented Resolution No. 65-2023, which addressed the council’s position on Proposition HH, a state bill with potential ramifications for Monument residents’ taxes. The resolution explicitly conveyed the council’s opposition to Proposition HH and encouraged Monument residents to vote against it.

However, the introduction of the resolution sparked a discussion among councilmembers. Councilmember Kimple raised concerns about the council advising residents on how to vote, fearing it might lead to legal complications. Councilmembers Laura Kronick and King also voiced apprehensions, emphasizing the council’s need to remain apolitical. In response, LaKind referenced Rep. Don Wilson’s remarks that previous boards had passed similar resolutions. To navigate the legal aspects of the matter, the council sought guidance from the town attorney, Robert Cole.

Cole clarified that the law allowed the council to disseminate information and cited examples of other clients using similar resolutions. Councilmember Marco Fiorito clarified that the resolution aimed to express the council’s opinion rather than dictate how residents should vote. Kronick emphasized the council’s non-political stance, recommending that they refrain from taking a political position. Although LaKind called for a motion to approve the resolution, no motion was presented, resulting in the resolution being dropped.

Emergency sign ordinance

On Oct. 18, the MTC held a special session to address concerns raised by the Monument Citizens for the First Amendment, a newly formed activist group, regarding the town’s sign ordinance. The group claimed that the ordinance and its enforcement unconstitutionally restricted free speech, particularly related to political signage in public rights of way. An executive session was convened, and after discussions, the council decided not to pass an emergency ordinance temporarily suspending the enforcement of the specific section in question. The council, backed by the town attorney, argued that the existing sign code met legal standards and did not discriminate based on sign content.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next meeting is scheduled for Monday, Nov. 6, but the Monday, Nov. 20, meeting has been cancelled. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see https://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, July 31 – Monument Town Manager Mike Foreman dismissed

By Chris Jeub

This report, posted on wp.ocn.me Aug. 4, covers the special Monument Town Council meeting held July 31, after our August issue had gone to press.

The Town of Monument held a special Town Council meeting on July 31. The council conducted three executive sessions: one to determine positions relative to negotiations, another for legal advice on specific personnel matters, and the third concerning personnel matters involving Town Manager Mike Foreman. All motions to enter the executive sessions passed unanimously.

Following the executive sessions, the council considered Resolution No. 46-2024, which approved an employment separation release and settlement agreement for Foreman. The reason for Foreman’s dismissal was not disclosed. The resolution was discussed and passed with a unanimous vote of 7-0. No public comments were made, and the meeting adjourned.

Chris Jeub may be contacted at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

See additional Monument Town Council meeting coverage starting on page < 9 >.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Town of Monument, Aug. 29. Gleneagle residents voice concerns about potential annexation

By Natalie Barszcz

Town of Monument (TOM) officials held a town hall meeting with residents of adjacent Gleneagle on Aug. 29 to gauge their interest in being annexed into the town.

The public was invited to participate in a question-and-answer session and was encouraged to attend online because of limited space at the Family of Christ Lutheran Church.

Above: From left, Monument Police Chief Patrick Regan, Town Manager Mike Foreman, Mayor Mitch LaKind, Fire Chief Andy Kovacs and Assistant Public Works Director Jeremiah Reichert present information and answer questions to a crowd of Gleneagle residents on Aug. 29 at the Family of Christ Lutheran Church on Baptist Road, Monument. Photo by Natalie Barszcz.

The Gleneagle residents in attendance were largely opposed to an annexation.

The church was at about half capacity with 100 residents attending in person after some heard about the meeting via social media sites and some via a local news media station just an hour before. The meeting was also announced on the TOM website a few days prior. This reporter received notification via Monument Fire District (MFD).

Town Manager Mike Foreman addressed the audience, saying the meeting was purely to garner the thoughts from the Gleneagle residents regarding a potential annexation into the TOM. Moving forward the decision would be entirely upon the will of the residents, at their request with voter approval, he said. Gleneagle had a population of 6,649 in 2020.

Mayor Mitch LaKind said he appreciated the turnout and would love to hear the residents’ thoughts. During the July Fourth Street Fair, several residents approached him saying, “We can’t wait to annex into the town,” he said. He wished he had taken the names of the residents, but the subject of annexation had not been discussed with the Monument Town Council, only with Foreman. The town does have a state-mandated 3-mile potential annexation plan but cannot implement any plan until the residents agree, he said.

Fire Chief Andy Kovacs explained the merger process between MFD and Donald Wescott Fire Protection District (DWFPD) and said a consolidation discussion between the fire districts had been coming together over the last two years. He also said that before the merger began, DWFPD had a contract with American Medical Rescue ambulance, but 80% of the time it was responding to calls in Colorado Springs and not in Gleneagle. The combined district now has Advance Life Support ambulances at Station 4 and 5 and another at Station 1 on Highway 105, reducing response times to service Gleneagle.

DWFPD will have a ballot measure in November seeking to equalize the two-mill levy the Gleneagle residents are being assessed, and at the completion of the merger next year the residents will receive a reduction from 21.9 mills to 18.4 mills. Residents can read what has been going on over the past two years by examining the MFD Feasibility Study, the 2021-22 annual reports, and the Joint Factual Summary at www.monumentfire.org. MFD is a special district and not affiliated with the TOM, he said.

Note: Most of the DWFPD and MFD boards of directors attended the meeting. See https://www.ocn.me/v23n8.htm#dwfpd and www.ocn.me/v23n9.htm#mfd.

Monument Police Chief Patrick Regan said when the idea was brought to his attention, he was asked about the benefits to providing service to Gleneagle. Monument Police Department (MPD) has a budget for 27 officers and is one of only a few fully staffed departments, with a retired military corporal providing training. A dedicated tax revenue supports the Police Department, and in the future the headquarters may move away from the Town Hall to a central location, closer to Gleneagle.

The biggest benefit to Gleneagle residents would be an increased patrol presence, including drive throughs, responding to requests for investigation, and code enforcement issues. MPD has already been assisting in Gleneagle, providing backup for the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office. The department would assist either way, but annexation would require hiring about 15 officers, costing about $2 million (including equipment) in the first year and would not be lucrative, he said.

Foreman said policing is provided from the general fund, about $2.6 million from property taxes and sales taxes, and a dedicated 0.5 cent sales tax is collected throughout Monument, generating about $1.7 million for MPD.

Assistant Public Works Director Jeremiah Reichert said the Public Works Department had no interest in promoting annexation and it was a trickle-down decision. Public works departments across the nation are operating underneath what they receive, and adding more infrastructure would not be lucrative. He talked about the lifespan of roads, typically 25-30 years, for sewer, sanitary and storm structures, about 40-50 years, and water main infrastructure lasts about 75-100 years. For maintenance and replacement costs, there is always a greater need than funds provide.

Annexation would not be a “cash cow for the Public Works Department with every dollar coming in trickling down to just a dime.” The TOM has about 29 miles of roadway responsibility, and Gleneagle has 18 miles, and about $25 million likely would be needed for the additional infrastructure and some additional maintenance staff, he said.

Here are some of the questions and comments:

  • “We don’t need annexation, it’s more bureaucracy in the safest part of the county.”
  • “Is the fire department dependent on annexation?”
  • “The boundaries of the annexation need to be clarified?”
  • “The new Property Tax Assessment numbers are not beneficial in swaying a decision.”
  • “What the TOM has done with their downtown area, allowing developers to infest the town like locusts is not inspiring, and the annexation appears to be greed driven by the new assessments, it looks like a disingenuous money grab, and more honesty is needed.”
  • “We do not want any other water, sewer district, or electric company, and with only one school, Gleneagle has a great thing going, we don’t need annexation.”
  • “How would it affect Antelope Trails Elementary School, school districting and D20?”
  • “It was disappointing to find out about the meeting from Nextdoor.com on Aug. 25, prompting a canvass of the neighborhood to get the word out.”
  • “I found out about the meeting about 90 minutes beforehand, and the presentations look time consuming, just how long had the town been planning the meeting?”
  • “The communication is abysmal, I heard about it on the 5 p.m. news on Channel 5.
  • “Pleasant View Estates residents were not notified; we are not part of Gleneagle.”
  • “Are the Monument residents satisfied with the performance of the Public Works Department?”
  • “Growth looks out of control and over expanded, and why did Donala Water and Sanitation District (DWSD) help Monument out with water about five years ago?”
  • “This looks like a water grab, and Gleneagle has the best water in the area, with a separate aquifer from Denver and its own wells.”

Several residents said they were confused about why the meeting was organized, and the majority expressed their appreciation for the fire and police departments.

In response, LaKind said he had not been involved with organizing the meeting and there had been zero discussion at the Monument Town Council meetings. He said it was no skin off his back whether annexation is pursued or not, the town would have less work, no additional requirements, and no legal fees. Monument is not making money out of annexation, and there are other Town Council members to ask and meeting minutes to confirm. He wished the residents that approached him at the Street Fair had attended the meeting. Monument has no control over Colorado Springs annexing Gleneagle and the residents can choose to do nothing or go with Colorado Springs, he said.

Kovacs said MFD is already serving the Gleneagle district and east to Highway 83 (Station 5), and annexation would not change the level of service. However, if Gleneagle residents were to decide to annex into Colorado Springs, MFD would have to negotiate the sale of Stations 4 and 5, retain the apparatus and have 24 firefighters to either absorb some into the remaining stations or lay them off. The greatest loss would be losing the firefighters, he said.

Foreman said he had organized the meeting, in an effort to hear from the residents, and based on the feedback received, it is to do nothing, and he said in response:

  • The meeting was announced on the town website and via multiple social media sites last week.
  • Gleneagle residents would be eligible to run for office in Monument, vote for ballot measures, and make decisions.
  • If annexation were to go ahead, residents would pay 7.63% sales tax and the extra 1 cent that Gleneagle and some Monument residents pay to support the voter-approved Pikes Peak Rural Transportion Authority for road maintenance, capital projects and transportation needs.
  • Monument property taxes are assessed 5.75 mills.
  • The annexation boundaries to the east had not been worked out before the meeting but would likely extend to Roller Coaster Road.
  • Gleneagle’s neighbors to the north reside in Triview Metropolitan District (TMD), a separate special district with different taxation, managing its own wells, roads, and infrastructure, to include the construction of the Northern Delivery System pipeline project.

LaKind said the overlay of the school districts would not change, and that the TOM only has one school within the town; the rest are located in unincorporated El Paso County. DWSD would still provide the water and sanitation to the residents. The property tax bills from the El Paso County treasurer break down how much is paid into the districts by each resident. The school districts are self-governing and there would be no change there, he said.

Note: None of the water districts in northern El Paso County has its own exclusive aquifer. They do operate their own wells within their districts, typically extracting groundwater from the Denver and Arapahoe aquifers. Districts have existing interconnects should emergencies occur, and any water exchanged between districts would be purchased or replenished. See www.ocn.me/v16n9.htm#tmd. DWSD supplied TMD in late June/early July 2016 after a 5-foot break occurred. DWSD was reimbursed $151,943 for providing the water. See www.triviewmetrodistrict.com. Residents of Monument receive electricity service from Mountain View Electric Association.

Resident Jones said the Gleneagle community was not fully represented at the meeting, and it is not fair to shut it down or go forward because most of the residents did not receive any information or notification. As strong as the meeting is against annexation, there has to be more representation from the neighborhood and more communication, she said.

Foreman said the meeting was preliminary and the boundaries for annexation were not defined before the meeting and that would require working with the county. If the residents want to reach out to the TOM staff, that would be the next step. Any annexation would require 51% voter approval and requires resident initiation. He apologized for the missteps in communication and thanked the residents for attending the meeting.

In conclusion, the last resident to speak requested a show of hands for or against annexation. The majority of residents stood in opposition to any annexation and the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.

Note: On Aug. 30, a letter of apology from the town manager to the residents of Gleneagle was posted at www.townofmonument.org.

Natalie Barszcz can be reached at nataliebarszcz@ocn.me.

Photo caption: From left, Monument Police Chief Patrick Regan, Town Manager Mike Foreman, Mayor Mitch LaKind, Fire Chief Andy Kovacs and Assistant Public Works Director Jeremiah Reichert present information and answer questions to a crowd of Gleneagle residents on Aug. 29 at the Family of Christ Lutheran Church on Baptist Road, Monument. Photo by Natalie Barszcz.

Other Town of Monument articles

Monument Town Council, Sept. 5 and 18. Unanimous vote hopes to put ethics allegations to rest

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council met twice in September to swear in and promote new officers and staff, pass ordinances to clean up the town’s permitting code, and grant the local ice cream shop a liquor license to expand its services. The council also broke into executive session, of which the mayor abstained, to prepare a response for two remaining ethics charges from an independent investigation into a previous council meeting. The resolution, which passed unanimously, was expressed with hope that this would end “frivolous allegations.”

Promotions.

On Sept. 5, Police Chief Patrick Regan administered the oaths of office to three new police officers: Pablo Barrientos, Morgan Chapman, and William Rios, underscoring their commitment to serving the town. A noteworthy promotion took place as Deputy Town ClerkTina Erickson was elevated to the position of town clerk. Mayor Mitch LaKind remarked that it was “long overdue.” Erickson reflected on her journey, stating, “I started in 2017 working as a front desk admin, and now here we are.” Erickson had successfully passed the Colorado Municipal Clerks Association examination, solidifying her qualifications for this pivotal role within the community’s administration.

All ordinances pass unanimously.

The council passed four ordinances unanimously.

  • Ordinance No. 18-2023: The council addressed an inconsistency in the Monument Municipal Code related to the approval process for final plats. Town Planner Jeff Liljegren explained, “Current code contradicts itself in approval of final plats, creating confusion.” The change mandates public hearings before the Planning Commission and Town Council for Final Plat applications. Councilmember Marco Fiorito led a short discussion about updating language in the code to reflect “Town Council” instead of “Board of Trustees” in line with the Home Rule Charter, a change anticipated following the 2022 election.
  • Ordinance No. 19-2023: Liljegren presented this ordinance which focused on amending a section of the Municipal Code related to signs and awnings. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the revision, simplifying the code and ensuring its coherence. This change was deemed necessary as it, in the words of Erickson, “removed chapters that are confusing.”
  • Ordinance No. 20-2023: Town Attorney Bob Cole presented an ordinance that approved a real property exchange with Porchlight Properties LLC. This exchange was designed to benefit the town’s water supply system by securing property where a new well sits. Councilmember Steve King inquired about potential implications for the Santa Fe Trail and right-of-way for expanding Beacon Lite Road. Town Manager Mike Foreman clarified that adequate right-of-way would be available for road widening as the area develops.
  • Ordinance No. 21-2023: In a presentation by Foreman, the council authorized the acquisition of real property described as Lot 2, Block 1, Buttonwood Park Subdivision No. 2, located near the current Town Hall. For several years, the town had been trying to purchase these lots for the benefit of the community. King, seeking clarification, asked if this ordinance committed the town to the purchase, and Foreman emphasized that negotiations and further studies would be conducted in future executive sessions.

Executive session addressed ethics complaint.

The council convened an executive session on Sept. 18. This session delved into two critical topics: 1. regarding personnel matters involving the town manager and 2. regarding the partial dismissal and ethics complaint from the Independent Ethics Commission. Attorney Cole presided and Mayor LaKind abstained.

The complaint encompassed several issues related to town staff, with most of the complaints being dismissed by the state commission. However, two allegations moved forward. First, it was alleged that Mayor LaKind advised the council on a matter in which he had a personal interest. Secondly, there were concerns about the mayor’s possible conflict of interest during the April 11 meeting of the Town Council. During this meeting, the council had approved payment of Mayor LaKind’s legal invoice for work that had been deemed beneficial to the town.

Cole expressed his opinion that these complaints appeared to be an attempt to “harass and embarrass” the new Town Council. He further explained that when faced with tort claims, the town has a responsibility to defend its personnel. The resolution passed during the session directing the town attorney and staff to provide a response to the complaints, emphasizing the alignment of interests between the mayor and the town

Councilmember Ken Kimple inquired about the deadline for the response, to which Cole responded, “By September 21.” Kimple termed the situation “a shame” and suggested that “some folks just can’t let go.” Fiorito expressed concerns about the use of taxpayer funds to defend against what he perceived as frivolous complaints, stating, “This resolution sets the tone for future participants that ‘we will defend you to the very end,’ especially against innuendo that has no merit.” Councilmember Jim Romanello, who ran against LaKind during the election, stated, “There was absolutely no influence or coercion, and there was nothing improper at all with the April 11 meeting.”

Councilmember Laura Kronick expressed the hope that this resolution would bring an end to the matter, likening it to “cutting the head from the snake.” Councilmember King emphasized the council’s unanimous approval, with advice from the town lawyer, regarding what constituted personal expenses and what benefitted the town. He stressed that the core issue revolved around whether they were coerced in their decision-making, which he saw as an attack on their integrity.

The resolution was passed with unanimous support from the council, 6-0.

2024 budget and new liquor license.

The council engaged in a detailed discussion regarding the 2024 budget. Director of Finance Mona Hirjoi highlighted significant increases in workers’ compensation and property and casualty expenses, with both rising by 75% and 49%, respectively, from 2023 to 2024. The primary reason cited for these increases is the growth in employment. However, the council was reassured that the general fund balance would be easily funded, with no need to tap into reserves. Mayor LaKind inquired about the delayed hiring of a tax collector position, which was approved nine months ago, expressing concern about the timeline. Hirjoi explained the complexities of the hiring process, taking about two years, but LaKind emphasized the need to fulfill promises made to voters under Home Rule.

The meeting also included a public hearing regarding a new lodging and entertainment liquor license application for Lolley’s Ice Cream at 174 Washington St. The application was filed in August and was found to be in compliance with Monument’s ordinances. Owners Shelley and Dustin Sapp were present to answer questions, and Mayor LaKind praised the renovation efforts of the ice cream shop. Councilmember Kimple inquired about the type of liquor and raised questions about parking and capacity, which were satisfactorily addressed by Shelley Sapp. Terri Hayes, president and CEO of the Chamber of Commerce, testified in support of the application, emphasizing the Sapp family’s dedication to renovating the corner lot where Lolley’s Ice Cream sits. The application was approved unanimously, 7-0.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next two regular meetings are scheduled for Monday, Oct. 2 and Monday, Oct. 16. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Note: The Monument Planning Commission did not meet in September.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, Aug. 7 – “Shoddy work,” says mayor, before voting “no” on change order

By Chris Jeub

One public Monument Town Council meeting took place in August which included two presentations, both underscoring the town’s dedication to preserving its heritage and enhancing its natural landscapes. An ordinance allowing a local health facility to host classes in its downtown studio was unanimously approved.

The mayor cast a dissenting vote coupled with stern admonition for a change order request by the director of Public Works.

The meeting also featured Monument’s police chief explaining the town’s support for Monument Academy’s School Resource Officer (SRO) which prompted concerns from one councilmember.

Mayor votes against “shoddy work”

Resolution No. 58-2023, concerning a change order for the Wagner Construction Contract for the new 2-million-gallon Tank Pipeline Project, spurred a thorough discussion within the Town Council. The resolution ultimately passed with a 6-1 majority, Mayor LaKind casting the sole dissenting vote. LaKind expressed dissatisfaction with the project’s progression.

During the exchange, LaKind questioned the project’s timeline and challenged Director of Public Works Thomas Tharnish on the lay-down date of the fiber and sewer lines. Tharnish explained the complexities of the AT&T fiber line’s installation and the challenges it posed due to its unconventional placement. The discussion escalated as LaKind criticized the project’s engineering efforts, calling it “shoddy work,” citing multiple issues that had led to cost overruns. LaKind voiced frustration over what he perceived as insufficient engineer efforts and expressed his belief that the engineering firm, Forsgren Associates, should be financially accountable for the $55,000 cost overrun.

Councilmembers engaged in a deliberation on the situation. Kronick raised questions about Palmer Lake’s cooperation, while King and Fiorito discussed the expense of the project and the necessity of proper bore work. The conversation pivoted to accountability, with LaKind urging Tharnish to take proactive measures to ensure that similar issues do not arise in the future. The mayor pressed for a commitment to avoid further cost overruns and to take necessary precautions to prevent reoccurrence.

In response, Director Tharnish pledged his best efforts to prevent future incidents but acknowledged the absence of a fail-safe guarantee. Foreman intervened, proposing to take a proactive stance by ensuring a comprehensive re-evaluation of all factors involved. This commitment was aimed at assuring the council that due diligence would be exercised to prevent further financial implications. Even with this commitment, LaKind voted “no” for the change order, the only councilmember to do so.

Monument Cemetery and Northern Nature Center

John Howe and Michael Weinfeld presented an insightful history of the Monument Cemetery, uncovering more than anticipated. Initially envisioned as a several months-long project, it took 13 years, resulting in a 73-page report. Among the revelations, 150 unknown Plaster of Paris gravestones were replaced by granite stones for an Eagle Scout project. Another 36 granite stones were made by the Public Works Department for the remaining unknown graves. Their research revealed discrepancies that were rectified for accuracy. Howe and Weinfeld advocated for the Public Works Department to continue maintaining the headstones and proposed installing an informational kiosk for visitors.

Councilmember Steve King posed an intriguing question about the cemetery’s most prominent resident, prompting discussion about notables like “Freddy Krueger” and “Anna Frank,” interesting names but not the famous originals. Councilmember Laura Kronick praised the report, while Fiorito encouraged Howe and Weinfeld to collaborate with the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs’ History Journal for more exposure. The presentation garnered accolades and recognition for their volunteer work. See cemetery records photo and caption on page < 20 >.

Todd Marts, executive director of the El Paso County Parks Department, introduced the Northern Nature Center project. The endeavor began with a feasibility study in 2019, culminating in a focus on Fox Run Regional Park. Marts emphasized community involvement in shaping the park’s development. The planned nature center, acting as a welcoming hub, will include a tower and canopy walk. Anchored in the mission to “connect and inspire stewards,” the center’s architecture reflects this intent. The project carries a price tag of $12 million, with fundraising set through 2024 and construction scheduled for 2025. Councilmembers raised questions about conservation easements, Native American history, and park security, receiving affirming responses from Marts.

Bloom Healing Arts approved for yoga studio

Ordinance No. 17-2023, an ordinance approving a conditional use for a yoga studio at 267 B N. Washington St., passed with a vote of 7-0. The ordinance sought approval for a recreation and entertainment, indoor use—a departure from its existing classification as a “clinic.” The applicant, Bloom Healing Arts, desired to extend its services by offering open yoga classes to the public, necessitating the reclassification and a conditional use permit.

The history behind the application traced back to the town directors’ initial permission for the location to function as a “clinic.” However, with aspirations to provide broader recreational opportunities to the community, the applicant sought a change in classification to accommodate their vision for a yoga studio. Town staff determined that the reclassification fulfilled all the requisite review criteria and, noteworthy, no new construction was anticipated. Moreover, staff recognized the yoga studio as being “generally consistent” with the Comprehensive Plan, further underscoring its alignment with the town’s broader developmental vision.

Terry Hayes, president and chief executive officer of the Tri-Lakes Chamber of Commerce, expressed its support for this conditional use application, citing the significance of such an establishment for the town’s vibrant downtown area, calling it “a perfect addition” to the downtown landscape. Amid the discussions, Katrina Maldonado, owner of Bloom Healing Arts, extended gratitude to the town staff for its role in facilitating the process.

School Resource Officers for Monument Academy

Monument Police Chief Patrick Regan led the presentation of Resolution No. 48-2023, addressing the matter of School Resource Officers (SROs) for Monument Academy. Following the successful deployment of an SRO during the past year, Monument Academy’s leadership expressed the desire to continue this program and expand it to encompass a second SRO for their second campus. Under the proposed agreement, Monument Academy would contribute 75% of the salary while the Town of Monument would cover the remaining 25%. The understanding was that 75% of the officer’s time would be spent on campus, with the remainder allocated to Police Department duties.

Councilmember Kenneth Kimple raised concerns about potentially diverting officers from the town’s police force. He asked questions regarding the inclusion of all schools in District 38 and why SROs weren’t provided to all. Chief Regan explained that the SRO program was still in its early stages and expressed a desire to have officers in every school. Town Manager Mike Foreman noted that other District 38 schools were utilizing El Paso County SROs and wished to continue with that arrangement.

The annexation status of Monument schools was discussed, with Councilmember Marco Fiorito highlighting the distinction. Further inquiry arose about extending SRO coverage to St. Peter School, to which Regan expressed willingness, contingent on available resources. The conversation touched on the equitable distribution of resources, with Kimple emphasizing the importance of fair treatment across schools.

The motion to approve the resolution was made by Fiorito and passed with unanimous agreement. However, Kimple reiterated his concern for equal treatment among all schools. The resolution’s approval reflected the Town Council’s support for providing SROs to Monument Academy, while ongoing discussions centered on the broader scope of SRO distribution among schools in District 38.

The second Town Council meeting originally set for Aug. 21 was cancelled to make time for a training session.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next two regular meetings are scheduled for Tuesday, Sept. 5 (the day after Labor Day) and Monday, Sept. 18. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, Aug. 9 – Variance approved for affordable housing project

By Leslie Hanks

The Aug. 9 Monument Planning Commission meeting was attended by Commissioners Chair Martin Trujillo, Vice Chair Danny Ours, Cathy Green, Sean Zernikow, Ray Egley, Greg Collins, and Chad Smith.

The planning staff started the meeting by explaining that the planning commissioners acting as the Board of Adjustment was appropriate. According to the Home Rule Charter, the Board of Adjustment has five members and the Planning Commission has seven. The staff said this was consistent with the charter which states: “the responsibilities of the BOA are to be absorbed by the Planning Commission, since positions on the adjustment board are difficult to fill.”

The first order of business was a proposed variance for a Final Plat of a proposed affordable housing project at 245 Front St., which had been previously approved but because of a staff error, the required applicant signatures were not submitted in a timely fashion. Without the variance, the applicant would be required to start the process over from the beginning.

This project is intended to provide affordable housing for community members. Several who testified, during public comment, that they were in favor of the variance mentioned Monument firefighters and first responders as those who might benefit the most.

Vice Chair Ours raised a question about language in the variance resolution, which implied that the applicant had somehow been at fault, when in fact it was determined that the planning staff had been in error. There was agreement that the resolution should be slightly reworded to properly reflect what had transpired and to clarify any potential confusion.

Planning Commission attorney Bob Cole had proposed that the applicant be required to sign a liability waiver, but community member Bonnie Hildebrandt asked the commission to support the variance without the liability waiver. Commissioner Green agreed that the variance should proceed without the liability waiver and suggested that the code should be revised so that this situation couldn’t happen again. She also raised concerns about whether the variance was the appropriate remedy for the situation.

Following the discussion about those technical issues, the Planning Commission passed the proposed variance unanimously, 7-0.

The remainder of the meeting was devoted to several other code revisions where language clarifications should make applicant requirements clearer and assist staff in being as specific as possible to avoid confusion.

**********

The next Planning Commission meeting will be held on Sept. 13 at Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The agenda and packet can be found at https://townofmonument.org.

Leslie Hanks can be reached at lesliehanks@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Town Council, July 17 – Annexation of Monument Ridge fails

By Chris Jeub

One Monument Town Council meeting was held in July, but it was as long as two as heated exchanges among developers, councilmembers, and neighbors lasted late into the night. The debate surrounded two subdivisions known as Monument Ridge West and East, 161 acres at the southwest and southeast corners of I-25 and County Line Road. This was their final step in their application for annexation into the town of Monument. Though their application was previously approved by the Planning Commission (see article on page < 4 >) and supported by town staff, the Town Council overruled both and voted against annexation with a 2-5 vote. The developer withdrew its plans, and the future of Monument Ridge West and East now goes to El Paso County.

Background

Planning Director Shelia Booth presented the first resolution for annexation from El Paso County into Monument, known as Monument Ridge No. 1 West. The proposed annexation concerns a 90-acre area on the west side of I-25 south of County Line Road. While the town’s Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Mixed Use, the applicant seeks to rezone it to Residential. Town staff supports this change, as the current housing density alongside the dedicated open space in Douglas County north of County Line Road does not warrant multi-use zoning.

The annexation agreement includes provisions for residential attached units but prohibits higher densities and multi-family housing. Despite initially facing a close vote of 3-4 against the proposal in the Planning Commission, it passed with a 4-3 vote when certain conditions were set. The zoning proposal was later approved by the Planning Commission with a vote of 6-1, and town staff recommended approval, emphasizing that annexation would allow the town to oversee the development and ensure alignment with the community vision of Monument’s Comprehensive Plan.

Booth continued her presentation for the second resolution for annexation, known as Monument Ridge No. 2 East. This annexation was contingent upon the successful annexation of Monument Ridge No. 1 West. The proposed annexation area covers 71 acres and is intended for Residential zoning, accommodating about 383 dwelling units. Additionally, the annexation proposal includes plans for a business campus south of the residential area, featuring office, research and development, and educational facilities (excluding manufacturing). As with the first resolution, the applicant’s choice to propose residential zoning is due to the lack of sufficient resident numbers to support Mixed Use zoning. The Planning Commission approved the proposal with a 6-1 vote, and town staff recommended approval.

Developer presentation

Development Manager Ray O’Sullivan presented the applicant’s case for annexation. O’Sullivan began by explaining that the property owner was encouraged by the county to develop with Monument due to water availability. Initially the applicant considered simply paying for water service, but they were asked to explore annexation as an alternative. Working with the previous town staff, they devised a development plan that aligned with the town’s preferences. However, when they presented this plan to the Planning Commission, they encountered significant community opposition, which left them “feeling unwelcome.” O’Sullivan emphasized that the property was already zoned for their proposed development in the county, but their goal was to create a more pleasant community that residents would desire, rather than an eyesore. They were seeking RA zoning, but the commission recommended 2.5-acre lots, a suggestion O’Sullivan found unprecedented in his career. He expressed concern that without annexation, they would be left with no choice but to develop under county regulations.

Following O’Sullivan’s presentation, project consultant David Whitehead of Whitehead Engineering delved into the technical aspects of the proposal. He highlighted the collaborative work they had undertaken with the town staff. However, Councilmember Steve King raised a significant concern about Slide 26 of the presentation, which indicated $5.4 million in infrastructure fees. King doubted the ability for this to happen with unknowns surrounding future water developments (like the Loop system) still under review. Councilmember Marco Fiorito disagreed, viewing the $5.4 million as a potential benefit, as it would provide the town with an influx of funds to purchase renewable water. He argued that even without annexation, the town would still need renewable water and that this presented a potential windfall. King remained cautious, emphasizing the uncertainty around the possibility of acquiring the necessary pipes to bring water into Monument. Fiorito stressed that without the funds from annexation, the town’s water plans would remain stagnant.

King also expressed concern about the trees on the property and questioned the possibility of using or relocating them. In response, Whitehead explained that some trees needed to be removed for the health and safety of the community, a decision supported by the Fire Department. Whitehead presented slides detailing the trees, trails, and open spaces planned for the development, but King still had reservations about the number of trees and how the “majority of trees” would be determined.

King then questioned why the proposed densities in the development were higher than those allowed by the county, to which Booth responded that it didn’t make economic sense to keep them lower. King suggested that the property might undergo a Planned Unit Development (PUD) process if annexation didn’t happen, which could be a better option. He stated that, while it might not be what the applicant wanted to hear, he believed that the proposal was not in the best interests of the town.

Councilmember Kenneth Kimple and Mayor Mitch LaKind both inquired about the possibility of reducing the number of dwellings, but Whitehead stated that they were not willing to do so at the moment. Whitehead emphasized their commitment to open spaces and mentioned that the plan included funding for the town’s parks. “I don’t want your money,” LaKind snapped, adding that he preferred to see parks included in the development rather than receiving money for them.

Throughout the exchange, King reiterated his primary concern about the trees on the property, indicating that it was a crucial issue for him. The discussion highlighted various points of contention, including the proposed densities, park inclusion, and the fate of the existing trees on the property.

Community input mixed

Several individuals expressed their opposition to the proposed development during the meeting. The owner of Colorado Heights Camping Resort, which neighbors the proposed development, worried about the potential closure of Monument Hill Road and the impact on his business, expressing fears of RVs navigating through the new neighborhood. Michael Barber, an architect and neighbor, criticized the insensitivity of the plans toward the existing trees and views and recommended against approval. Other opponents cited issues with the proposed housing density overwhelming the current infrastructure, difficulties in transplanting trees as the developer suggested, and apprehensions about crime associated with multi-family housing.

On the other hand, some individuals spoke in favor of the proposed development. Theresa Sidebotham, the owner of Telios Law also neighboring the development, highlighted the importance of annexation to maintain tax revenues for the town and advocated for the proposal’s low-density approach. Another property owner adjacent to the site praised the proposal for preserving a gateway to Monument and endorsed apartments in the area as recommended by developers. Chris Fox, a resident in the vicinity, expressed preference for having a say in the development through annexation rather than leaving it to the county, indicating support for town oversight. Other supporters emphasized the developer’s responsiveness to community concerns, the potential benefits of more apartments for housing affordability, and the belief that the town should move forward with the development to maintain some control over the process.

Whitehead assured the council that Monument Hill Road would not be eliminated by their development and that sound barriers would be installed along the highway to mitigate noise impact. Whitehead defended the annexation as not unusual and stated that plans were in place for constructing sanitary sewer systems, backed by a letter of approval from the district for water supply. Whitehead did not directly address concerns toward views or the apprehensions about high-density housing and potential impacts on neighboring properties. Instead, he emphasized that the presented zoning was preliminary, acknowledging that much work remained ahead in the development process, and clarified that the project did not include any apartments, which had been a point of contention raised by some citizens.

Proposal fails and applicant withdraws

Following the citizens’ comments and the developer’s response, the debate among the council members centered on several key issues. King expressed his belief that the property should be handled as a PUD and criticized the proposed RA zoning, emphasizing concerns about clear-cutting and the lack of tree preservation. Councilmembers Jim Romanello and Fiorito supported keeping the development within Monument, expressing distrust in the county’s handling of the project and the need to find a compromise. LaKind voiced his major concern about the density, hoping for a resolution through compromise. Councilmember Laura Kronick asked if an agreement could be reached, leading to a recess for private discussions. However, no compromise was achieved.

The council then voted on two resolutions related to the annexation. Resolution No. 51-2023, which outlined findings of fact regarding the proposed annexation, passed unanimously with a 7-0 vote. However, Resolution No. 52-2023, which would have approved the annexation agreement with the developer, failed with a vote of 2-5 against. Councilmembers King, Kimple, Kronick, Sana Abbott, and Mayor LaKind voted against, while Romanello and Fiorito voted in favor. LaKind wished the developers luck with the county, and King warned citizens that the proposal would now be subject to county jurisdiction.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next two regular meetings are scheduled for Monday, Aug. 7 and Monday, Aug. 21. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Planning Commission, June 28 – Town Planning Commission recommends approval of Monument Ridge 1 and 2 despite community concerns

By Leslie Hanks

The June 28 Monument Planning Commission hearing on Monument Ridge 1 and 2 was standing room only, with many people forced to stand in the hallway and listen to the hearing over the internet on their phones.

Chairperson Martin Trujillo, Vice Chairperson Danny Ours and Commissioners Nicholson, Greg Collins, Sean Zernickow, and Ray Egley were in attendance. Alternates Joe Kneedler and Chad Smith were sworn in as regular members for the meeting. Commissioner Cathy Green was in attendance online as a non-voting member.

The proposed annexation and zoning proposal had previously been heard and tabled Nov. 22, 2022.

Planning staff reviewed and recommended the annexing and rezoning of Monument Ridge 1, 90.98 acres on the southwest corner of County Line Road and I-25. The assertion was made that the property is contiguous to Monument, as required by state statute. However, it was later discussed that it was a “flagpole zoning,” which involves annexing narrow parcels of land to reach another parcel under annexation consideration. Staff member Sheila Booth explained that the developer was asked to resubmit the proposal so that Monument could have control of the project rather than El Paso County. Apparently, the project would be phased in until the missing 16 acre-feet of water required at the proposed density is acquired.

The staff recommended annexation and Residential Attached (RA) zoning.

There was discussion of boarding house and multifamily use being removed as possible uses.

The staff noted there were no letters of support received but there were letters of opposition.

The staff then presented plans for Monument Ridge 2 at the southeast corner of County Line Road and I-25, which is a 71.01-acre parcel. Annexation was recommended with RA 358 patio homes/condos. They stated the contiguity requirement was met. Woodmoor Water and Sanitation (WWSD) would provide the water and there would be a metro district. Both proposals are within the town’s recently adopted Three Mile Plan.

The developer proposed creating roads, and there was discussion of upgrading Beacon Lite Road and creating a roundabout at Misty Acres and County Line Road.

The staff recommended approval.

The staff stated that public notice was given and that the proposal complies with the 2017 Comprehensive Plan and meets Colorado Revised Statutes.

The developer’s representative, David Whitehead, explained that the Town of Monument invited him to re-apply. He explained that the roundabout was determined by a traffic study that included the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and Douglas County and that the roundabout can’t encroach into Douglas County. CDOT supports the transportation proposal.

There were many public comments, including:

  • “Why did the applicant withdraw and re-apply? What initiated the re-application?”
  • “What is proposed to accommodate the children, which will be part of this huge proposal?”
  • “Why were the citizens of Woodmoor not interacted with on a proposal of this magnitude when they will be most directly impacted?”
  • “A proposal of this magnitude will obviously impact crime. Why isn’t there a transition between Large Lot Residential and Residential Attached proposal?” Isn’t this completely out of character with the current 2-acre lots adjacent?”
  • “What are the children going to do, since the proposal is isolated and there is nothing in the plan to address the need?”
  • “What are the names of those who asked this developer to re-apply?”
  • “What will the impact to the police budget be?”
  • “Is this part of the ‘affordable housing’ push by Governor Polis?”
  • “Never ceases to amaze that developers ignore the Comprehensive Plan and the voice of the citizens. I worked on the 2017 Comp Plan, and this proposal is not in compliance with the 2017 Comprehensive Plan.”
  • “What about the wetlands in the area? How will the developer mitigate?”
  • “We don’t have enough water!”
  • “Do we want Jackson Creek-type densities on Monument Hill?”
  • “Why would we do a radical change from the current country feel?”
  • “The Monument grocery store isn’t adequate for this high-density proposal.”
  • “How can staff recommend going with this plan when it is short 16 acre-feet of water?” Denver, Dawson, and Arapahoe Sands aquifers are nearly dry.”
  • “You came back with basically the same proposal as last November; you can’t be surprised that we care about our community and that’s what you’re seeing.”
  • “The developer is not looking at this from the perspective of the people most affected.”
  • “The Planning Commission should approve annexation but deny the density.”

After the public comment period, Booth was asked to address the questions raised. She noted that Colorado Revised Statutes requires annexation and zoning be voted on simultaneously. She also explained that the school district was notified and was invited to submit comments. Booth stated that WWSD says they have enough water for the project. The question of adequate police coverage brought the reply that there are the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office and local police, “and property tax will cover the costs.”

A question raised about a wetland on the property sparked a discussion about whether it is a “regulatory wetland” and whether there is a requirement from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to address.

The staff noted that public notification was done properly and that the school district can ask for land dedication or “fees in lieu” but that ultimately the district will decide. In response to the question about how property values will be impacted, the staff remarked that that question has no easy answer.

During the staff discussion about water concerns, it was explained that the west side of I-25 proposal will be served by Monument Water and Sanitation and asserted that concern about the water shortage doesn’t take into consideration “Water Wise” programs or low-flow toilets.

In a closing remark, the developer said that from an economic standpoint, any lower density would make it impossible to justify the necessary infrastructure.

Finally, the staff recommended that concerned citizens should be sure to attend the July Town Council meeting to express their concerns.

Votes on the proposals:

Commissioner Ours’ motion to approve annexation on proposal 1, minus boarding houses, manufactured housing, and multifamily, failed 4-3.

Non-voting Commissioner Green (a city planner for 30 years) voiced a concern about giving too much away. “This is the time to require more from the developer.”

Ours responded to the question of “How can staff recommend (the proposal)” with his opinion that staff does an excellent job. He’s “hoping we can work things out here to be able to give Town Council guidance.” He stated, “We’re interested in the community too,” and that “We’re trying to do the right thing.”

Ours also noted that, “The developer spends millions putting a proposal together and if we vote to deny, we might face a lawsuit.”

Green made additional comments about the disparity between the Comprehensive Plan and these proposals and raised concerns about putting this conceptual plan in an annexation agreement and then the developer would be free to do whatever it wants.

More discussion centered on whether Monument can work with the developer to create a proposal the community can live with, or whether the developer might go back to El Paso County to get what it wants and will likely be granted permission for.

Commissioner Egley raised concerns about the economic impact to Monument.

The developer responded with, “You won’t get sales tax or property tax if we go back to the county.” Egley continued, stating that he is uncomfortable that the flag-pole annexation will leave 1,200 people isolated with no connection to the town and no open space or yards for kids.

The Planning Commission voted to annex both parcels and change the density from RA (Residential Attached) to LLR (Large Lot Residential)—9,000-square-foot lots.

The votes all passed 6-1, with Commissioner Egley voting no on all motions.

The project is recommended to the Monument Town Council for approval.

See the Town Council article on page < 1 >.

**********

The next meeting will be at 6 p.m. Aug. 9. See http://townofmonument.org or call 719-481-2954 for more information.

Leslie Hanks can be contacted at lesliehanks@ocn.me.

Other Monument Planning Commission articles

Monument Town Council, June 5 and 19 – Town Code amendments approved on narrow vote; Wilson sheds light on state bills

By Chris Jeub

During two meetings held in June, the Monument Town Council tackled code amendments, resolutions, and an ordinance. The discussions surrounding the Town Code amendments were lengthy, resulting in a split vote among council members. In addition to these local matters, former Mayor Don Wilson, now serving as the representative for District 20, presented insights on state-level House and Senate bills and their implications for Monument.

Town Code amended on split vote

Ordinance No. 12-2023, which amends four sections of the Town Municipal Code, passed narrowly with a 4-3 vote. Director of Planning Shelia Booth presented the ordinance, highlighting the need for modifications due to window wells being built without easements, in violation of the code. Town staff conducted inquiries with various entities and recommended updating sections related to setbacks and easements as the most effective solution.

However, council members expressed differing opinions on the proposed changes. Mayor Mitch LaKind voiced concerns about imposing mandatory window well covers on homeowners, and Councilmember Marco Fiorito agreed, feeling uncomfortable with the requirement. Councilmember Steve King expressed safety concerns, particularly regarding the reduced clearance between window wells and fences. On the other hand, Councilmember Sana Abbott believed developers should be responsible for installing window well covers due to their cost, while Councilmember Ken Kimple opposed requiring homeowners to do so.

Public comments were divided, with a representative from Challenger Homes supporting the proposed changes, emphasizing the importance of continuing construction based on existing designs. The discussion also touched on other issues, including updating the definition of “Family Child Care” to comply with state law and revising the definition of “Lot Coverage” to address concerns related to smaller parcels.

Ultimately, the ordinance passed with a narrow 4-3 vote, but the handling of the ordinance by town staff was lightly admonished. LaKind stated that combining multiple issues in one ordinance without separation should not happen again. Town Manager Mike Foreman acknowledged the concern and assured the council that their feedback had been heard.

Resolutions passed

Resolution No. 41-2023, a resolution approving a final plat for Home Place Ranch Filing No. 3, passed unanimously. Town Planner Jeff Liljegren presented the project, which is located along Gleneagle Drive between Higby and Baptist Roads. Town staff supported the applicant’s rationale, and a traffic study indicated that the development would include 299 homes and one amenity center with 38 parking spots. Kimple raised concerns about the need for a new traffic study and the noise impact of a pickleball court. Mayor LaKind suggested Kimple bring up a pickleball noise ordinance rather than denying the resolution. Ultimately, the resolution passed with a 7-0 vote.

The second resolution, No. 42-2023, focused on adopting the Town of Monument’s 2023 Three-Mile Plan. Town Planner Shelia Booth explained that the plan places limitations on municipal annexations, restricting the extension of municipal boundaries to no more than three miles in any direction from the existing boundary within a single year. The resolution was previously approved unanimously by the Planning Commission. King sought clarification on whether property not included in the plan could still be annexed, and Booth confirmed that it was possible. The resolution passed with a unanimous 7-0 vote.

Retail paint store approved

Ordinance No. 11-2023, which approves the final planned unit development for the 705 W. Baptist Road Final PUD Plan on 0.73 acre, passed unanimously. Liljegren presented the details on behalf of the applicant. The project aims to establish a 4,500-square-foot retail paint store, a use permitted in the Planned Commercial Development zone. Situated adjacent to AutoZone and Family of Christ Lutheran Church, the project received a favorable recommendation for approval from the staff. Notably, no letters of opposition or agreement were received regarding the project. The Planning Commission expressed unanimous support, granting approval with a 7-0 vote, which subsequently resulted in the successful passage of the ordinance.

Rep. Don Wilson presentation

During his presentation to the Monument Town Council, former Mayor Don Wilson, now the representative for Colorado District 20, provided an overview of several state bills and their potential implications:

  • SB 23-166: This bill, despite Wilson’s opposition, was signed into law by Gov. Jared Polis. It created another state board, despite the presence of similar resources.
  • First Right of Refusal: Wilson highlighted the concern surrounding this proposal, which would have required ranchers to sell houses to municipalities first, including RVs on their driveways. “Fortunately, the governor vetoed this bill,” Wilson said.
  • HB 1120: Wilson expressed displeasure with this bill, which mandates landlords to collaborate with tenants receiving government assistance before evicting them.
  • HB 1255: This bill allows municipalities to disclose reasons for halting growth without completely prohibiting it.
  • SB 23-303: Wilson addressed this bill, introduced by the governor, which aims to impact TABOR refunds. However, due to its complexity, it has led to uncertainty and legal challenges.
  • SB 23-213. Though this controversial land use bill failed to reach the governor’s desk, Wilson predicted it would return in a different form in the future.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The first meeting in July is cancelled to observe the Fourth of July holiday. The next meeting is scheduled for Monday, July 17. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, May 1 and 15 – Midtown Collection of Monument Junction approved on 5-2 vote

By Chris Jeub

A newly appointed Monument chief of police was sworn in on May 15. The Midtown Collection at Monument Junction West Filing No. 1, a controversial Planned Unit Development (PUD) project, was approved on a split vote. A technical glitch led to the failure of the May 15 Town Council meeting to be published online, leaving only the agenda items to be reported on in this issue of OCN.

New chief of police

Patrick Regan was sworn in as the new chief of police for Monument on May 15, ending a five-month vacancy in the position. Regan brings 23 years of law enforcement experience from the Scottsdale Police Department in Arizona, where he served in various roles including undercover narcotics detective, SWAT operator, and internal affairs supervisor. He is a graduate of the FBI National Academy and has extensive executive leadership training. Regan expressed his excitement about joining the Monument community and highlighted his commitment to maintaining a strong relationship with the residents. He plans to increase the number of officers on patrol, enhance community engagement efforts, and focus on collaboration, accountability, and communication within the Police Department.

Above: Patrick Regan had no idea when he got married in Monument in 2012 that he’d return 11 years later as police chief. Regan was sworn in at the Monument Town Council meeting on May 15. He replaces interim chief Tim Johnson who returns to his previous rank of commander. Regan has spent the past 23 years with the Scottsdale, Ariz., Police Department. He served as an undercover narcotics detective, violent crime investigator, Spanish interpreter, gang enforcement supervisor, internal affairs supervisor, patrol watch commander, commander of the special investigations division, and other positions. After being sworn in, Regan said he’s “incredibly excited” about his new position. He said after he married his wife, Bree, they’d been “trying to come back ever since.” Photo by Michael Weinfeld.

Monument Junction

Ordinance No. 10-2023, which approved a Preliminary/Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Midtown Collection at Monument Junction West Filing No. 1, was approved on a 5-2 vote. The project encompasses 21.7 acres with a primary use of single-family detached homes. The development is classified as a mixed-use PUD, surrounded by other PUD-zoned land.

The Monument Planning Commission recommended denial of the plan on April 12 in a 4-3 vote, stating that it did not meet the criteria set forth in the town’s land development code and was inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. However, the town staff recommended approval, asserting that the plan adhered to applicable development standards and was generally consistent with the comprehensive plan.

Andrea Barlow of N.E.S., representing Classic Homes, presented on behalf of the applicant, challenging the denial from the commission. Barlow emphasized the benefits of the proposed public park and highlighted that the land had been zoned for commercial development since the 1980s. The sketch plan, which was approved by the council in 2020, was described as a conceptual plan rather than a precise plan. Barlow pointed out that Commissioner Danny Ours had approved the sketch plan at the time, and the history of the application indicated a track record of approval rather than denial. Barlow explained the recent history of the property:


  • The Village Sketch Plan: Approved on June 15, 2020.

  • Monument Junction West Filing No. 1 Final Plat: Approved on Feb. 7, 2022.

  • Monument Junction Phase 1 (East) Preliminary/Final PUD Plan: Approved on March 21, 2022, with 204 units.

  • Monument Junction Phase 1 (East) Filing No. 1 Final Plat: Approved on July 5, 2022, with 58 units.

  • Monument Junction West Filing No. 1, Lot 4 (Whataburger) Preliminary/Final PUD Plan: Approved on Oct. 17, 2022.

  • Monument Junction West Filing No. 1, Lot 5 (Multi-family) Preliminary/Final PUD Plan: Approved on Oct. 17, 2022, with 240 units.

  • Monument Junction Phase 1 (East) Filing No. 2 Final Plat: Approved on Nov. 21, 2022, with 146 units.

Though the development faced scrutiny from the Planning Commission, the council ultimately decided to approve it by a 5-2 vote, with Councilmembers Kenneth Kimple and Sana Abbott voting against, citing density and traffic concerns. The approval of both the PUD and the final plat marks the end of a challenging development approval process for the Midtown Collection at Monument Junction.

May 15 meeting

Due to a technical failure, the May 15 Town Council meeting failed to publish online. The meeting consisted of the following agenda items:


  1. Town Accountant Mona Hirjoi presented the 2024 budget.

  2. Bob Cole disclosed potential conflicts of interest. A vote was taken to exclude council members with conflicts from consideration, discussions, and voting on relevant matters.

  3. Approval of the Consent Agenda: The consent agenda items approved were the agenda for May 15, 2023, special meeting minutes from April 26, 2023, meeting minutes from May 1, 2023, Resolution No. 34-2023 (on-call engineering service agreement with Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.), and Resolution No. 35-2023 (contract with A-1 Chipseal for the 2023 Chipseal Program).

  4. Proclamation: Mike Foreman presented the Police Week Proclamation.

  5. Presentation: Officer Dakota Degenhart received a medal for saving a life, presented by Foreman.

  6. Chief of Police Patrick J. Regan took the oath of office, administered by Foreman.

  7. Town Attorney Bob Cole initiated a discussion on land acquisition for the Monument Hill Tank Site.

  8. Deputy Clerk Tina Erickson requested a presentation on June 5 from Girls of the West, Pikes Peak Range Riders, and Pikes Peak or Bust Rodeo.
Above: At the May 15 Monument Town Council meeting, Police Officer Dakota Degenhart received a medal for helping to save the life of a person who tried to commit suicide on April 3. Town Manager Mike Foreman said Degenhart and Palmer Lake Officer Eugene Ramirez found the person hanging from a rope in the woods off Red Rocks Drive. By cutting the person down, Foreman said their “quick thinking and teamwork saved a life.” Photo by Michael Weinfeld

Please note that this summary is based solely on the agenda items provided, and further details or discussions that occurred during the meeting are not included.

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next two regular meetings are scheduled for Monday, June 5 and Monday, June 19. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council articles

Monument Town Council, April – Land use bill, investigation loom

By Chris Jeub

The Monument Town Council meetings in April discussed enterprise zones and town investments as well as the looming state Senate Bill 23-213 that would undermine Monument’s permitting and zoning laws. But the majority of April was spent dealing with the independent investigation report presented Dec. 28, 2022, by the former Board of Trustees. Two executive meetings and two special meetings were called to specifically handle the investigation.

Actions include disavowing the results of the independent investigation, reinterpreting the results with a newly employed law firm, paying for the personal legal fees of the mayor, and addressing the CORA request from the previous mayor pro tem. The current board declared the investigation “over” with comments showing hope for the town to “move on.”

Enterprise zones and town investments discussed

On April 3, Town Administrator Laura Hogan presented an opportunity to expand the enterprise zone in Monument. This zone is intended to provide tax credits to businesses, and one area in Monument has recently become eligible. The proposed zone, located between Higby Road and Baptist Road on the east side of Interstate 25, aims to encourage businesses to come to Monument. El Paso County will bring the proposed zone to the state, and community members can help contribute to the development of businesses within the zone and receive tax benefits for doing so.

Council Member Jim Romanello asked for an explanation of the significance of the proposed zone. Hogan explained that it would be beneficial for the entire community. By encouraging businesses to come to Monument, the proposed enterprise zone could bring in new jobs and revenue for the town. Additionally, community members could contribute to the development of the businesses within the zone and receive tax benefits for doing so. Overall, the expansion of the enterprise zone presents an opportunity for growth and development for Monument and its residents.

The Council listened to three presentations discussing the investment of the town’s money. The presentations were given by Katiana Siatras from Wells Fargo, Bob Krug from CSafe, and Max Mojab and Nate Eckloff from Piper Sadler & Co. The Council was interested in investing to make more money due to changing interest rates. There was a discussion of the risks associated with investing with banks, and securities were recommended as the most secure and liquid type of investment. Town Manager Mike Foreman is seeking direction to find the best proposal for the town.

Colorado Senate Bill 23-213

The Monument Council discussed state Senate Bill 23-213, which they claim would override the town’s zoning and permit laws and transfer power to the state. All Council members stated that they believed this would be an overreach of state power and could affect local issues such as housing, water, infrastructure, and police. Council Member Steve King expressed concern that the bill would benefit “millionaire owners” of multi-family housing units and could lead to the construction of rental buildings.

Mayor Mitch LaKind announced he would be forming a coalition of mayors in El Paso County to protest the bill. He stated, however, that “the Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce is in favor of it, which I find strange.” LaKind warned that he would not comply if the bill passes and that it will be difficult to get anything built for the state if the Pikes Peak Regional Building Department (PPRBD) also refuses to comply.

During public comment, residents expressed their opposition to the bill, and council members mentioned that Rep. Don Wilson and Rep. Paul Lundeen were also against it. President and CEO of the Tri-Lakes Chamber of Commerce Terri Hayes expressed opposition to the bill but explained that the Colorado Springs Chamber sees it as a way to bring more people to town. “They see it as a way to solve their labor shortages,” she said.

King read a letter written collectively by the Town Council to oppose Senate Bill 23-213. They argued that the bill would eliminate their ability to zone multi-family housing to locations where the infrastructure is in place, remove their discretion to place certain criteria on multi-family housing, allow the character of neighborhoods to be destroyed by forcing incompatible land uses directly adjacent to single-family homes, mandate expensive studies relative to housing and water resources, and shift the burden and responsibility of what have traditionally been local decisions up to “a state agency.” The letter claimed the bill reflects the state’s belief that “it knows far more about what’s best for the quality of life in their communities than their own citizens do,” and they urged legislators to reject the bill.

The Town Council is also working on a plan to mitigate the impact of the bill if it is passed. After LaKind pledged to not comply, King added, “We will do everything we can to make sure that this bill does not have a negative impact on Monument.”

See letter “Monument Town Council opposes bill” in Letters to the Editor on page < 24 >.

Investigation declared over, CORA request suggests otherwise

Two executive sessions and two special meetings were called to address the investigation report of Dec. 28, 2022. See January’s OCN article for complete reporting of the December special meetings leading up to the investigation findings and recommendations to the Town Council.

Background: The previous Board of Trustees launched the investigation late in the 2022 election cycle that accused the Home Rule Charter Commission of electioneering and fraud. The investigation called for publicly censuring much of the newly elected Council (King, Abbott, Kronick, LaKind), the termination of the town manager and other employees, and filing ethics complaints against the previous town attorney. None of the recommendations has been adopted by the new Council.

April 3: Monument pays for LaKind’s personal attorney: The Town Council broke to executive session to seek guidance from Town Attorney Bob Cole on specific legal questions relating to the report of the investigation findings. Following the session, most members of the public left and three people remained online. An action item was taken to instruct the town manager to pay Mayor LaKind’s personal attorney fees that incurred during December’s investigation. The action item read: “Sherman & Howard Invoice No. 862015 to Mitchell LaKind for Professional Services, 12/22/22 through 1/31/23.” The item passed 6-0 with LaKind—since it benefited him financially—recusing himself from the vote. The council did not disclose the amount of the fees.

Council Member Laura Kronick noted that everyone had to sit through what she called “a debacle” at the end of last year. Kronick referenced “one person” [LaKind] who “stood up and did the right thing.” King added that the town was left without an attorney at the time, and LaKind had taken it upon himself to “handle the situation.” Council Member Jim Romanello put forth the motion. The meeting adjourned without public comment.

April 11: Investigation disavowed and declared over: The first of two special meetings was called on April 11 to bring the investigation findings to a close with proposed resolutions 26, 27, and 28. The investigation itself was not discussed outside of executive session, but the resolutions all passed unanimously. Kronick, LaKind, and Council Member Abbott recused themselves for some of the votes. The resolutions disavowed the investigation, authorized “actions” toward the appointed independent investigator Grant Van Der Jagt, and authorized payment to another law firm, Sherman & Howard. Public comment came from two members of the public who expressed support for the Council’s decisions, and one asking for information on the reports.

Though the Council disavowed the investigation, LaKind expressed how he, as a mayoral candidate at the time, promised to continue the investigation “wherever it led.” LaKind admitted the investigation “took longer than expected and cost taxpayers a lot of money,” but insisted it was done thoroughly. He then said he hopes “the town can heal and move forward” now that the investigation is over. He also mentioned that mistakes were made, but they were not intentional, and a process is now in place to remedy them.

April 17: Former Mayor Pro Tem Elliott questions town endorsements: Former Mayor Pro Tem Kelly Elliott raised concerns during public comment. She brought up a mailer from the Tri-Lakes Chamber of Commerce, which included a letter from Mayor LaKind welcoming new residents to the area that she claimed promoted businesses in Denver and Colorado Springs, not Monument. LaKind responded by stating that he did not know his name was going out beyond the scope of Monument. Elliott then brought up a $1,500 purchase by LaKind at the Tri-Lakes Chamber Annual Dinner for a suite at a Sky Sox game, and asked whether it was a town budgeted item or a personal item. LaKind refused to answer, saying that he would not respond to questions about his personal finances.

Hayes added to the public comment by clarifying that the mailer was sent out by a privately owned welcome wagon company and had nothing to do with the Town of Monument. LaKind requested that his name not be sent out in any future mailers promoting businesses outside of Monument and stated that he would not have added his name to the mailer if he had known it was being used to promote businesses in Denver and Colorado Springs.

April 26: Invoice of legal fees delivered to former mayor pro tem: A special town meeting was held April 26 to discuss a CORA request (a formal request to public records under the Colorado Open Records Act) asking for the receipt for the attorney fees paid to LaKind’s personal attorney. Town lawyer Bob Cole disclosed a conflict of interest by LaKind for two agenda items that dealt with the request. The Council voted 5-0 to accept the disclosure and exempt LaKind from the meeting. The Council also voted to rescind attorney client privilege and avoid an executive session “to allow complete transparency,” as stated by King.

Kronick read a statement expressing that the Council should vote to give Kelly Elliott, the former mayor pro tem who made the request, the invoice she requested. Kronick claimed the invoice “proves no taxpayers’ dollars were spent to personally aid Mayor LaKind” and that she “hope[s] that Kelly Elliott ceases her attacks on the Town and the associated tens of thousands of taxpayers’ dollars spent each time another failed attempt is made to justify the pursuit of a $2,500 honest mistake that was legally cured prior to her initial call for an investigation that began last year.” She ended her statement with the hope that this will “end this chapter in Monument’s history.”

The Council voted unanimously to grant the request (Council Member Marco Fiorito was absent) before the meeting adjourned. Foreman published a press release which claimed to justify the invoice of April 3. “The Town Council considered the Interim Town Attorney’s opinion that legal services described in the invoice related to providing for the interests of the Town of Monument and therefore it is both legal and appropriate for the Town to pay the invoice.”

**********

The Monument Council usually meets at 6:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of each month at Monument Town Hall, 645 Beacon Lite Road. The next two regular meetings are scheduled for Monday, May 1 and Monday, May 15. Call 719-884-8014 or see www.townofmonument.org for information. To see upcoming agendas and complete board packets or to download audio recordings of past meetings, see http://monumenttownco.minutesondemand.com and click on Town Council.

Chris Jeub can be reached at chrisjeub@ocn.me.

Other Monument Town Council, April articles